IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ese/iserwp/2013-04.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Understanding sources of social desirability bias in different modes: evidence from eye-tracking

Author

Listed:
  • Kaminska, Olena
  • Foulsham, Tom

Abstract

Our paper provides an empirical study of whether satisficing is related to social desirability bias using real-world eye-tracking. The method enables detecting latency of eye gazes in web, face-to-face and paper and pencil self-administered (SAQ) modes. Through these we infer respondents’ attention to question wording, socially desirable and socially undesirable response scale points. We link the gaze latency measures to responses to understand how respondents arrive at socially desirable or undesirable answers. We find that satisficing is related to social desirability bias in self-completion modes. Yet it does not explain the higher incidence of socially desirable responses in face-to-face mode.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaminska, Olena & Foulsham, Tom, 2013. "Understanding sources of social desirability bias in different modes: evidence from eye-tracking," ISER Working Paper Series 2013-04, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:ese:iserwp:2013-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/working-papers/iser/2013-04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shahidul Islam, 2021. "Impact Of Lottery Incentive On Response Rate And Data Quality: Evidence From Organic Food Consumption Survey Of Conventional Shoppers," Cultural Communication and Socialization Journal (CCSJ), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 68-74, November.
    2. Blom, Annelies G. & Burton, Jonathan & Booker, Cara L. & Cernat, Alexandru & Fairbrother, Malcolm & Jäckle, Annette & Kaminska, Olena & Keusch, Florian & Krosnick, Jon A. & Lynn, Peter & Oberski, Dan, 2015. "Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 7: Results from Methodological Experiments," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2015-03, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    3. Joachim Büschken & Ulf Böckenholt & Thomas Otter & Daniel Stengel, 2022. "Better Information From Survey Data: Filtering Out State Dependence Using Eye-Tracking Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(2), pages 620-665, June.
    4. Robert Neumann, 2016. "Understanding trustworthiness: using response latencies from CATI surveys to learn about the “crucial” variable in trust research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 43-64, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ese:iserwp:2013-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jonathan Nears (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rcessuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.