IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00203655.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Telecommunications: understanding the dynamics of the organization of the industry

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Luc Gaffard

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Jackie Krafft

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the evolution of the telecommunications industry. Within the economic literature, different analytical assumptions are proposed, from a global sustainability of competition to the re-emergence of a stable oligopoly generated by a process of shakeout through mergers and acquisitions. In a nutshell, then, the understanding of the dynamics of the organization of the industry is still an open question with a multiplicity of answers. The main purpose of this paper is to clarify this timely debate, and to sustain that the organization of the industry is progressively evolving towards an oligopoly structure. The specificities of the argument developed in this paper are the following. Firstly, the paper confronts different analytical frameworks, namely mainstream and evolutionary-based, on key questions such as the successful entry and long term sustainability of new telecommunications carriers, as well as new actors such as Internet-related companies. Secondly, the paper analyses the industry as a broad system called ‘info-communications' and composed of ‘vertically-related' subsystems such as equipment suppliers, telecommunications carriers, Internet access and service providers, broadcasting and middleware groups. Thirdly, the paper analyzes past and current restructurings observed within this industry over the last twenty years, in order to infer reliable conclusions on the future evolution of this industry. Fourthly, the paper advocates that the evolution of the organization of the industry is highly connected to the characteristics of the innovative process and to the conditions of its implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Luc Gaffard & Jackie Krafft, 2001. "Telecommunications: understanding the dynamics of the organization of the industry," Post-Print hal-00203655, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00203655
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00203655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00203655/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Amendola & J. -L. Gaffard & P. Musso, 2000. "Competition, Innovation And Increasing Returns," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 149-181.
    2. Kano, Sadahiko, 2000. "Technical innovations, standardization and regional comparison -- a case study in mobile communications," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 305-321, May.
    3. Jackie Krafft & Jacques-Laurent Ravix, 2000. "Competition and industrial coordination," Post-Print hal-00212287, HAL.
    4. Amendola, Mario & Gaffard, Jean-Luc, 1994. "Markets and organizations as coherent systems of innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 627-635, November.
    5. Mark Armstrong & Simon Cowan & John Vickers, 1994. "Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British Experience," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262510790, April.
    6. Gong, Jiong & Srinagesh, Padmanabhan, 1996. "Network Competition and Industry Structure," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 5(4), pages 1231-1241.
    7. Armstrong, M., 1996. "Network interconnection," Discussion Paper Series In Economics And Econometrics 9625, Economics Division, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton.
    8. Mario Amendola & Jean-Luc Gaffard, 1988. "The innovative choice. An economic analysis of the dynamics of technology," Post-Print halshs-00420361, HAL.
    9. Klepper, Steven, 1997. "Industry Life Cycles," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 6(1), pages 145-181.
    10. Amendola, Mario & Gaffard, Jean-Luc, 1998. "Out of Equilibrium," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198293804.
    11. Jackie Krafft & Jacques-Laurent Ravix, 2000. "Competition and industrial coordination in Krafft J. (ed.)," Post-Print halshs-00464275, HAL.
    12. Richardson, G B, 1972. "The Organisation of Industry," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 82(327), pages 883-896, September.
    13. Katz, Michael L, 1996. "Remarks on the Economic Implications of Convergence," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 5(4), pages 1079-1095.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krafft, Jackie, 2004. "Frontières de la firme et de l’industrie : Les perspectives récentes issues de la rencontre entre l’histoire industrielle et l’économie industrielle," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 80(1), pages 109-135, Mars.
    2. Jackie Krafft, 2006. "Business history and the organization of industry," Post-Print hal-00211780, HAL.
    3. Amendola, M. & Froeschle, C. & Gaffard, J. -L. & Lega, E., 2001. "Round-about production, co-ordination failure, technological change, and the wage-employment dilemma," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Bougrain, Frederic & Haudeville, Bernard, 2002. "Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 735-747, July.
    5. Tommaso Ciarli & Marco Valente & Riccardo Leoncini & Sandro Montresor, 2009. "Technological change and the vertical organization of industries," Springer Books, in: Uwe Cantner & Jean-Luc Gaffard & Lionel Nesta (ed.), Schumpeterian Perspectives on Innovation, Competition and Growth, pages 115-135, Springer.
    6. Bianco, Antonio, 2015. "Out of Equilibrium: Bases, Basics, Policies, and Accounts," MPRA Paper 65850, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Marengo, Luigi, et al, 2000. "The Structure of Problem-Solving Knowledge and the Structure of Organizations," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 9(4), pages 757-788, December.
    8. Jackie Krafft, 2006. "Introduction: What do we know about Industrial Dynamics?," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 97(5), pages 13-19.
    9. Darcy W E Allen, 2020. "When Entrepreneurs Meet:The Collective Governance of New Ideas," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number q0269, August.
    10. Mario Amendola & Jean‐Luc Gaffard & Francesco Saraceno, 2004. "Wage Flexibility and Unemployment: The Keynesian Perspective Revisited," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 51(5), pages 654-674, November.
    11. Mario Amendola & Sergio Bruno & Jean-Luc Gaffard, 2010. "Hicks and Richardson on Industrial Change: Analysis and Policy," Chapters, in: Jean-Luc Gaffard & Evens Salies (ed.), Innovation, Economic Growth and the Firm, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Nicolai J. Foss, 1999. "Capabilities, Confusion, and the Costs of Coordination On Some Problems in Recent Research On Inter-Firm Relations," DRUID Working Papers 99-7, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    13. Cristiano Antonelli & Michel Quere, 2002. "The Governance of Interactive Learning within Innovation Systems," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(5-6), pages 1051-1063, May.
    14. Jackie Krafft & Jacques-Laurent Ravix, 2005. "The governance of innovative firms: An evolutionary perspective," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 125-147.
    15. Paolo Calvosa, 2021. "Entry, Exit and Innovation over the Industry Life Cycle in Converging Sectors: An Analysis of the Smartphone Industry," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(12), pages 151-151, July.
    16. Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro & Pier Saviotti, 2014. "Knowledge characteristics and the dynamics of technological alliances in pharmaceuticals: empirical evidence from Europe, US and Japan," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 587-622, July.
    17. Newbery, David M., 1997. "Privatisation and liberalisation of network utilities," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(3-5), pages 357-383, April.
    18. Horst Hanusch & Andreas Pyka, 2007. "Principles of Neo-Schumpeterian Economics," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 31(2), pages 275-289, March.
    19. Pier-Paolo Saviotti & Andreas Pyka¤ & Bogang Jun, 2020. "Diversification, structural change, and economic development," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1301-1335, November.
    20. Jean-Luc Gaffard, 2009. "Innovation, competition, and growth: Schumpeterian ideas within a Hicksian framework," Springer Books, in: Uwe Cantner & Jean-Luc Gaffard & Lionel Nesta (ed.), Schumpeterian Perspectives on Innovation, Competition and Growth, pages 7-23, Springer.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00203655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.