IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02016321.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le jugement de typicalité dans l'évaluation de l'extension de marque

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Ladwein

    (IAE Lille - IAE Lille University School of Management - Lille - Université de Lille)

Abstract

Cet article a pour objectif d'approfondir la question de l'évaluation de l'extension de marque à partir de la notion de typicalité L'étude empirique permet de vérifier que la typicalité de l'extension dans la marque n'est pas équivalente à la typicalité de la marque dans la catégorie de produits envisagée en extension, et que la différence varie selon la structure des catégories de référence.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Ladwein, 1994. "Le jugement de typicalité dans l'évaluation de l'extension de marque," Post-Print hal-02016321, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02016321
    DOI: 10.1177/076737019400900201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. André Le Roux & Marinette Thébault & François Bobrie, 2015. "Typicality impact on brand imitations evaluation and categorization," Post-Print halshs-02530211, HAL.
    2. Nathalie Fleck-Dousteyssier & Elyette Roux & Denis Darpy, 2006. "La congruence dans le parrainage : définition, rôle et mesure," Post-Print hal-01518919, HAL.
    3. Géraldine Michel & Billy Salha, 2005. "L'extension de gamme verticale : Clarification du concept," Post-Print hal-02051192, HAL.
    4. Christophe Bezes, 2010. "Mais de quelle similarité parle-t-on dans les extensions de marque?," Post-Print hal-00573442, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02016321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.