IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01881857.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does Africa Trade Less than it Should and Why?

Author

Listed:
  • Antoine Bouët

    (IFPRI - International Food Policy Research Institute [Washington] - CGIAR - Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR], CATT - Centre d'Analyse Théorique et de Traitement des données économiques - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour)

Abstract

Africa’s share in world exports has declined sharply over time. This raises the question whether the observed pattern of exports from Africa is consistent with the predicted or expected level of trade. This paper addresses the question whether or not Africa is an under-trading continent. We answer this question using a much improved dataset for obtaining predicted trade and by employing methods that correct for bias in estimates of under-trading. Our results indicate that globally Africa is an under-exporter in our preferred Heckman specification. This result is robust to addition of different controls and application of different variants of the gravity model of trade. We further ask the question what could explain Africa’s under-trading. We find that accounting for transport and communication infrastructure reduces the under-trading effect for Africa and in some specifications of the gravity model, the under-trading effect vanishes altogether. In order to assess the impact of infrastructure on trade, we employ a semi parametric variant of the gravity model. This model allows for unknown nonlinear impact of infrastructure on trade and also complementarity among several infrastructure variables. Results from the semi-parametric model provide evidence for significant non-linear impacts of infrastructure where the effects for a large number of African countries are significant and compare favorably with marginal effects of infrastructure in countries in other continents being in comparable income brackets. This model also finds evidence for complementarity across transport and communication infrastructure implying that much greater impacts will be likely if the infrastructure are developed jointly rather than in isolation.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Antoine Bouët, 2008. "Does Africa Trade Less than it Should and Why?," Post-Print hal-01881857, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01881857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Craig Macphee & Peter Cook & Wanasin Sattayanuwat, 2013. "Transportation and The International Trade of Eastern and Southern Africa," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 81(2), pages 225-239, June.
    2. Bouet, Antoine & Laborde, David, 2010. "Eight Years of Doha Trade Talks: Where Do We Stand?," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Bo Xiong & John Beghin, 2017. "Does European aflatoxin regulation hurt groundnut exporters from Africa?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: John Christopher Beghin (ed.), Nontariff Measures and International Trade, chapter 16, pages 287-307, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Roberto Urrunaga & Sara Wong, 2015. "When the total is more than the sum of parts : infrastructure complementarities," Working Papers 15-09, Centro de Investigación, Universidad del Pacífico.
    5. Imran Ur Rahman & Mohsin Shafi & Liu Junrong & Enitilina Tatiani M.K. Fetuu & Shah Fahad & Buddhi Prasad Sharma, 2021. "Infrastructure and Trade: An Empirical Study Based on China and Selected Asian Economies," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    6. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Emilia Lamonaca, 2019. "On the impact of non-tariff measures on trade performances of the African agri-food sector," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 389-406, October.
    7. Estrella Gómez-Herrera, 2013. "Comparing alternative methods to estimate gravity models of bilateral trade," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 1087-1111, June.
    8. Zahid Hussain & Nadia Hanif & Wasim Abbas Shaheen & Muhammad Nadeem, 2019. "Empirical Analysis of Multiple Infrastructural Covariates: An Application of Gravity Model on Asian Economies," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(3), pages 299-317, March.
    9. Antoine Bouet & David Laborde, 2010. "Eight Years of Doha Trade Talks: Where Do We Stand?," Larefi Working Papers 201003, Larefi, Université Bordeaux 4.
    10. Gerda Dewit & Dermot Leahy, 2018. "Attracting Foreign Direct Investment in Infrastructure," Economics Department Working Paper Series n290-18.pdf, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland - Maynooth.
    11. Bouet, Antoine & Laborde Debucquet, David, 2010. "Eight years of Doha trade talks," IFPRI discussion papers 997, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    12. Calì, Massimiliano & te Velde, Dirk Willem, 2011. "Does Aid for Trade Really Improve Trade Performance?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 725-740, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01881857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.