IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01615081.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An unpublished letter of David Ricardo on the double standard of money

Author

Listed:
  • Ghislain Deleplace

    (LED - Laboratoire d'Economie Dionysien - UP8 - Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis)

  • Christophe Depoortère

    (LED - Laboratoire d'Economie Dionysien - UP8 - Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis)

  • Nicolas Rieucau

    (LED - Laboratoire d'Economie Dionysien - UP8 - Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis)

Abstract

This article transcripts and comments a hitherto unpublished letter by David Ricardo, dated 19 January 1823 and addressed to Grenfell. In this letter Ricardo opposes the adoption of a double standard of money, two years after the return to convertibility of banknotes and in the midst of an economic recession that pressed for drastic monetary changes. It contains an argument -- linking the double standard of money, the seignorage on the silver coin, the behaviour of the Bank of England, and the fall in the value of the pound -- which is to be found nowhere else in Ricardo's works.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Ghislain Deleplace & Christophe Depoortère & Nicolas Rieucau, 2013. "An unpublished letter of David Ricardo on the double standard of money," Post-Print hal-01615081, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01615081
    DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2011.565359
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01615081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01615081/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09672567.2011.565359?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnold Heertje, 2007. "An Unpublished Letter by David Ricardo," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 39(3), pages 545-550, Fall.
    2. Heertje, Arnold & Weatherall, David, 1978. "An Unpublished Letter of David Ricardo: To Thomas Smith of Easton Grey, 27 April 1819," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 88(351), pages 569-571, September.
    3. Heertje, A & Weatherall, D & Polak, R W, 1985. "An Unpublished Letter of David Ricardo to Francis Finch, 24 February 1823," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 95(380), pages 1091-1092, December.
    4. Arnold Heertje, 1991. "Three Unpublished Letters by David Ricardo," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 519-526, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghislain Deleplace, 2020. "Orthodox versus Unorthodox Views on Ricardo’s Theory of Money," Post-Print hal-04253395, HAL.
    2. Ghislain Deleplace, 2019. "“Orthodox versus Unorthodox Views on Ricardo’s Theory of Money”," Post-Print hal-04429116, HAL.
    3. Ghislain Deleplace, 2019. "“Orthodox versus Unorthodox Views on Ricardo’s Theory of Money”," Post-Print hal-04429068, HAL.
    4. Ghislain Deleplace, 2023. "GRENVILLE'S WAR AND POST-WAR VIEWS ON MONEY IN EARLY 19 th -CENTURY BRITAIN," Post-Print hal-04429551, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timothy Davis, 2002. "David Ricardo, financier and empirical economist," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16.
    2. Madarász, Aladár, 2018. "A "túl elméleti" tőzsdeügynök: David Ricardo és az Alapelvek kétszáz éve ["Too theoretical" a stockjobber: 200 years of David Ricardo and his principles]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 449-483.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01615081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.