IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/esj/esridp/258.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dealing with ZLB in DSGE models An application to the Japanese economy

Author

Listed:
  • ADJEMIAN Stéphane
  • JUILLARD Michel

Abstract

In this paper we propose an estimation strategy for DSGE models with occasionaly binding constraints, such as models with a zero lower bound for the nominal interest rate (ZLB). The usual likelihood approach is based on a first order approximation of the model around its deterministic steady state. This is not possible when we deal with a model with occasionally binding constraints, because the model is non differentiable everywhere and because, putting this first problem aside, the agents in the approximated model do not anticipate that the economy may hit the zero lower bound in the future. A medium scaled DSGE model with ZLB is estimated by the Simulated Method of Moments, using the Extended Path approach to simulate artificial time series for the observed variables. The Extended Path approach to simulation of stochastic forward{looking models, takes into account the full nonlinearities of the deterministic part of the model, but ignores the Jensen inequality. The extended path method is well suited for models including the zero lower bound because (contrary to the perturbation method) it does not rely on a strong smoothness assumption and so can handle problems with non differentiabilities. This approach proves to be feasible in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • ADJEMIAN Stéphane & JUILLARD Michel, 2010. "Dealing with ZLB in DSGE models An application to the Japanese economy," ESRI Discussion paper series 258, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:esj:esridp:258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/archive/e_dis/e_dis258/e_dis258.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Levin, Andrew & López-Salido, J David & Yun, Tack, 2007. "Strategic Complementarities and Optimal Monetary Policy," CEPR Discussion Papers 6423, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Gagnon, Joseph E, 1990. "Solving the Stochastic Growth Model by Deterministic Extended Path," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 8(1), pages 35-36, January.
    3. ADJEMIAN Stéphane & JUILLARD Michel, 2009. "Dealing with trends in DSGE models. An application to the Japanese economy," ESRI Discussion paper series 224, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    4. Dotsey, Michael & King, Robert G., 2005. "Implications of state-dependent pricing for dynamic macroeconomic models," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 213-242, January.
    5. Dixit, Avinash K & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1977. "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(3), pages 297-308, June.
    6. Frank Smets & Rafael Wouters, 2007. "Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycles: A Bayesian DSGE Approach," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(3), pages 586-606, June.
    7. David R.F. Love, 2009. "Accuracy of Deterministic Extended-Path Solution Methods for Dynamic Stochastic Optimization Problems in Macroeconomics," Working Papers 0907, Brock University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shantayanan Devarajan & Yazid Dissou & Delfin S. Go & Sherman Robinson, 2017. "Budget Rules and Resource Booms and Busts: A Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Analysis," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 31(1), pages 71-96.
    2. Andrew Binning & Junior Maih, 2016. "Implementing the Zero Lower Bound in an Estimated Regime-Switching DSGE Model," Working Papers No 3/2016, Centre for Applied Macro- and Petroleum economics (CAMP), BI Norwegian Business School.
    3. Ajevskis, Viktors, 2019. "Nonlocal Solutions To Dynamic Equilibrium Models: The Approximate Stable Manifolds Approach," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(6), pages 2544-2571, September.
    4. Braun, R. Anton & Körber, Lena Mareen, 2011. "New Keynesian dynamics in a low interest rate environment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 2213-2227.
    5. Andrew Binning & Junior Maih, 2017. "Modelling Occasionally Binding Constraints Using Regime-Switching," Working Paper 2017/23, Norges Bank.
    6. Martin M. Andreasen & Anders F. Kronborg, 2022. "The extended perturbation method: With applications to the New Keynesian model and the zero lower bound," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(3), pages 1171-1202, July.
    7. Devarajan, Shantayanan & Dissou, Yazid & Go, Delfin S. & Robinson, Sherman, 2014. "Budget rules and resource booms: A dynamic stochastic general equilibrium analysis," Conference papers 332455, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/3ug0u3qte39q7rqvbmij9rb993 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Martin M. Andreasen & Anders Kronborg, 2017. "The Extended Perturbation Method: New Insights on the New Keynesian Model," CREATES Research Papers 2017-14, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    10. Andrew Binning & Junior Maih, 2016. "Forecast uncertainty in the neighborhood of the effective lower bound: How much asymmetry should we expect?," Working Paper 2016/13, Norges Bank.
