IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01361219.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Shareholder Model of the Corporation, Between Mythology and Reality

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Weinstein

    (CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - USPC - Université Sorbonne Paris Cité - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

The corporate governance thought has been dominated since 30 years by the shareholder primacy model. Lynn Stout present us, in his brilliant book, The Shareholder Value Myth, a very clear and conclusive argumentation against this view. In my comments, I consider first some key critics of the shareholder value ideology and its foundations. Next, I address the question of the real nature of shareholders, and shareholders' interests, essential in the argumentation of Lynn Stout, before coming to critical issues concerning directors and managers. That is, first, the normative question of director's duties, and secondly the factual question of the nature of the top management in contemporary capitalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Weinstein, 2013. "The Shareholder Model of the Corporation, Between Mythology and Reality," Post-Print hal-01361219, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01361219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergakis Konstantinos, 2015. "Deconstruction and Reconstruction of the “Comply or Explain” Principle in EU Capital Markets," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 5(3), pages 233-288, November.
    2. Bava Fabrizio & Gromis di Trana Melchiorre, 2016. "Disclosure on Related Party Transactions: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 119-150, July.
    3. Mocsary George A., 2014. "The Embedded Firm: Corporate Governance, Labor, and Finance Capitalism – Commentary," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 4(2), pages 123-136, July.
    4. Weinstein Olivier, 2013. "The Shareholder Model of the Corporation, Between Mythology and Reality," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 43-60, January.
    5. Styhre Alexander, 2018. "The Making of the Shareholder Primacy Governance Model: Price Theory, the Law and Economics School, and Corporate Law Retrenchment Advocacy," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 8(3), pages 1-31, December.
    6. Stout Lynn, 2013. "The Troubling Question of Corporate Purpose," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 61-70, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01361219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.