IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/09004.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Productivity Shocks and National Food Security for Japan

Author

Listed:
  • TANAKA Tetsuji
  • HOSOE Nobuhiro

Abstract

Agriculture is the focus of much contention in free trade negotiations. The Japanese government is against liberalizing the rice trade on the grounds that it would threaten "national food security" in the events of such shocks as crop failure, war, and embargo. Trade liberalization is expected to make Japan more dependent upon food imports and to make the Japanese economy more susceptible to these risks. Using a stochastic computable general equilibrium model, we conducted Monte Carlo simulations to quantify impact of rice productivity shocks and export quotas by major rice exporters to Japan and found little chance for trade liberalization for Japan to suffer from such shocks.

Suggested Citation

  • TANAKA Tetsuji & HOSOE Nobuhiro, 2009. "Productivity Shocks and National Food Security for Japan," Discussion papers 09004, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    • Handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:09004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/09e004.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Ataman Aksoy & John C. Beghin, 2005. "Global Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7464.
    2. Gail L. Cramer & James M. Hansen & Eric J. Wailes, 1999. "Impact of Rice Tariffication on Japan and the World Rice Market," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(5), pages 1149-1156.
    3. Jaime de MELO & Sherman ROBINSON, 2015. "Product Differentiation And The Treatment Of Foreign Trade In Computable General Equilibrium Models Of Small Economies," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Modeling Developing Countries' Policies in General Equilibrium, chapter 2, pages 21-41, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Devaragan, Shantayanan & Lewis, Jeffrey D. & Robinson, Sherman, 1990. "Policy lessons from trade-focused, two-sector models," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 625-657.
    5. Hertel, Thomas, 1997. "Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and applications," GTAP Books, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, number 7685, December.
    6. Nobuhiro Hosoe, 2004. "Crop failure, price regulation, and emergency imports of Japan's rice sector in 1993," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(10), pages 1051-1056.
    7. Yujiro Hayami & Yoshihisa Godo, 1997. "Economics and Politics of Rice Policy in Japan: A Perspective on the Uruguay Round," NBER Chapters, in: Regionalism versus Multilateral Trade Arrangements, pages 371-404, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Chern, Wen S. & Ishibashi, Kimiko & Taniguchi, Kiyoshi & Tokoyama, Yuki, 2002. "Analysis of food consumption behavior by Japanese households," ESA Working Papers 289108, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    9. Wen S. Chern & Colin A. Carter & Shun-Yi Shei (ed.), 2000. "Food Security in Asia," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2150.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tanaka, Tetsuji & Hosoe, Nobuhiro, 2011. "Does agricultural trade liberalization increase risks of supply-side uncertainty?: Effects of productivity shocks and export restrictions on welfare and food supply in Japan," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 368-377, June.
    2. Bruno Lanz & Thomas F. Rutherford, 2016. "GTAPINGAMS, version 9: Multiregional and small open economy models with alternative demand systems," IRENE Working Papers 16-08, IRENE Institute of Economic Research.
    3. Vos, R.P. & Ganuza, E. & Morley, S. & Robinson, S. & Pineiro, V., 2004. "Are export promotion and trade liberalization good for Latin America's poor? : a comparative macro-micro CGE analysis," ISS Working Papers - General Series 19158, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    4. Takahashi, Daisuke, 2012. "The distributional effect of the rice policy in Japan, 1986–2010," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 679-689.
    5. Koen Dillen & Emanuele Ferrari & Pascal Tillie & George Philippidis & Sophie Helaine, 2013. "Contribution to the economic impact assessment of policy options to regulate animal cloning for food production with an economic simulation model," JRC Research Reports JRC79995, Joint Research Centre.
    6. McDonald, Scott & Thierfelder, Karen & Walmsley, Terrie, 2013. "Capital Vintages and Technology Diffusion in Global Models," Conference papers 332384, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Scott McDonald & Sherman Robinson & Karen Thierfelder, 2007. "Globe: A SAM Based Global CGE Model using GTAP Data," Departmental Working Papers 14, United States Naval Academy Department of Economics.
    8. Abdella, Amin & Araige, Emerta & McDonald, Scott, 2013. "Food Price Shocks and their Impacts on Ethiopia: Policy Options to Lessen the Impacts on the Poor," Conference papers 332409, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. Shantong, Li & Jianwu, He, 2008. "Regional Energy/Envionmental Policy and Leakage Effect," Conference papers 331711, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    10. Haita, Corina, 2011. "An Emissions Trading Scheme with Auctioning," Conference papers 332086, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    11. Adkins, Liwayway G. & Garbaccio, Richard F., 2007. "Coordinating Global Trade and Environmental Policy: The Role of Pre-Existing Distortions," Conference papers 331592, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    12. McDonald, Scott & Thierfelder, Karen & Walmsley, Terrie, 2014. "Factor Market Flexibility and the Implications of Trade Policy Reforms," Conference papers 332469, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    13. Dimaranan, Betina V., 2006. "Trade Policy Options for the Philippines: A Preliminary Assessment," Conference papers 331528, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    14. Osman, Rehab Osman Mohamed, 2012. "The EU Economic Partnership Agreements with Southern Africa: a computable general equilibrium analysis," Economics PhD Theses 0412, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    15. McDonald, Scott & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2006. "Impact of switching production to bioenergy crops: The switchgrass example," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 243-265, March.
    16. Mutambatsere, Emelly, 2006. "Trade Policy Reforms in the Cereals Sector of the SADC Region: Implications on Food Security," Working Papers 127055, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    17. van Leeuwen, Nico, 2004. "Improving Capital Income Shares in the GTAP Database," Conference papers 331302, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    18. Sanchita Basu Das & Rahul Sen & Sadhana Srivastava, 2017. "A Partial Asean Customs Union Post 2015?," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 62(03), pages 593-617, June.
    19. McDonald, Scott & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2008. "Asian Growth and Trade Poles: India, China, and East and Southeast Asia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 210-234, February.
    20. Lewis, Jeffrey D. & Robinson, Sherman & Wang, Zhi, 1995. "Beyond the Uruguay Round: The implications of an Asian free trade area," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 35-90.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:09004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.