IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ete/vivwps/547283.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A test of the Law of 1/n for Belgium: Does “more politicians” mean “more public spending”?

Author

Listed:
  • Geert Jennes

Abstract

We investigate if a more populous or fragmented executive or legislative increases public spending, an effect known as “the Law of 1/n”. We test this for the supra-local governments of Belgium. On the basis of our dataset –including rather few “cross-sections” as well as rather few changes in our political variables of interest over time- we find few indications that more politicians or more fragmented governments lead to an increase in overall public expenditures. We find weak evidence in favour of a positive effect of a change in the size of the executive, more in particular of the number of ministers composing the governing coalition, on public spending. Our identification is based on an IV regression approach, instrumenting the number of ministers overall with their resp. number in governments in charge of a decentralisation round. Belgian governments in charge of a decentralisation round are constitutionally obliged to rely on broad parliamentary support, and therefore tend to be larger. We also find that there is no effect of a change in the size or fragmentation of the legislative on public spending.

Suggested Citation

  • Geert Jennes, 2015. "A test of the Law of 1/n for Belgium: Does “more politicians” mean “more public spending”?," Working Papers of VIVES - Research Centre for Regional Economics 547283, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), VIVES - Research Centre for Regional Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ete:vivwps:547283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/398399
    Download Restriction: KU Leuven intranet only, request a copy at https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/547283
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    distributive politics; public expenditures; fiscal federalism; politicians; political institutions;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ete:vivwps:547283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: library EBIB (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://feb.kuleuven.be/VIVES/vivesenglish/general/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.