IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01370707.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Organisation professionnelle : la gestion des compétences clés dans les Grands Restaurants

Author

Listed:
  • Carole Drucker-Godard

    (DMSP - Dauphine marketing, stratégie, prospective - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, IDEFS - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres)

  • Isabelle Bouty

    (CEROS - Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches sur les Organisations et la Stratégie - UPN - Université Paris Nanterre)

  • Marie-Léandre Gomez

    (ESSEC Business School)

Abstract

Pourquoi le meilleur des apprentis ne parviendra-t-il jamais exactement au même niveau de maîtrise que son maître ? La question de l'application et du transfert des compétences est essentielle pour beaucoup d'organisations. Dans les organisations qualifiées de « professionnelles », cette question est véritablement fondamentale, d'autant plus que les compétences clés sont entre les mains d'un nombre restreint d'acteurs, parfois même d'un ou deux individus seulement. C'est le cas dans les grands restaurants, où le problème de la nature des compétences du chef, de son second et du reste de son équipe, est central. Dans ces restaurants, dirigés par des chefs au talent internationalement réputé, les caractéristiques des organisations professionnelles sont exacerbées. Ainsi, il existe un très petit nombre de ces restaurants. La qualité exceptionnelle de leur cuisine est un indicateur de la rareté des compétences au sein du secteur. Ces restaurants présentent des niveaux d'excellence comparables mais leur cuisine sera toujours différente : deux chefs, deux cuisines. Enfin, Ces différences reposent sur les compétences distinctives d'un homme, le chef. Cette communication présente les premiers résultats d'un projet de recherche plus large autour des compétences dans les grands restaurants français (soit la vingtaine d'établissements ayant trois étoiles au guide Michelin). Dans un premier temps, nous présentons notre projet de recherche global (centré autour de l'identification des compétences, leur dynamique et la création collective de valeur autour de compétences personnelles) et notre méthodologie qui s'appuie essentiellement sur des entretiens directs, des observations en cuisine et des données secondaires. Puis, nous identifions les compétences au travers de l'analyse d'un cas, en différenciant les compétences du chef, de son second, et des autres cuisiniers. Nous caractérisons les compétences spécifiques du chef et analysons leur coordination avec les compétences des autres cuisiniers ainsi que leur intégration dans l'activité collective.

Suggested Citation

  • Carole Drucker-Godard & Isabelle Bouty & Marie-Léandre Gomez, 2001. "Organisation professionnelle : la gestion des compétences clés dans les Grands Restaurants," Post-Print hal-01370707, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01370707
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01370707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01370707/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    2. George P. Huber, 1991. "Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 88-115, February.
    3. John Seely Brown & Paul Duguid, 1991. "Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 40-57, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nooteboom, Bart, 1996. "Towards a cognitive theory of the firm : issues and a logic of change," Research Report 97B05, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    2. Agulles, Remei & Prats, Mª Julia, 2011. "Learning in practice: What organizational and management literature can contribute to professional and occupational development," IESE Research Papers D/938, IESE Business School.
    3. James B. Thomas & Stephanie Watts Sussman & John C. Henderson, 2001. "Understanding “Strategic Learning”: Linking Organizational Learning, Knowledge Management, and Sensemaking," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 331-345, June.
    4. Stoian, Maria-Cristina & Tardios, Janja Annabel & Samdanis, Marios, 2024. "The knowledge-based view in international business: A systematic review of the literature and future research directions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2).
    5. Katsuhiko Shimizu, 2008. "New Strategy Implementation and Learning: Importance of Consensus," Working Papers 0034, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    6. Jeffrey Cummings, 2003. "Knowledge Sharing : A Review of the Literature," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 19060.
    7. Elkjær, Bente, 2000. "Knowledge Work and Organisational Learning," Working Papers 2000-1, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Informatics.
    8. Linda Argote & Ella Miron-Spektor, 2011. "Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1123-1137, October.
    9. Berthoin Antal, Ariane & Krebsbach-Gnath, Camilla, 1998. "Consultants as agents of organizational learning: the importance of marginality," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organisation and Technology FS II 98-109, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    10. Bernardo Batiz-Lazo & Jorge Gomes & Maria Mendes, 2002. "New Product Development & Management Of Knowledge In Portuguese Higher Education," Industrial Organization 0211019, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. J S Edwards & B Ababneh & M Hall & D Shaw, 2009. "Knowledge management: a review of the field and of OR's contribution," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 114-125, May.
    12. Papadopoulos, Thanos & Stamati, Teta & Nopparuch, Pawit, 2013. "Exploring the determinants of knowledge sharing via employee weblogs," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 133-146.
    13. Eden Yin & Yongjian Bao, 2006. "The acquisition of tacit knowledge in China: An empirical analysis of the ‘supplier-side individual level’ and ‘recipient-side’ factors," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 327-348, June.
    14. Karlheinz Krautz & Morten Thanning Vendelø, 2001. "Knowledge Sharing as Spontaneous Order: On the Emergence of Strong and Weak Ties," ROCK Working Papers 016, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised 12 Jun 2008.
    15. Daniel Z. Levin & Rob Cross, 2004. "The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1477-1490, November.
    16. G.T. Lumpkin & Benyamin Bergmann Lichtenstein, 2005. "The Role of Organizational Learning in the Opportunity–Recognition Process," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(4), pages 451-472, July.
    17. Jerez-Gomez, Pilar & Cespedes-Lorente, Jose & Valle-Cabrera, Ramon, 2005. "Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(6), pages 715-725, June.
    18. Arvind Malhotra & Sanjay Gosain & Omar A. El Sawy, 2007. "Leveraging Standard Electronic Business Interfaces to Enable Adaptive Supply Chain Partnerships," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 260-279, September.
    19. Nitin Simha Vihari & M. K. Rao & Prince Doliya, 2019. "Organisational Learning As An Innovative Determinant Of Organisational Sustainability: An Evidence Based Approach," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(03), pages 1-24, April.
    20. Duniesky Feitó Madrigal & Alejandro Mungaray Lagarda & Michelle Texis Flores, 2016. "Factors associated with learning management in Mexican micro-entrepreneurs," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 32(141), pages 381-386, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01370707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.