IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/gemptp/hal-04464964.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Artificial intelligence and algorithmic bias? Field tests on social network with teens

Author

Listed:
  • Grazia Cecere

    (IMT-BS - DEFI - Département Droit, Economie et Finances - TEM - Télécom Ecole de Management - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], LITEM - Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management (EA 7363) - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - Université Paris-Saclay - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

  • Clara Jean

    (EESC-GEM Grenoble Ecole de Management)

  • Fabrice Le Guel

    (RITM - Réseaux Innovation Territoires et Mondialisation - Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Matthieu Manant

    (RITM - Réseaux Innovation Territoires et Mondialisation - Université Paris-Saclay)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a general purpose technology that is used in many sectors. However, automated decision-making powered by AI algorithms can lead to unintended outcomes, especially in the context of online platforms. The lack of transparency related to AI algorithms and their categorization methods make practical insights into effective management of the risks associated to their utilization of crucial importance. We address these issues through two field tests aimed at mitigating biases in online science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education-related ads targeting teenagers. We conducted online ad campaigns involving gender-unspecific, women-specific, and gender-neutral ads targeted at young social network users. Our findings show that inclusion in the ad of a gender-oriented message tends to alleviate algorithmic gender bias but also reduced overall ad visibility. Our research shows also that text length has a significant impact on ad visibility, and that gender-oriented messages influence the display of the ad based on gender.

Suggested Citation

  • Grazia Cecere & Clara Jean & Fabrice Le Guel & Matthieu Manant, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and algorithmic bias? Field tests on social network with teens," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-04464964, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:gemptp:hal-04464964
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:gemptp:hal-04464964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.