IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedkrw/95-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How reliable are adverse selection models of the bid-ask spread?

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Neal
  • Simon M. Wheatley

Abstract

Theoretical models of the adverse selection component of bid-asked spreads predict the component arises from asymmetric information about a firm's fundamental value. We test this prediction using two well known models [Glosten and Harris (1988) and George, Kaul, and Nimalendran (1991)] to estimate the adverse selection component for closed-end funds. Closed-end funds hold diversified portfolios and report their net asset values on a weekly basis. Thus, there should be little uncertainty about their fundamental values and their adverse selection components should be minimal. Estimates of the component from the two models, however, average 19 and 52 percent of the spread. These estimates, while smaller than corresponding estimates from common stocks, are large enough to raise doubts about the reliability of these models.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Neal & Simon M. Wheatley, 1995. "How reliable are adverse selection models of the bid-ask spread?," Research Working Paper 95-02, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedkrw:95-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard W. Sias, 1997. "Price Pressure And The Role Of Institutional Investors In Closed-End Funds," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 20(2), pages 211-229, June.
    2. Alford, Andrew W. & Jones, Jonathan D., 1998. "Financial reporting and information asymmetry: an empirical analysis of the SEC's information-supplying exemption for foreign companies," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 373-398, December.
    3. Flynn, Sean M., 2005. "Noise-trader Risk: Does it Deter Arbitrage, and Is it Priced?," Vassar College Department of Economics Working Paper Series 69, Vassar College Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Financial markets; Stock - Prices;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedkrw:95-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zach Kastens (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbkcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.