    11. Basu, Parantap & Wada, Kenji, 2023. "Unconventional monetary policy and the bond market in Japan: A new Keynesian perspective," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    12. Parantap Basu & Kenji Wada, 2018. "Unconventional Monetary Policy and the Bond Market in Japan: A New-Keynesian Perspective," IMES Discussion Paper Series 18-E-12, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan.
    13. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/3ug0u3qte39q7rqvbmij9rb993 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Costa Junior, Celso J. & Garcia-Cintado, Alejandro C. & Junior, Karlo Marques, 2021. "Macroeconomic policies and the pandemic-driven recession," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 438-465.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesper Lindé & Mathias Trabandt, 2018. "Should we use linearized models to calculate fiscal multipliers?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(7), pages 937-965, November.
    2. Harding, Martín & Lindé, Jesper & Trabandt, Mathias, 2022. "Resolving the missing deflation puzzle," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 15-34.
    3. Harding, Martín & Lindé, Jesper & Trabandt, Mathias, 2023. "Understanding post-COVID inflation dynamics," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(S), pages 101-118.
    4. Ricardo Nunes & Jinill Kim & Jesper Linde & Davide Debortoli, 2014. "Designing a Simple Loss Function for the Fed: Does the Dual Mandate Make Sense?," 2014 Meeting Papers 1043, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    5. Turino Francesco, 2010. "Non-Price Competition, Real Rigidities and Inflation Dynamics," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-61, July.
    6. Davide Debortoli & Jinill Kim & Jesper Lindé & Ricardo Nunes, 2019. "Designing a Simple Loss Function for Central Banks: Does a Dual Mandate Make Sense?," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 129(621), pages 2010-2038.
    7. Etro, Federico & Rossi, Lorenza, 2015. "New-Keynesian Phillips curve with Bertrand competition and endogenous entry," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 318-340.
    8. Levin, Andrew T. & David López-Salido, J. & Nelson, Edward & Yun, Tack, 2008. "Macroeconometric equivalence, microeconomic dissonance, and the design of monetary policy," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(Supplemen), pages 48-62, October.
    9. Renato Faccini & Leonardo Melosi, 2019. "Bad Jobs and Low Inflation," 2019 Meeting Papers 970, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    10. Furlanetto Francesco & Seneca Martin, 2009. "Fiscal Shocks and Real Rigidities," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-33, February.
    11. Maarten Dossche & Freddy Heylen & Dirk Van den Poel, 2010. "The Kinked Demand Curve and Price Rigidity: Evidence from Scanner Data," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 112(4), pages 723-752, December.
    12. Mr. Tobias Adrian & Christopher J. Erceg & Jesper Lindé & Pawel Zabczyk & Ms. Jianping Zhou, 2020. "A Quantitative Model for the Integrated Policy Framework," IMF Working Papers 2020/122, International Monetary Fund.
    13. Kamalyan, Hayk, 2022. "Real Rigidities and the Propagation of Uncertainty Shocks," MPRA Paper 116167, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Iania, Leonardo & Tretiakov, Pavel & Wouters, Rafael, 2023. "The risk premium in New Keynesian DSGE models: The cost of inflation channel," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Amano, Robert & Moran, Kevin & Murchison, Stephen & Rennison, Andrew, 2009. "Trend inflation, wage and price rigidities, and productivity growth," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 353-364, April.
    16. Tack Yun & Andrew Levin, 2009. "Reconsidering the Microeconomic Foundations of Price-Setting Behavior," 2009 Meeting Papers 798, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    17. SY Mouhamadou, 2015. "Working Paper 228 - Overborrowing and Balance of Payments Imbalances in a Monetary Union," Working Paper Series 2320, African Development Bank.
    18. Mouhamadou Sy, 2016. "Overborrowing and Balance of Payments Imbalances in a Monetary Union," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 67-98, February.
    19. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2016_016 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Etienne Gagnon & David López-Salido & Nicolas Vincent, 2013. "Individual Price Adjustment along the Extensive Margin," NBER Macroeconomics Annual, University of Chicago Press, vol. 27(1), pages 235-281.
    21. Jean Boivin & Marc P. Giannoni, 2006. "Has Monetary Policy Become More Effective?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 88(3), pages 445-462, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:esj:esridp:258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: HORI nobuko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esrgvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.