IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01062749.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Une analyse comparative des évaluations de politique de clusters en Europe : vers deux modèles idéal-typiques

Author

Listed:
  • Emilie-Pauline Gallié

    (IMRI, Université Paris Dauphine - Institut pour le management de la recherche et de l'innovation - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres)

  • Anna Glaser

    (CERNA i3 - Centre d'économie industrielle i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Frédérique Pallez

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

In this article, part of our research programme on cluster evaluations (cf. Gallié, Glaser, Lefebvre, & Pallez, 2012, which is an in-depth analyzes of the evaluation of the French policy of competitiveness clusters), we compare four European cluster evaluations: Wallonia, Germany, Lower Austria and France. We first develop a framework with which we then analyze these evaluations. This framework particularly helps us to underline the differences of these evaluations on three dimensions: the objects of the evaluations and the accountability of results, the approach and methodology of the evaluations, and finally the effects and uses of the evaluations. In conclusion, based on these empirical cases, we propose to distinguish two ideal-typical evaluation models that combine these different characteristics in a consistent manner and that point to two contrasted evaluation uses: an "economist" model and a "management model".

Suggested Citation

  • Emilie-Pauline Gallié & Anna Glaser & Frédérique Pallez, 2014. "Une analyse comparative des évaluations de politique de clusters en Europe : vers deux modèles idéal-typiques," Post-Print hal-01062749, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01062749
    DOI: 10.3166/pmp.31.87-111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olivier Coussi & Felipe Zarpelon & Kadígia Faccin & Alsones Balestrin, 2018. "Comprendre la diffusion d’une politique publique de promotion de la coopération entre PME au Brésil par la perspective relationnelle," Post-Print hal-02114084, HAL.
    2. Boumediene Amraoui & Abdesselam Ouhajjou & Salvatore Monni & Najiba El Amrani El Idrissi & Manuela TvaronaviÄ ienÄ—, 2019. "Performance of clusters in Morocco in the shifting economic and industrial reforms," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 1(3), pages 227-243, September.
    3. Olivier Coussi & Alsones Balestrin & Kadigia Faccin & Felipe Zarpelon, 2020. "The contributions of the relational view to understand the diffusion of a public policy for the promotion of cooperation between SMEs in Brazil [Les apports de la perspective relationnelle pour com," Post-Print hal-02974096, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01062749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.