IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02147806.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A New Approach to Analysing and Visualizing the Management of Corporate Innovation Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Karolin Gebhardt

    (G-SCOP_CPP - Conception Produit Process - G-SCOP - Laboratoire des sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019])

  • Andreas Riel

    (G-SCOP_CPP - Conception Produit Process - G-SCOP - Laboratoire des sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019])

  • Tom Maes

Abstract

Innovating in a complex corporate context requires managing novelty, risk and uncertainty within an environment that strives for stability, efficiency and profitability on a daily basis. Resolving this conflict confront innovation project (IP) managers with extraordinary difficulties, which are normally addressed using classical project management methods and tools. This paper proposes an approach to analyze and capitalize the power of different project management methods within one IP in order to increase both the probability of success and speed to success. This is achieved based on the classification of project tasks and subtasks according to their uncertainty levels with respect to the design problem and the solution. The success of work packages is assessed against pre-defined output criteria. This methodological approach is complemented by the stakeholder dimension, which takes into consideration the involved stakeholders as well as their relationships and influences in the project. The analysis of an ongoing IP at a leading global industrial player in the life science industry serves as validation platform for the presented tool set.

Suggested Citation

  • Karolin Gebhardt & Andreas Riel & Tom Maes, 2019. "A New Approach to Analysing and Visualizing the Management of Corporate Innovation Projects," Post-Print hal-02147806, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02147806
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-28005-5_59
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02147806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02147806/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/978-3-030-28005-5_59?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arent Greve & Janet W. Salaff, 2003. "Social Networks and Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 28(1), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Hoang, Ha & Yi, An, 2015. "Network-based Research in Entrepreneurship: A Decade in Review," Foundations and Trends(R) in Entrepreneurship, now publishers, vol. 11(1), pages 1-54, June.
    3. Aaron J. Shenhar, 2001. "One Size Does Not Fit All Projects: Exploring Classical Contingency Domains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 394-414, March.
    4. Karolin Gebhardt & Andreas Riel & Tom Maes, 2019. "Corporate Entrepreneurship in Complex Organisations: Towards a Holistic Decision Aid Tool Set to Analyse and Plan Innovative Design Projects," Post-Print hal-02147775, HAL.
    5. R. Duane Ireland & Jeffrey G. Covin & Donald F. Kuratko, 2009. "Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(1), pages 19-46, January.
    6. Dedehayir, Ozgur & Mäkinen, Saku J. & Roland Ortt, J., 2018. "Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 18-29.
    7. Karolin Gebhardt & Tom Maes & Andreas Riel, 2018. "A Project Management Decision Support Tool for Keeping Pace with the Dynamics of Corporate Innovation Projects," Post-Print hal-01964592, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Debao Dai & Shihao Wang & Yinxia Ma, 2021. "Performance evaluation of automotive product development team members based on a PLM system: A case study of M Automotive Products Company," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karolin Gebhardt & Andreas Riel & Tom Maes, 2019. "Corporate Entrepreneurship in Complex Organisations: Towards a Holistic Decision Aid Tool Set to Analyse and Plan Innovative Design Projects," Post-Print hal-02147775, HAL.
    2. Getahun Fenta Kebede, 2018. "Social Capital and Entrepreneurial Outcomes: Evidence from Informal Sector Entrepreneurs in Ethiopia," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 27(2), pages 209-242, September.
    3. Lavlu Mozumdar & Geoffrey Hagelaar & Valentina C. Materia & S. W. F. Omta & Mohammad Amirul Islam & Gerben Velde, 2019. "Embeddedness or Over-Embeddedness? Women Entrepreneurs’ Networks and Their Influence on Business Performance," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(5), pages 1449-1469, December.
    4. Erik Lundmark & Anna Krzeminska & Dean A. Shepherd, 2019. "Images of Entrepreneurship: Exploring Root Metaphors and Expanding Upon Them," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(1), pages 138-170, January.
    5. Smith, Claudia G. & Smith, J. Brock, 2021. "Founders' uses of digital networks for resource acquisition: Extending network theory online," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 466-482.
    6. Sullivan, Diane M. & Marvel, Matthew R. & Wolfe, Marcus T., 2021. "With a little help from my friends? How learning activities and network ties impact performance for high tech startups in incubators," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    7. Lavlu Mozumdar & Geoffrey Hagelaar & Valentina C. Materia & S. W. F. Omta & Gerben Velde & Mohammad Amirul Islam, 2023. "Fuelling Entrepreneurial Orientation in Enhancing Business Performance: Women Entrepreneurs’ Contribution to Family Livelihood in a Constrained Context, Bangladesh," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(3), pages 623-655, June.
    8. Dimitris Christopoulos & Stefan Koeppl & Monika Köppl-Turyna, 2022. "Syndication networks and company survival: evidence from European venture capital deals," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 105-135, April.
    9. Yang Song & Leo Paul Dana & Ron Berger, 2021. "The entrepreneurial process and online social networks: forecasting survival rate," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1171-1190, February.
    10. Khurana, Indu & Dutta, Dev K, 2021. "From latent to emergent entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: The role of entrepreneurial learning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    11. Congcong Zheng & Mujtaba Ahsan & Alex F. DeNoble, 2020. "Entrepreneurial Networking During Early Stages of Opportunity Exploitation: Agency of Novice and Experienced New Venture Leaders," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(4), pages 671-699, July.
    12. Butticè, Vincenzo & Croce, Annalisa & Ughetto, Elisa, 2021. "Network dynamics in business angel group investment decisions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    13. Kerr, Jon & Coviello, Nicole, 2020. "Weaving network theory into effectuation: A multi-level reconceptualization of effectual dynamics," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(2).
    14. Sérgio Nunes, 2012. "Information Security Value In E-Entrepreneurship," Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa, vol. 0(2), pages 107-131.
    15. Hor, Shoon Chan (Timothy) & Chang, Artemis & Torres de Oliveira, Rui & Davidsson, Per, 2021. "From the theories of financial resource acquisition to a theory for acquiring financial resources - how should digital ventures raise equity capital beyond seed funding," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    16. Sharon Doreen Mayer & Aki Harima & Jörg Freiling, 2015. "The Adaptation of Intentional Immigrant Entrepreneurs: A Case Study," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 3(3), pages 95-122.
    17. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    18. Lepore, Dominique & Frontoni, Emanuele & Micozzi, Alessandra & Moccia, Sara & Romeo, Luca & Spigarelli, Francesca, 2023. "Uncovering the potential of innovation ecosystems in the healthcare sector after the COVID-19 crisis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 80-86.
    19. Jean–Luc Arregle & Bat Batjargal & Michael A. Hitt & Justin W. Webb & Toyah Miller & Anne S. Tsui, 2015. "Family Ties in Entrepreneurs’ Social Networks and New Venture Growth," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(2), pages 313-344, March.
    20. Michael Stuetzer & David B. Audretsch & Martin Obschonka & Samuel D. Gosling & Peter J. Rentfrow & Jeff Potter, 2018. "Entrepreneurship culture, knowledge spillovers and the growth of regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(5), pages 608-618, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02147806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.