IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gfe/pfrp00/00039.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Resilienza, innovazione e crescita: un modello teorico

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Salustri

    (Università Sapienza di Roma - Dipartimento di Studi Giuridici, Filosofici ed Economici)

Abstract

L’implementazione dell’Agenda 2030 implica l’attivazione di un processo di resilienza trasformativa come condizione necessaria ma non sufficiente a sostenere lo sviluppo sostenibile dei territori. In mancanza di capacità di resilienza, i processi di innovazione possono determinare, come effetto collaterale indesiderato, un aumento delle disuguaglianze e dei conflitti nel breve periodo, nonchè la maturazione di forme di path dependency nel lungo periodo che potrebbero mettere a rischio la sostenibilità delle scelte di sviluppo effettuate. D’altra parte, in assenza di capacità di innovazione, le forme di resilienza potrebbero favorire uno scambio iniquo tra obiettivi di breve e di lungo periodo, creando nuove vulnerabilità ed alimentando retroazioni negative a detrimento dello sviluppo. Sulla base di tali premesse, il collegamento tra gli Obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile (SDGs) e l’economia sociale e solidale (ESS) sembra essere in grado di promuovere l’adozione di approcci sinergici ed integrati in grado di connettere le dinamiche globali e le dinamiche locali a beneficio di uno sviluppo socio-economico-territoriale sostenibile. A sostegno del quadro di riferimento logico delineato, la ricerca presenta un modello macroeconomico di crescita con progresso tecnologico endogeno opportunamente modificato per tener conto del ruolo dell’ESS nell’ambito di un processo di crescita economica orientato al perseguimento degli Obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Salustri, 2019. "Resilienza, innovazione e crescita: un modello teorico," Public Finance Research Papers 39, Istituto di Economia e Finanza, DSGE, Sapienza University of Rome.
  • Handle: RePEc:gfe:pfrp00:00039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.dsge.uniroma1.it/sites/default/files/pubblicazioni/economia/e-pfrp39.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Easterlin, Richard A., 1974. "Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence," MPRA Paper 111773, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Andrea SALUSTRI & Federica VIGANÒ, 2018. "The contribution of the non-profit sector in narrowing spatial inequalities: Four cases of inter-institutional cooperation in Italy," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & CIRIEC (ed.), Providing public goods and commons. Towards coproduction and new forms of governance for a revival of public action, volume 1, chapter 1, pages 21-36, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    3. Salustri, Andrea & Viganò, Federica, 2017. "The non-profit sector as a foundation for the interaction among the social economy, the public sector and the market," MPRA Paper 78113, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Salustri, 2019. "The UN 2030 Agenda and Social and Solidarity Economy: toward a structural change?," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 18(2), pages 104-117, December.
    2. Andrea Salustri, 2021. "Social and solidarity economy and social and solidarity commons: Towards the (re)discovery of an ethic of the common good?," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(1), pages 13-32, March.
    3. Federica VIGANÒ & Andrea SALUSTRI, 2019. "Partnering with Civil Society Organizations. The role of volunteers and not for profit organizations in the provision of welfare services," CIRIEC Working Papers 1910, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    4. Fluhrer, Svenja & Kraehnert, Kati, 2022. "Sitting in the same boat: Subjective well-being and social comparison after an extreme weather event," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    5. Rojas, Mariano, 2011. "Poverty and psychological distress in Latin America," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 206-217, March.
    6. Senik, Claudia, 2009. "Direct evidence on income comparisons and their welfare effects," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 408-424, October.
    7. Proto, Eugenio & Rustichini, Aldo, 2012. "Life Satisfaction, Household Income and Personality Traits," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 86, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    8. Robert MacCulloch & Silvia Pezzini, 2010. "The Roles of Freedom, Growth, and Religion in the Taste for Revolution," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 53(2), pages 329-358, May.
    9. Yamada, Katsunori & Sato, Masayuki, 2013. "Another avenue for anatomy of income comparisons: Evidence from hypothetical choice experiments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 35-57.
    10. Alpizar, Francisco & Carlsson, Fredrik & Johansson-Stenman, Olof, 2005. "How much do we care about absolute versus relative income and consumption?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 405-421, March.
    11. Varvarigos, Dimitrios, 2011. "Non-monotonic welfare dynamics in a growing economy," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 303-312, June.
    12. Tofallis, Chris, 2020. "Which formula for national happiness?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    13. Wolfers, Justin & Stevenson, Betsey & Sacks, Dan, 2010. "Subjective Well-Being, Income, Economic Development and Growth," CEPR Discussion Papers 8048, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Stefano Bartolini & Francesco Sarracino, 2021. "Happier and Sustainable. Possibilities for a post-growth society," Department of Economics University of Siena 855, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    15. Hong, Yan-Zhen & Su, Yi-Ju & Chang, Hung-Hao, 2023. "Analyzing the relationship between income and life satisfaction of Forest farm households - a behavioral economics approach," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    16. M. Sirgy, 2011. "Theoretical Perspectives Guiding QOL Indicator Projects," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 103(1), pages 1-22, August.
    17. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/vbu6kd1s68o6r34k5bcm3iopv is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Yu-Chuan Chen & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang & Tai-Yu Lin, 2023. "Sustainable Development, Government Efficiency, and People’s Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1549-1578, April.
    19. Fredrik Carlsson & Olof Johansson‐Stenman & Peter Martinsson, 2007. "Do You Enjoy Having More than Others? Survey Evidence of Positional Goods," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 74(296), pages 586-598, November.
    20. Krzysztof Zagórski, 2011. "Income and Happiness in Time of Post-Communist Modernization," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 104(2), pages 331-349, November.
    21. Grace Wyshak, 2016. "Income and Subjective Well-Being: New Insights from Relatively Healthy American Women, Ages 49-79," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sviluppo sostenibile; Economia sociale e solidale; crescita economica.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gfe:pfrp00:00039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valeria De Bonis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ierosit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.