IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/aelcon/v3y2013i1p61-70n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Troubling Question of Corporate Purpose

Author

Listed:
  • Stout Lynn

    (Distinguished Professor of Corporate and Business Law, Law School, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA)

Abstract

What is the purpose of the corporation? This fundamental question has troubled generations of corporate scholars. It troubles them still, as witness the thoughtful and thought-provoking pieces by Thomas Clarke, Faith Stevelman and Olivier Weinstein gathered together in this issue of the CONVIVIUM. In this brief essay, I do not comment, in any detail, on Clarke’s, Stevelman’s, or Weinstein’s articles. Rather, I seek to defend their work, and my book as well, from the predictable charge that we have not offered a common theory of corporate purpose to “beat” shareholder primacy theory. In doing this, I exercise the lawyer’s prerogative and defend against the “it takes a theory” accusation by arguing in the alternative. First, I argue that sometimes a theory can be so misleading that it should be abandoned, even if no good alternative is available. Second, I argue more tentatively that there may be in fact a superior alternative theory of corporate purpose implicit in the literature critiquing shareholder primacy, including the articles by Clarke, Stevelman, and Weinstein. This theory, which might be dubbed the multifunction theory, recognizes that the corporation is only an organizational form, a means that can be (and is) employed by different individuals to serve different ends. Clark, Stevelman, Weinstein, and I have all at different times adopted slightly different perspectives on what the ends of the corporation ought to be. We may all, from our own perspectives, be correct.

Suggested Citation

  • Stout Lynn, 2013. "The Troubling Question of Corporate Purpose," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 61-70, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:aelcon:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:61-70:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/ael-2013-0042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2013-0042
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ael-2013-0042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Weinstein, 2013. "The Shareholder Model of the Corporation, Between Mythology and Reality," Post-Print hal-01361219, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José Ángel Moreno Izquierdo, 2019. "De la empresa accionarial a la empresa participativa," Revista de Economía Crítica, Asociación de Economía Crítica, vol. 28, pages 55-68.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergakis Konstantinos, 2015. "Deconstruction and Reconstruction of the “Comply or Explain” Principle in EU Capital Markets," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 5(3), pages 233-288, November.
    2. Mocsary George A., 2014. "The Embedded Firm: Corporate Governance, Labor, and Finance Capitalism – Commentary," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 4(2), pages 123-136, July.
    3. Styhre Alexander, 2018. "The Making of the Shareholder Primacy Governance Model: Price Theory, the Law and Economics School, and Corporate Law Retrenchment Advocacy," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 8(3), pages 1-31, December.
    4. Bava Fabrizio & Gromis di Trana Melchiorre, 2016. "Disclosure on Related Party Transactions: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 119-150, July.
    5. Weinstein Olivier, 2013. "The Shareholder Model of the Corporation, Between Mythology and Reality," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 43-60, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:aelcon:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:61-70:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.