IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/euv/dpaper/27.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Die Einführung von marktbasierten Maßnahmen zur Emissionsbegrenzung im internationalen Flugverkehr unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Beschlüsse des ICAO

Author

Listed:
  • Denise Trebes

Abstract

Zusammenfassung (deutsch):

Die Klimaerwärmung schreitet unaufhörlich voran, so dass eine Regulierung der Treibhausgasemissionen großer Industriezweige unerlässlich ist. Einer der größten Verursacher von CO2-Emissionen ist der Transportsektor. Für den Flugsektor hat die ICAO daher eine globale marktbasierte Maßnahme, namens CORSIA beschlossen. Dabei handelt es sich um einen Offsetting-Mechanismus, mit dem die Emissionen des Flugsektors mit Hilfe von Zertifikaten aus umweltfreundlichen Projekten ausgeglichen werden sollen. Ziel CORSIAs ist es, ein kohlenstoffneutrales Wachstum ab 2020 zu gewährleisten und damit zu einer Emissionsreduktion beizutragen. Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war es, den Beschluss und die Effektivität von ICAOs marktbasierter Maßnahme zu analysieren. Die Untersuchungen haben ergeben, dass die derzeitige Ausgestaltung CORSIAs vermutlich nicht ausreichend ist, um eine Vereinbarkeit mit dem 1,5 Grad Ziel des Pariser Abkommens zu gewährleisten. Ursache hierfür sind im Wesentlichen die zu schwachen Regelungen des Offsetting-Systems. Dazu zählen die einseitige Betrachtung von ausschließlich CO2-Emissionen, die zahlreichen Ausnahmen von Nationen sowie der Zeithorizont CORSIAs, da die Maßnahme erst 2021 mit einer freiwilligen Phase beginnt.

Abstract (english):

The climate change is progressing incessantly. Hence, the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from large industrial sectors is indispensable. One of the main sources of carbon dioxide emissions is the transport sector. For aviation ICAO therefore adopted a global market-based measure called CORSIA. This offsetting mechanism will be used to offset emissions from the aviation sector with the help of certificates from environmental projects. The aim of CORSIA is to ensure carbon-neutral growth from 2020 onwards and thus contribute to a reduction in emissions. The aim of this work was to analyze the decision and effectiveness of ICAO’s market-based measure. The investigations have shown that the current design of CORSIA is probably not sufficient to ensure compatibility with the 1.5 degree objective of the Paris Convention. This is mainly because of the weak regulation of the offsetting system. These include the one-sided view of solely carbon dioxide emissions, the numerous exemptions of nations and the time horizon of CORSIA, since the measure begins with a voluntary phase in 2021.

Suggested Citation

  • Denise Trebes, 2017. "Die Einführung von marktbasierten Maßnahmen zur Emissionsbegrenzung im internationalen Flugverkehr unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Beschlüsse des ICAO," Discussion Paper Series RECAP15 27, RECAP15, European University Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder), revised May 2018.
  • Handle: RePEc:euv:dpaper:27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.europa-uni.de/de/forschung/institut/recap15/downloads/recap15_DP027.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2017
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jason A. D. Atkin & Geert De Maere & Edmund K. Burke & John S. Greenwood, 2013. "Addressing the Pushback Time Allocation Problem at Heathrow Airport," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 584-602, November.
    2. Stavins, Robert, 1998. "Market-Based Environmental Policies," RFF Working Paper Series dp-98-26, Resources for the Future.
    3. Jean-Paul Ceron & John Broderick & Paul Upham & Ghislain Dubois & Paul Peeters & Wolfgang Strasdas, 2007. "Voluntary carbon offsetting schemes for aviation : efficiency and dredibility," Post-Print hal-00527632, HAL.
    4. ., 2013. "Addressing poverty," Chapters, in: Strategic Public Private Partnerships, chapter 12, pages 134-146, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul R. Portney, 2000. "Environmental Problems and Policy: 2000-2050," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 199-206, Winter.
    2. Caginalp, Gunduz & Porter, David & Smith, Vernon, 2000. "Momentum and overreaction in experimental asset markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 187-204, January.
    3. Plevin, Richard J. & Delucchi, Mark A. & O’Hare, Michael, 2017. "Fuel carbon intensity standards may not mitigate climate change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 93-97.
    4. Parry, Ian & Pizer, William & Fischer, Carolyn, 2000. "How Important is Technological Innovation in Protecting the Environment?," RFF Working Paper Series dp-00-15, Resources for the Future.
    5. Moeltner, Klaus & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2003. "Voluntary Environmental Action and Export Destinations: The Case of Forest Certification," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(2), pages 1-14.
    6. Spash, Clive L. & Theine, Hendrik, 2016. "Voluntary Individual Carbon Trading," SRE-Discussion Papers 2016/04, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
      • Clive L. Spash & Hendrik Theine, 2016. "Voluntary Individual Carbon Trading," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2016_04, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    7. Hahn, Robert W., 2000. "The Impact of Economics on Environmental Policy," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 375-399, May.
    8. Fischer, Carolyn & Parry, Ian W. H. & Pizer, William A., 2003. "Instrument choice for environmental protection when technological innovation is endogenous," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 523-545, May.
    9. Jorge Araña & Carmelo León, 2013. "Can Defaults Save the Climate? Evidence from a Field Experiment on Carbon Offsetting Programs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 54(4), pages 613-626, April.
    10. Slaev, Aleksandar D. & Alexander, Ernest R. & Zdravkov, Zdravko & Ivanov, Valeri & Georgieva, Snezhina, 2022. "Market tools for the provision of urban green spaces in post-socialist Sofia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    11. Jeff Birchall, 2014. "New Zealand's abandonment of the Carbon Neutral Public Service programme," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 525-535, July.
    12. Olmstead, Sheila M. & Stavins, Robert N., 2008. "Comparing Price and Non-price Approaches to Urban Water Conservation," RFF Working Paper Series dp-08-22, Resources for the Future.
    13. Wadud, Zia, 2011. "Personal tradable carbon permits for road transport: Why, why not and who wins?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1052-1065.
    14. Bovenberg, A. Lans & Goulder, Lawrence H., 2002. "Environmental taxation and regulation," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 23, pages 1471-1545, Elsevier.
    15. Daniel Karapetyan & Jason A. D. Atkin & Andrew J. Parkes & Juan Castro-Gutierrez, 2017. "Lessons from building an automated pre-departure sequencer for airports," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 252(2), pages 435-453, May.
    16. Johan Warburg & Britta Frommeyer & Julia Koch & Sven‐Olaf Gerdt & Gerhard Schewe, 2021. "Voluntary carbon offsetting and consumer choices for environmentally critical products—An experimental study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3009-3024, November.
    17. Burtraw, Dallas, 2000. "Innovation Under the Tradable Sulfur Dioxide Emission Permits Program in the U.S. Electricity Sector," RFF Working Paper Series dp-00-38, Resources for the Future.
    18. Cristina Ciocirlan & Bruce Yandle, 2003. "The Political Economy of Green Taxation in OECD Countries," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 203-218, May.
    19. Bernard Effah & Ernest Boampong & Osei Asibey & Ninette Afi Pongo & Augustine Nkrumah, 2014. "Small and Medium Bamboo and Rattan Enterprises in Economic Empowerment in Kumasi: Perspectives of Producers," Journal of Social Economics, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 11-21.
    20. Milt, Austin W. & Armsworth, Paul R., 2017. "Performance of a cap and trade system for managing environmental impacts of shale gas surface infrastructure," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 399-406.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:euv:dpaper:27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dekanat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwffode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.