IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01396212.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Beyond analogy: A model of bioinspiration for creative design

Author

Listed:
  • Armand Hatchuel

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Camila Freitas Salgueiredo

    (Technocentre Renault [Guyancourt] - RENAULT)

Abstract

Is biologically inspired design only an analogical transfer from biology to engineering? Actually, nature does not always bring "hands-on" solutions that can be analogically applied in classic engineering. Then, what are the different operations that are involved in the bioinspiration process and what are the conditions allowing this process to produce a bioinspired design? In this paper, we model the whole design process in which bioinspiration is only one element. To build this model, we use a general design theory, concept–knowledge theory, because it allows one to capture analogy as well as all other knowledge changes that lead to the design of a bioinspired solution.We ground this model on well-described examples of biologically inspired designs available in the scientific literature. These examples include Flectofinw, a hingeless flapping mechanism conceived for fac¸ade shading, and WhalePower technology, the introduction of bumps on the leading edge of airfoils to improve aerodynamic properties. Our modeling disentangles the analogical aspects of the biologically inspired design process, and highlights the expansions occurring in both knowledge bases, scientific (nonbiological) and biological, as well as the impact of these expansions in the generation of new concepts (concept partitioning). This model also shows that bioinspired design requires a special form of collaboration between engineers and biologists. Contrasting with the classic oneway transfer between biology and engineering that is assumed in the literature, the concept–knowledge framework shows that these collaborations must be "mutually inspirational" because both biological and engineering knowledge expansions are needed to reach a novel solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Armand Hatchuel & Camila Freitas Salgueiredo, 2016. "Beyond analogy: A model of bioinspiration for creative design," Post-Print hal-01396212, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01396212
    DOI: 10.1017/S0890060416000044
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-01396212v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-01396212v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1017/S0890060416000044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colin Dawson & Julian F. V. Vincent & Anne-Marie Rocca, 1997. "How pine cones open," Nature, Nature, vol. 390(6661), pages 668-668, December.
    2. Ehud Kroll & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2014. "Steepest-first exploration with learning-based path evaluation: uncovering the design strategy of parameter analysis with C-K theory," Post-Print hal-01070428, HAL.
    3. Reich Yoram & Armand Hatchuel & Shai Offer & Eswaran Subrahamanian, 2012. "A theoretical analysis of creativity methods in engineering design: casting and improving ASIT within C-K theory," Post-Print hal-00822914, HAL.
    4. Kellar Autumn & Yiching A. Liang & S. Tonia Hsieh & Wolfgang Zesch & Wai Pang Chan & Thomas W. Kenny & Ronald Fearing & Robert J. Full, 2000. "Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6787), pages 681-685, June.
    5. Marine Agogué & Akin Osman Kazakçi & Armand Hatchuel & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil & Nicolas Poirel & Mathieu Cassotti, 2014. "The impacts of examples on creative design : explaining fixation and stimulation effects," Post-Print hal-00707354, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Salembier, Chloé & Segrestin, Blanche & Berthet, Elsa & Weil, Benoît & Meynard, Jean-Marc, 2018. "Genealogy of design reasoning in agronomy: Lessons for supporting the design of agricultural systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 277-290.
    2. John P. Ulhøi, 2021. "From innovation-as-usual towards unusual innovation: using nature as an inspiration," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.
    3. V. U. Vinitha & Deepak S. Kumar & Keyoor Purani, 2021. "Biomorphic visual identity of a brand and its effects: a holistic perspective," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 272-290, May.
    4. Frank Stadler & Luke Houghton, 2020. "Breathing life into climate change adaptation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(2), pages 400-409, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marine Agogué & Armand Hatchuel, 2015. "Reinventing classics: the hidden design strategies of renowned chefs," Post-Print hal-01252978, HAL.
    2. Pascal Le Masson & Armand Hatchuel & Benoit Weil, 2016. "Innovation theory and the logic of generativity: from optimization to design, a new post-decisional paradigm in management science," Post-Print hal-01481881, HAL.
    3. Ehud Kroll & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2022. "Abduction And Design Theory: Disentangling The Two Notions To Unbound Generativity In Science," Post-Print hal-03609911, HAL.
    4. Shu Imaizumi & Ubuka Tagami & Yi Yang, 2020. "Fluid movements enhance creative fluency: A replication of Slepian and Ambady (2012)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-10, July.
    5. Maxime Thomas & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2017. "Why is Business Model Innovation so poorly innovative ? Uncovering the critical role of collaborative design in Business Model Innovation," Post-Print hal-01499143, HAL.
    6. Hongmiao Tian & Duorui Wang & Yahui Zhang & Yuanze Jiang & Tianci Liu & Xiangming Li & Chunhui Wang & Xiaoliang Chen & Jinyou Shao, 2022. "Core–shell dry adhesives for rough surfaces via electrically responsive self-growing strategy," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Roger A. Sauer, 2009. "Multiscale modelling and simulation of the deformation and adhesion of a single gecko seta," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(6), pages 627-640.
    8. Artem Holstov & Graham Farmer & Ben Bridgens, 2017. "Sustainable Materialisation of Responsive Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Manso, Rubén & Pardos, Marta & Keyes, Christopher R. & Calama, Rafael, 2012. "Modelling the spatio-temporal pattern of primary dispersal in stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) stands in the Northern Plateau (Spain)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 11-21.
    10. Pascal Le Masson, 2017. "Why new approaches are needed for innovation - and brainstomring won't help!," Post-Print hal-01619987, HAL.
    11. Quentin Plantec & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2020. "Impact of knowledge search practices on the originality of inventions: a study in the oil & gas industry," Post-Print hal-02613665, HAL.
    12. John P. Ulhøi, 2021. "From innovation-as-usual towards unusual innovation: using nature as an inspiration," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Pascal Le Masson & Armand Hatchuel & Mario Le Glatin & Benoit Weil, 2018. "Designing Decisions In The Unknown: Towards A Generative Decision Model For Management Science," Post-Print hal-01937103, HAL.
    14. Armand Hatchuel & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2017. "C-K theory: modelling creative thinking and its impact on research," Post-Print hal-01701853, HAL.
    15. Giuseppe Attanasi & Michela Chessa & Carlo Ciucani & Sara Gil Gallen, 2020. "Children's GrI-Creativity: Effects of Limited Resources in Creative Drawing," GREDEG Working Papers 2020-34, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    16. Armand Hatchuel & Pascal Le Masson & Yoram Reich & Eswaran Subrahmanian, 2018. "Design theory: a foundation of a new paradigm for design science and engineering," Post-Print hal-01633021, HAL.
    17. Ehud Kroll & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2013. "Modeling Parameter Analysis Design Moves With C-K Theory," Post-Print hal-01485086, HAL.
    18. Raphaëlle Barbier & Maxime Thomas & Benoit Weil & Pascal Le Masson, 2019. "Revisiting The Management Of Technology-Push Situations By Maximizing Discovery And Inhibiting Screening," Post-Print hal-02168040, HAL.
    19. Roger A. Sauer & Matthias Holl, 2013. "A detailed 3D finite element analysis of the peeling behaviour of a gecko spatula," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(6), pages 577-591, June.
    20. Pascal Le Masson & Armand Hatchuel & Benoit Weil, 2015. "Design theory at Bauhaus: teaching “splitting” knowledge," Post-Print hal-01243332, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01396212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.