IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/era/wpaper/dp-2017-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Risks for ASEAN of New Mega-Agreements that Promote the Wrong Model of e-Commerce

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Kelsey

Abstract

Digital technology offers exciting new opportunities and advances for ASEAN member states, individually and as a region. The benefits have so far been captured by first movers, especially in the United States. ASEAN countries need time and flexibility to develop their own digital industrialization strategies that can harness the potential gains and minimize the risks, and regulate accordingly. This paper explains how that opportunity would be foreclosed by a new normative framework on electronic commerce and cross-border services that is being systematically advanced by developed countries on behalf of their globally dominant digital industries. Starting with the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, the template is being promoted through a network of mega-regional trade and investment agreements, including the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and potentially the World Trade Organization. Instead of delivering a digital dividend to ASEAN countries, this model of e-commerce could impede their development, create negative fiscal and employment consequences, and leave them dependent on an oligopoly of private corporations that control the global digital infrastructure and mass data. ASEAN member states will need to resist those proposals if they are to maintain their regulatory sovereignty and the policy space to capitalize on the 21st century digital revolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Kelsey, 2017. "The Risks for ASEAN of New Mega-Agreements that Promote the Wrong Model of e-Commerce," Working Papers DP-2017-10, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    • Handle: RePEc:era:wpaper:dp-2017-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eria.org/ERIA-DP-2017-10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adlung, Rudolf & Roy, Martin, 2005. "Turning hills into mountains? Current commitments under the GATS and prospects for change," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2005-01, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    2. Christopher J. S. Gentle, 1996. "European Financial Services," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: After Liberalisation, chapter 3, pages 46-59, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sigit Setiawan, 2018. "Negative List in Services Liberalization for ASEAN Developing Countries," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(5), pages 11-20.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Altunbas, Y. & Chakravarty, S. P., 1998. "Efficiency measures and the banking structure in Europe," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 205-208, August.
    2. Brian Burgoon & Panicos Demetriades & Geoffrey R D Underhill, 2008. "Financial Liberalisation and Political Variables: a response to Abiad and Mody," WEF Working Papers 0039, ESRC World Economy and Finance Research Programme, Birkbeck, University of London.
    3. Yvonne Wolfmayr, 2008. "Trade Barriers in Services and Competitive Strengths in the Austrian Service Sector. An Analysis at the Detailed Sector Level," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 34223, March.
    4. Dowlah Caf, 2012. "Mode 4 of WTO's General Agreement on Trade in Services: Can it spur Cross-Border Labor Mobility from Developing Countries?," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 56-82, December.
    5. Adlung, Rolf, 2005. "Public services and the GATS," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2005-03, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    6. Cole, Matthew T. & Guillin, Amélie, 2015. "The determinants of trade agreements in services vs. goods," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 66-82.
    7. Nordås, Hildegunn Kyvik, 2007. "International production sharing: A case for a coherent policy framework," WTO Discussion Papers 11, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    8. Triono Widodo, 2008. "Measuring output and value of financial services (banking): the case of Indonesia," IFC Bulletins chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), The IFC's contribution to the 56th ISI Session, Lisbon, August 2007, volume 28, pages 107-115, Bank for International Settlements.
    9. Milena Kern & Jörg Paetzold & Hannes Winner, 2021. "Cutting red tape for trade in services," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(10), pages 2858-2886, October.
    10. Rajeev Ahuja, 2005. "Towards Developing Subsidy Disciplines under GATS," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 174, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    11. Werner Raza, 2016. "Politics of scale and strategic selectivity in the liberalisation of public services – the role of trade in services," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 204-219, March.
    12. Marianne Ojo, 2007. "The Financial Services Authority: A Model of Improved Accountability?," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 1(1), pages 83-96.
    13. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2003_005 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Stephan Schulmeister, 2009. "A General Financial Transaction Tax: A Short Cut of the Pros, the Cons and a Proposal," WIFO Working Papers 344, WIFO.
    15. Rajesh Chadha & Geethanjali Nataraj, 2008. "Trade in Services and Investment Flows in South Asia," EABER Working Papers 21796, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    16. Manders, Ton & Bollen, Johannes & Dave, Rutu, 2007. "Trade sanctions and Climate Policy," Conference papers 331617, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    17. Ivana Prica & Jelica Petrović Vujačić, 2010. "Financial Services Liberalisation in Transition Countries and the Role of the WTO," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 57(4), pages 487-501, December.
    18. Simo Regis Y., 2013. "Integrating African Markets into the Global Exchange of Services: A Central African Perspective," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 255-297, September.
    19. repec:wsr:ecbook:2008:i:i-007 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Clemens Sager, 2006. "Productivity and Income-Redistribution Impacts of Banking Liberalisation in Europe - An Empirical Analysis Based on the Melitz Model\par," IHEID Working Papers 14-2006, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
    21. Philipp Lamprecht & Sébastien Miroudot, 2020. "The value of market access and national treatment commitments in services trade agreements," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(11), pages 2880-2904, November.
    22. Altunbas, Y. & Chakravarty, S. P., 2001. "Frontier cost functions and bank efficiency," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 233-240, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    e-commerce; ASEAN; mega FTAs; WTO; RCEP;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:era:wpaper:dp-2017-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ranti Amelia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eriadid.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.