IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erg/wpaper/799.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of Urbanization on Political Outcomes in Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Cem Baslevent

    (Istanbul Bilgi University)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the urbanization–related determinants of two key political outcomes in Turkey, namely the election turnout rate and the vote share of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) which has been in power since 2002. We estimate regressions that include the outcomes as dependent variables and several socio-demographic indicators as explanatory variables. Making use of data available at both the province and district levels, we are able to observe nationwide patterns as well as those that apply in the province of Istanbul. The findings from the province level analysis reveal that the available indicators are reasonably good predictors of the dependent variables. It turns out that the urbanization rate was positively related with both of the outcomes. The findings in the vote share equation are in line with the hypothesis that the AKP has benefited from the existing living conditions of the urban population, especially in the metropolitan areas. The party has been particularly successful in identifying the worldviews and addressing the needs of conservative and generally-underprivileged masses of voters many of whom are first or second generation migrants. The district level analysis also yields results that are in line with our expectations regarding the socio-economic and cultural factors behind the AKP’s success. The high level of support for the party in parts of the province where lower-class native and migrant populations are concentrated is among the key findings of the econometric work. As previously argued in the literature, we attribute this success in part to the party’s prioritization of the provision of public services to the lower-class neighborhoods.

Suggested Citation

  • Cem Baslevent, 2013. "The Impact of Urbanization on Political Outcomes in Turkey," Working Papers 799, Economic Research Forum, revised Nov 2013.
  • Handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://erf.org.eg/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/799.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://bit.ly/2lO9qgQ
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tahire Erman, 2001. "The Politics of Squatter (Gecekondu) Studies in Turkey: The Changing Representations of Rural Migrants in the Academic Discourse," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(7), pages 983-1002, June.
    2. Ali T. AKARCA & Cem BAŞLEVENT, 2010. "The region-of-origin effect on voting behavior: The case of Turkey’s internal migrants," Iktisat Isletme ve Finans, Bilgesel Yayincilik, vol. 25(297), pages 9-36.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monika Streule & Ozan Karaman & Lindsay Sawyer & Christian Schmid, 2020. "Popular Urbanization: Conceptualizing Urbanization Processes Beyond Informality," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 652-672, July.
    2. Duygu Gokce & Fei Chen, 2018. "Sense of place in the changing process of house form: Case studies from Ankara, Turkey," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(4), pages 772-796, July.
    3. Ali Akarca & Aysit Tansel, 2015. "Impact of internal migration on political participation in Turkey," IZA Journal of Migration and Development, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Feyzan Erkip, 2003. "The Shopping Mall as an Emergent Public Space in Turkey," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 35(6), pages 1073-1093, June.
    5. Tahire Erman, 2016. "Formalization by the State, Re-Informalization by the People: A Gecekondu Transformation Housing Estate as Site of Multiple Discrepancies," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 425-440, March.
    6. Adriana Mihaela Soaita, 2013. "Romanian Suburban Housing: Home Improvement through Owner-building," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(10), pages 2084-2101, August.
    7. Bademci, H. Özden, 2012. "‘Working with vulnerable children’: Listening to the views of the service providers working with street children in Istanbul," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 725-734.
    8. Aylin Topal & Ozlem Celik & Galip Yalman, 2015. "Case study paper relating financialisation of the built environment to changing urban politics, social geographies, material flows and environmental improvement/degradation in Ankara," Working papers wpaper116, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    9. Cem Baslevent, 2013. "Socio-demographic determinants of the support for Turkey's Justice and Development Party," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 33(2), pages 1215-1228.
    10. Cem Baslevent & Hasan Kirmanoglu, 2015. "A Multilevel Analysis of Individuals' Attitudes Toward Welfare State Responsibilities," Working Papers 941, Economic Research Forum, revised Sep 2015.
    11. Ali Akarca & Aysit Tansel, 2015. "Impact of internal migration on political participation in Turkey," IZA Journal of Migration and Development, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Iban, Muzaffer Can, 2020. "Lessons from approaches to informal housing and non-compliant development in Turkey: An in-depth policy analysis with a historical framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Gülçin Erdi Lelandais, 2014. "Space and Identity in Resistance against Neoliberal Urban Planning in Turkey," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1785-1806, September.
    14. Utku Balaban, 2011. "The Enclosure of Urban Space and Consolidation of the Capitalist Land Regime in Turkish Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(10), pages 2162-2179, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sherine Ghoneim (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erfaceg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.