IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01881876.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Évaluation démocratique et performance des politiques publiques territoriales : les enseignements d’une analyse comparative à l’échelle internationale

Author

Listed:
  • Arnaud Bilek

    (LAEP - LAboratoire d'Economie Publique - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, CATT - Centre d'Analyse Théorique et de Traitement des données économiques - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour)

  • David Carassus

    (CREG - Centre de recherche et d'études en gestion - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour)

  • Damien Gardey

Abstract

Cet article propose de mettre en relation une analyse comparative des réalisations menées dans le domaine de la gestion des déchets dans un grands nombre de pays avec un cadre conceptuel en sciences de gestion qui soutient qu'une implication large des différentes parties prenantes à la gestion des politiques publiques peut être un levier d'apprentissages organisationnels. Cette contribution participe à enrichir les fondements théoriques et empiriques de la thèse proposée par Argyris et Schon (1978) et Gareau (2008) selon laquelle la composante démocratique de l'évaluation est un puissant vecteur de performance. Summary This paper shows that the involvement of stakeholders of a public policy may be highly relevant to improve the efficiency of public management. The main mechanism we analyze in this paper is based on the organisational learning theory proposed by Argyris & Schon (1978). The paper focuses on the waste management policy that is one of the main issues of sustainable development. To demonstrate the interest of learning process argument, we propose to analyze some case studies among different countries in the light of the theoretical insights derived from management science literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Arnaud Bilek & David Carassus & Damien Gardey, 2014. "Évaluation démocratique et performance des politiques publiques territoriales : les enseignements d’une analyse comparative à l’échelle internationale," Post-Print hal-01881876, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01881876
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://univ-pau.hal.science/hal-01881876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://univ-pau.hal.science/hal-01881876/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Judith Petts, 2001. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deliberative Processes: Waste Management Case-studies," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 207-226.
    2. Jean-Michel Fourniau, 2001. "Information, access to decision-making and public debate in France: The growing demand for deliberative democracy," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(6), pages 441-451, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arnaud Bilek & David Carassus & Damien Gardey, 2011. "Evaluation démocratique et performance des politiques publiques territoriales : les enseignements d’une analyse comparative à l’échelle internationale," Post-Print hal-01881837, HAL.
    2. Alexander Walter & Roland Scholz, 2007. "Critical success conditions of collaborative methods: a comparative evaluation of transport planning projects," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 195-212, March.
    3. Finardi, Corrado & Pellegrini, Giuseppe & Rowe, Gene, 2012. "Food safety issues: From Enlightened Elitism towards Deliberative Democracy? An overview of EFSA’s “Public Consultation” instrument," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 427-438.
    4. Stephen Jones, 2020. "Waste Management in Australia Is an Environmental Crisis: What Needs to Change so Adaptive Governance Can Help?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Jamie K. Wardman, 2008. "The Constitution of Risk Communication in Advanced Liberal Societies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1619-1637, December.
    6. Arnaud Bilek & David Carassus & Damien Gardey, 2010. "La gestion démocratique des politiques de développement durable : une analyse comparative à l'échelle internationale dans le cas de la gestion des déchets," Post-Print hal-01881843, HAL.
    7. Abelson, Julia & Forest, Pierre-Gerlier & Eyles, John & Casebeer, Ann & Martin, Elisabeth & Mackean, Gail, 2007. "Examining the role of context in the implementation of a deliberative public participation experiment: Results from a Canadian comparative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(10), pages 2115-2128, May.
    8. Sinclair, Philip, 2011. ""Describing the elephant": A framework for supporting sustainable development processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 2990-2998, August.
    9. Karen Bickerstaff & Gordon Walker, 2005. "Shared Visions, Unholy Alliances: Power, Governance and Deliberative Processes in Local Transport Planning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(12), pages 2123-2144, November.
    10. David Carassus & Damien Gardey, 2010. "Enjeux, dispositifs, apprentissages et impacts potentiels de la gestion démocratique des biens collectifs : le cas de la gestion des déchets," Post-Print hal-02431984, HAL.
    11. Lia T. Vasconcelos & Flávia Z. Silva & Filipa G. Ferreira & Graça Martinho & Ana Pires & José Carlos Ferreira, 2022. "Collaborative process design for waste management: co-constructing strategies with stakeholders," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 9243-9259, July.
    12. Baptiste Bedessem & Lucie Morère & Louise Roblin & Anne Dozières & Anne-Caroline Prévot, 2022. "Participatory Biodiversity Governance: A Comparison of Two French Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Jan Bebbington & Judy Brown & Bob Frame & Ian Thomson, 2007. "Theorizing engagement: the potential of a critical dialogic approach," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(3), pages 356-381, June.
    14. Tina Katika & Ioannis Karaseitanidis & Dimitra Tsiakou & Christos Makropoulos & Angelos Amditis, 2022. "Augmented Reality (AR) Supporting Citizen Engagement in Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 1077-1104, September.
    15. Fahy, Frances & Davies, Anna, 2007. "Home improvements: Household waste minimisation and action research," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 13-27.
    16. Abelson, Julia & Eyles, John & McLeod, Christopher B. & Collins, Patricia & McMullan, Colin & Forest, Pierre-Gerlier, 2003. "Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 95-106, October.
    17. Takeuchi Ayano, 2021. "A survey of methods for evaluating mini-publics," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Santos, Rui & Antunes, Paula & Baptista, Gualter & Mateus, Pedro & Madruga, Luisa, 2006. "Stakeholder participation in the design of environmental policy mixes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 100-110, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01881876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.