IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eps/cepswp/11922.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Brexit Negotiations: An Italian Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Micossi, Stefano
  • Perissich, Riccardo

Abstract

This paper attempts to map out Italy’s interests in the forthcoming Brexit negotiations, based on a number of economic and political hypotheses regarding what the UK’s opening position might be. In recent years, Italy has become a country of emigration again, with qualified young people seeking better paid and more rewarding jobs elsewhere in the EU. For this reason, Italy will mount a strong defence of existing internal market rules as an inseparable set of principles. This is not to say that Italy will not be helpful in the forthcoming Brexit negotiations, but there will be strict limits to its flexibility. Concessions to the UK’s demands for restrictions on labour mobility for EU citizens are likely to be opposed. An earlier version of this paper appears as a chapter in a VOX e-book entitled: What To Do With the UK? EU Perspectives on Brexit edited by Charles Wyplosz, and is published here with the kind permission of VOX.

Suggested Citation

  • Micossi, Stefano & Perissich, Riccardo, 2016. "The Brexit Negotiations: An Italian Perspective," CEPS Papers 11922, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:11922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/S%20Micossi%20Italian%20view%20of%20Brexit%20CEPS%20Commentary.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karel Lannoo, 2016. "EU Financial Market Access after Brexit," CEPS Papers 11876, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    2. Lannoo, Karel, 2016. "EU Financial Market Access after Brexit," ECMI Papers 11876, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    3. Karel Lannoo, 2016. "EU Financial Market Access After Brexit," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 51(5), pages 255-260, September.
    4. Ferrer, Jorge N��ez & Rinaldi, David, 2016. "The Impact of Brexit on the EU Budget: A non-catastrophic event," CEPS Papers 11814, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stahl, B.C. & Andreou, A. & Brey, P. & Hatzakis, T. & Kirichenko, A. & Macnish, K. & Laulhé Shaelou, S. & Patel, A. & Ryan, M. & Wright, D., 2021. "Artificial intelligence for human flourishing – Beyond principles for machine learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 374-388.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bofinger, Peter & Feld, Lars P. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Schnabel, Isabel & Wieland, Volker, 2018. "Vor wichtigen wirtschaftspolitischen Weichenstellungen. Jahresgutachten 2018/19 [Setting the Right Course for Economic Policy. Annual Report 2018/19]," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201819.
    2. Yutaka Kurihara, 2017. "The Impact of ‘Brexit’ on Japanese International Trade in EU," Business, Management and Economics Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 3(6), pages 57-61, 06-2017.
    3. Matthes, Jürgen & Busch, Berthold, 2016. "Was kommt nach dem Brexit? Erwägungen zum zukünftigen Verhältnis zwischen der Europäischen Union und dem Vereinigten Königreich," IW-Reports 37/2016, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    4. Gabriel Felbermayr & Clemens Fuest & Jasmin Katrin Gröschl & Daniel Stöhlker, 2017. "Economic Effects of Brexit on the European Economy," EconPol Policy Reports 4, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    5. Hosoe, Nobuhiro, 2018. "Impact of border barriers, returning migrants, and trade diversion in Brexit: Firm exit and loss of variety," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 193-204.
    6. Peter Becker & Jörg Haas & Carsten Hefeker & Steffen Hindelang & Eberhard Eichenhofer & Christian Tietje & Susanne Wixforth & Nicolai von Ondarza & René Repasi & Klaus Günter Deutsch & Stefan Mair & G, 2017. "Die Verhandlungen zum Brexit: Finanzielle und wirtschaftliche Auswirkungen," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 70(11), pages 03-40, June.
    7. Svetla Boneva & Filip Petkov, 2020. "The Multiannual Financial Framework of the European Union after 2020," Business & Management Compass, University of Economics Varna, issue 3, pages 256-272.
    8. Friedrich Heinemann, 2017. "The Case for Co-Financing the CAP," EconPol Working Paper 4, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    9. Emmanuel Brunet-Jailly, 2021. "Introduction: How the British-exit is Impacting the European Union?," International Studies, , vol. 58(2), pages 133-149, April.
    10. Oliver Mas, 2018. "Brexit No Deal: The Budgetary Impact on CAP - Greece and the EU27," Working Papers 2018-4, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    11. Behm, Philipp, 2017. "Fiskalische Konsequenzen des Brexit," DSi kompakt 29, DSi - Deutsches Steuerzahlerinstitut des Bundes der Steuerzahler e.V., Berlin.
    12. Maria Nica & Ionut Laurentiu Petre, 2018. "A smaller union, a larger budget per member state," International Conference on Competitiveness of Agro-food and Environmental Economy Proceedings, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 7, pages 240-248.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:11922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Margarita Minkova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepssbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.