IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01300256.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pour une conception piagétienne de la compétence tacite : Étude de la dyade situation -métacognition

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Ali Abdelwahed

    (CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - USPC - Université Sorbonne Paris Cité - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Luc Marco

    (CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - USPC - Université Sorbonne Paris Cité - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Stefka Mihaylova

    (CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - USPC - Université Sorbonne Paris Cité - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Nous nous intéressons dans ce papier aux compétences tacites mobilisées dans la relation de service. Ceci nécessite un compromis entre deux conceptions de la connaissance qui diffèrent assez fondamentalement : les tenants de la cognition située et les tenants des représentations mentales. Ainsi, nous essayerons dans cette recherche de développer une conception piagétienne de la compétence, s'inspirant de la cognition située et de l'ethnométhodologie, mettant la situation vécue et l'action au centre de l'analyse. Notre réflexion sur les compétences tacites s'enracine dans les approches théoriques qui mettent au centre le concept de situation (Jonnaert, 2006 ; Journé et Raulet-Croset, 2008) et de la métacognition (Flavell, 1976 ; Brown, 1987 ; Sperber, 1994). Ces dernières sont tout à fait cohérentes avec les approches contextualisées et situées de la compétence (Dewey, 1993 ; Leplat et Montmollin, 2001), qui arguent du fait que les compétences mobilisées naissent de la confrontation à un contexte, et du sens donné par les acteurs aux situations auxquelles ils sont confrontés. Les tenants de la cognition située cherchent notamment à prendre en compte toute la partie de la cognition qui, échappant au raisonnement, est directement déterminée par la situation que vit l'acteur. Les résultats obtenus à l'issue d'une enquête ethnométhodologique au sein de la SNCF lève le voile sur le rôle primordial que joue la métacompétence in situ dans l'architecture du concept étudié. Mots clés : Compétence tacite – métacompétence – situation – relation de service – SNCF.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Ali Abdelwahed & Luc Marco & Stefka Mihaylova, 2015. "Pour une conception piagétienne de la compétence tacite : Étude de la dyade situation -métacognition," Post-Print hal-01300256, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01300256
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01300256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01300256/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott D. N. Cook & John Seely Brown, 1999. "Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance Between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 381-400, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierre Marie Stassart & Maarten Crivits & Julie Hermesse & Louis Tessier & Julie Van Damme & Joost Dessein, 2018. "The Generative Potential of Tensions within Belgian Agroecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa & Ann Majchrzak, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Vigilant Interaction in Knowledge Collaboration: Challenges of Online User Participation Under Ambivalence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 773-784, December.
    3. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    4. Colvin, John & Blackmore, Chris & Chimbuya, Sam & Collins, Kevin & Dent, Mark & Goss, John & Ison, Ray & Roggero, Pier Paolo & Seddaiu, Giovanna, 2014. "In search of systemic innovation for sustainable development: A design praxis emerging from a decade of social learning inquiry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 760-771.
    5. Frédéric CREPLET, 2004. "Les Portails d’entreprise : une réponse aux dimensions de l’entreprise « processeur de connaissances »," Working Papers of BETA 2004-07, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    6. Bouty, Isabelle & Gomez, Marie-Léandre, 2009. "The Social Dimensions of Idea Work in Haute Cuisine: A Bourdieusian Perspective," ESSEC Working Papers DR 09010, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    7. Feldman, Maryann P. & Kogler, Dieter F., 2010. "Stylized Facts in the Geography of Innovation," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 381-410, Elsevier.
    8. Luis Carvalho & Aurora A.C. Teixeira, 2011. "Where are the poor in International Economics?," FEP Working Papers 425, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    9. Maria Bengtsson & Anders Soderholm, 2002. "Bridging Distances: Organizing Boundary-spanning Technology Development Projects," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 263-274.
    10. Kassem HAMMOUD, 2020. "Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management in the Modern Society. A Systematic Review," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(3), pages 344-353, July.
    11. Müller, Felix Claus & Ibert, Oliver, 2014. "(Re-)Sources of Innovation: Understanding and Comparing Innovation Dynamics through the Lens of Communities of Practice," IRS Working Papers 52, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    12. Ogink, Ruben H.A.J. & Goossen, Martin C. & Romme, A. Georges L. & Akkermans, Henk, 2023. "Mechanisms in open innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    13. Sharath Sasidharan & Radhika Santhanam & Daniel J. Brass & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2012. "The Effects of Social Network Structure on Enterprise Systems Success: A Longitudinal Multilevel Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-1), pages 658-678, September.
    14. Daniel Geiger & Jochen Koch, 2008. "Von der individuellen Routine zur organisationalen Praktik — Ein neues Paradigma für die Organisationsforschung?," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 60(7), pages 693-712, November.
    15. Liubertė Irina, 2019. "On Social Knowledge and Its Empirical Investigation in Contemporary Organisations," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 81(1), pages 21-37, June.
    16. Suning Zhu & Ashish Gupta & David Paradice & Casey Cegielski, 2019. "Understanding the Impact of Immersion and Authenticity on Satisfaction Behavior in Learning Analytics Tasks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 791-814, August.
    17. Steven Toms, 2010. "Value, profit and risk: accounting and the resource‐based view of the firm," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(5), pages 647-670, June.
    18. Rocco Agrifoglio & Concetta Metallo & Primiano Nauta, 2021. "Understanding Knowledge Management in Public Organizations through the Organizational Knowing Perspective: a Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 137-156, March.
    19. TODERICIU Ramona & BOANTA Alexandra, 2017. "KNOWLEDGE AND BARRIERS TO THEIR TRANSFER TO SMEs," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 69(6), pages 90-95, December.
    20. Beth A. Bechky, 2003. "Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 312-330, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01300256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.