IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00544625.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

VOIES NAVIGABLES ET DESSERTE PORTUAIRE Massifier les flux pour intégrer le transport fluvial dans les chaînes logistiques portuaires : étude des impacts économiques et environnementaux. Le cas du transport fluvial conteneurisé

Author

Listed:
  • Antoine Frémont

    (INRETS/SPLOTT - Systèmes productifs, logistique, organisation des transports et travail - INRETS - Institut National de Recherche sur les Transports et leur Sécurité)

  • Pierre Franc

    (INRETS/SPLOTT - Systèmes productifs, logistique, organisation des transports et travail - INRETS - Institut National de Recherche sur les Transports et leur Sécurité)

Abstract

Le programme de recherche partait de l'hypothèse que le transport fluvial combiné fleuveroute pour le transport de conteneurs pouvait s'imposer comme un mode de transport compétitif par rapport à la route à partir du moment où il jouait sur son principal atout qui était celui de la massification des flux. Grâce à nos travaux, nous avons pu mettre en évidence, notamment en nous appuyant sur l'exemple du transport des conteneurs sur la Seine que : le transport combiné fleuve route peut être compétitif en prix par rapport à la route, mais que cette compétitivité dépend de la destination géographique finale dans l'hinterland et du type de transport routier en concurrence ; la compétitivité en termes de prix n'est pas suffisante pour susciter un report modal de la route vers le fleuve. Ce mode de transport doit aussi proposer aux chargeurs des services additionnels, ce qui nécessite un opérateur de transport combiné proposant un service clé en main aux clients ; L'implication des armements maritimes au Havre est décisive pour comprendre l'essor du transport conteneurisé sur la Seine ; Cet essor du transport conteneurisé sur la Seine favorise un renforcement de l'hinterland du Havre sur le bassin parisien dans le cadre de la compétition interportuaire à l'échelle de la rangée Nord Europe ; comme pour les prix, la « compétitivité » du transport combiné fleuve-route par rapport à la route en matière énergétique varie en fonction de la destination géographique dans l'hinterland, du type de convoi fluvial utilisé et en fonction des formes organisationnelles du mode routier en concurrence

Suggested Citation

  • Antoine Frémont & Pierre Franc, 2008. "VOIES NAVIGABLES ET DESSERTE PORTUAIRE Massifier les flux pour intégrer le transport fluvial dans les chaînes logistiques portuaires : étude des impacts économiques et environnementaux. Le cas du tran," Post-Print hal-00544625, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00544625
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00544625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00544625/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elisabeth Gouvernal & Julien Daydou, 2005. "Container Railfreight Services in North‐west Europe: Diversity of Organizational Forms in a Liberalizing Environment," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 557-571, January.
    2. Photis M Panayides & Kevin Cullinane, 2002. "Competitive Advantage in Liner Shipping: A Review and Research Agenda," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 4(3), pages 189-209, September.
    3. Martijn R Van Der Horst & Peter W De Langen, 2008. "Coordination in Hinterland Transport Chains: A Major Challenge for the Seaport Community," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 10(1-2), pages 108-129, March.
    4. Ross Robinson, 2002. "Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 241-255.
    5. Trevor D Heaver, 2002. "The Evolving Roles of Shipping Lines in International Logistics," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 4(3), pages 210-230, September.
    6. Theo E. Notteboom & Willy Winkelmans, 2001. "Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge?," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 71-89, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:hal:wpaper:halshs-00741130 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frémont, Antoine & Franc, Pierre, 2010. "Hinterland transportation in Europe: Combined transport versus road transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 548-556.
    2. Franc, Pierre & Van der Horst, Martijn, 2010. "Understanding hinterland service integration by shipping lines and terminal operators: a theoretical and empirical analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 557-566.
    3. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2012. "Giving a direction to port regionalisation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1551-1561.
    4. Theo E. Notteboom & Hercules E. Haralambides, 2020. "Port management and governance in a post-COVID-19 era: quo vadis?," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 329-352, September.
    5. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2013. "The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 161-172.
    6. Notteboom, Theo E., 2010. "Concentration and the formation of multi-port gateway regions in the European container port system: an update," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 567-583.
    7. Y. H. Venus Lun & Kee‐Hung Lai & T. C. Edwin Cheng, 2008. "A Descriptive Framework for the Development and Operation of Liner Shipping Networks," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 439-457, August.
    8. Wilmsmeier, Gordon & Monios, Jason & Lambert, Bruce, 2011. "The directional development of intermodal freight corridors in relation to inland terminals," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1379-1386.
    9. Rodrigue, Jean-Paul & Notteboom, Theo, 2010. "Foreland-based regionalization: Integrating intermediate hubs with port hinterlands," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 19-29.
    10. Yap, Wei Yim & Lam, Jasmine S.L., 2006. "Competition dynamics between container ports in East Asia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 35-51, January.
    11. Marion Magnan & Martijn Horst, 2020. "Involvement of port authorities in inland logistics markets: the cases of Rotterdam, Le Havre and Marseille," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 102-123, March.
    12. Cullinane, Kevin, 2004. "1. Editorial: Key Themes In Shipping Economics Research," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Daniel Olivier & Brian Slack, 2006. "Rethinking the Port," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(8), pages 1409-1427, August.
    14. van Asperen, E. & Dekker, R., 2010. "Flexibility in Port Selection: A Quantitative Approach Using Floating Stocks," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2009-44, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    15. Wouter Jacobs & Theo Notteboom, 2011. "An Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Port Systems: The Role of Windows of Opportunity in Shaping Seaport Competition," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(7), pages 1674-1692, July.
    16. Robinson, Ross, 2004. "8. Liner Shipping Strategy, Network Structuring And Competitive Advantage: A Chain Systems Perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 247-289, January.
    17. Yang, Ching-Chiao & Marlow, Peter B. & Lu, Chin-Shan, 2009. "Assessing resources, logistics service capabilities, innovation capabilities and the performance of container shipping services in Taiwan," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 4-20, November.
    18. Caldeirinha, Vitor R. & Felicio, J. Augusto, 2011. "A influência dos factores de caracterização dos portos no desempenho, medido por indicadores operacionais, financeiros e de eficiência [The influence of factors characterizing the performance of po," MPRA Paper 30009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Notteboom, Theo & De Langen, Peter & Jacobs, Wouter, 2013. "Institutional plasticity and path dependence in seaports: interactions between institutions, port governance reforms and port authority routines," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 26-35.
    20. R. B. Castelein & H. Geerlings & J. H. R. Van Duin, 2019. "The ostensible tension between competition and cooperation in ports: a case study on intra-port competition and inter-organizational relations in the Rotterdam container handling sector," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-25, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00544625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.