IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01320641.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Performance evaluation of interconnected logistics networks confronted to hub disruptions

Author

Listed:
  • Yanyan Yang

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Shenle Pan

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Eric Ballot

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

This paper investigates performance of interconnected logistics networks confronted to disruptions at hub level. With traditional supply chain network design, companies define and optimize their own logistics networks, resulting in current logistics systems being a set of independent heterogeneous logistics networks. The concept of PI aims to integrate independent logistics networks into a global, open, interconnected system. Prior research has shown that the new organization can reduce the actual transportation cost through the optimization of full truckload and integration of different transportation means. Continuing along these lines, this paper examines how the interconnected logistics networks applying PI deal with disruption problems at hubs. To attain this, a multi-agent based simulation model with dynamic transportation protocols is proposed. Random disruptions at hubs are considered. Case studies of FMCG cases in France have been taken out. Results suggest that though exposed with disruption risks the PI is a robust logistic system. This paper indicates a novel approach to build a resilient supply network.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanyan Yang & Shenle Pan & Eric Ballot, 2016. "Performance evaluation of interconnected logistics networks confronted to hub disruptions," Post-Print hal-01320641, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01320641
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01320641v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01320641v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harry Groenevelt & Liliane Pintelon & Abraham Seidmann, 1992. "Production Lot Sizing with Machine Breakdowns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 104-123, January.
    2. Tingting Cui & Yanfeng Ouyang & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2010. "Reliable Facility Location Design Under the Risk of Disruptions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 998-1011, August.
    3. Rochdi Sarraj & Eric Ballot & Shenle Pan & Driss Hakimi & Benoit Montreuil, 2014. "Interconnected logistic networks and protocols: simulation-based efficiency assessment," Post-Print hal-01112138, HAL.
    4. Klibi, Walid & Martel, Alain, 2012. "Scenario-based Supply Chain Network risk modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 644-658.
    5. Schmitt, Amanda J., 2011. "Strategies for customer service level protection under multi-echelon supply chain disruption risk," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1266-1283, September.
    6. Baghalian, Atefeh & Rezapour, Shabnam & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani, 2013. "Robust supply chain network design with service level against disruptions and demand uncertainties: A real-life case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 199-215.
    7. Kamalahmadi, Masoud & Parast, Mahour Mellat, 2016. "A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 116-133.
    8. Eric Ballot & Olivier Gobet & Benoit Montreuil, 2012. "Physical Internet Enabled Open Hub Network Design for Distributed Networked Operations," Post-Print hal-00696956, HAL.
    9. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    10. Cui, Tingting & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max J, 2010. "Reliable Facility Location Design under the Risk of Disruptions," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5sh2c7pw, University of California Transportation Center.
    11. Mehmet Gümüş & Saibal Ray & Haresh Gurnani, 2012. "Supply-Side Story: Risks, Guarantees, Competition, and Information Asymmetry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(9), pages 1694-1714, September.
    12. Yanyan Yang & Shenle Pan & Eric Ballot, 2015. "A model to take advantage of Physical Internet for vendor inventory management [Un modèle de gestion de stock en avantage de l'Internet Physique pour les vendeurs]," Post-Print hal-01128761, HAL.
    13. Yossi Sheffi, 2005. "The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262693496, April.
    14. Lawrence V. Snyder & Mark S. Daskin, 2005. "Reliability Models for Facility Location: The Expected Failure Cost Case," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 400-416, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanyan Yang & Shenle Pan & Eric Ballot, 2017. "Mitigating supply chain disruptions through interconnected logistics services in the Physical Internet," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(14), pages 3970-3983, July.
    2. Fattahi, Mohammad & Govindan, Kannan & Maihami, Reza, 2020. "Stochastic optimization of disruption-driven supply chain network design with a new resilience metric," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    3. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui & Boris Sokolov & Marina Ivanova, 2017. "Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(20), pages 6158-6174, October.
    4. Heckmann, Iris & Comes, Tina & Nickel, Stefan, 2015. "A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 119-132.
    5. Parajuli, Anubhuti & Kuzgunkaya, Onur & Vidyarthi, Navneet, 2017. "Responsive contingency planning of capacitated supply networks under disruption risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 13-37.
    6. Aldrighetti, Riccardo & Battini, Daria & Ivanov, Dmitry & Zennaro, Ilenia, 2021. "Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: A review and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    7. Jiguang Wang & Yucai Wu, 2019. "A Continuous Approximation Approach Based on Regular Hexagon Partition for the Facility Location Problem under Disruptions Risk," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, February.
    8. Michael K. Lim & Achal Bassamboo & Sunil Chopra & Mark S. Daskin, 2013. "Facility Location Decisions with Random Disruptions and Imperfect Estimation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 239-249, May.
    9. Gholami-Zanjani, Seyed Mohammad & Klibi, Walid & Jabalameli, Mohammad Saeed & Pishvaee, Mir Saman, 2021. "The design of resilient food supply chain networks prone to epidemic disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    10. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Seddighi, Amir Hossein, 2013. "A location-routing problem with disruption risk," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 63-82.
    11. Ivanov, Dmitry & Pavlov, Alexander & Dolgui, Alexandre & Pavlov, Dmitry & Sokolov, Boris, 2016. "Disruption-driven supply chain (re)-planning and performance impact assessment with consideration of pro-active and recovery policies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 7-24.
    12. Fahimnia, Behnam & Jabbarzadeh, Armin, 2016. "Marrying supply chain sustainability and resilience: A match made in heaven," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 306-324.
    13. Nader Azad & Elkafi Hassini, 2019. "A Benders Decomposition Method for Designing Reliable Supply Chain Networks Accounting for Multimitigation Strategies and Demand Losses," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 1287-1312, September.
    14. Nader Azad & Georgios Saharidis & Hamid Davoudpour & Hooman Malekly & Seyed Yektamaram, 2013. "Strategies for protecting supply chain networks against facility and transportation disruptions: an improved Benders decomposition approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 125-163, November.
    15. Mohammaddust, Faeghe & Rezapour, Shabnam & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Mofidfar, Mohammad & Hill, Alex, 2017. "Developing lean and responsive supply chains: A robust model for alternative risk mitigation strategies in supply chain designs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 632-653.
    16. Fahimnia, Behnam & Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Sarkis, Joseph, 2018. "Greening versus resilience: A supply chain design perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 129-148.
    17. Asefeh Hasani Goodarzi & Seyed Hessameddin Zegordi & Gülgün Alpan & Isa Nakhai Kamalabadi & Ali Husseinzadeh Kashan, 2021. "Reliable cross-docking location problem under the risk of disruptions," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1569-1612, September.
    18. Kanokporn Kungwalsong & Chen-Yang Cheng & Chumpol Yuangyai & Udom Janjarassuk, 2021. "Two-Stage Stochastic Program for Supply Chain Network Design under Facility Disruptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Parajuli, Anubhuti & Kuzgunkaya, Onur & Vidyarthi, Navneet, 2021. "The impact of congestion on protection decisions in supply networks under disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    20. Azad, Nader & Hassini, Elkafi, 2019. "Recovery strategies from major supply disruptions in single and multiple sourcing networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 481-501.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Disruption; Physical Internet; Simulation; Routing;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01320641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.