IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureri/7020.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Relative View on Tracking Error

Author

Listed:
  • Hallerbach, W.G.P.M.
  • Pouchkarev, I.

Abstract

When delegating an investment decisions to a professional manager, investors often anchor their mandate to a specific benchmark. The manager’s exposure to risk is controlled by means of a tracking error volatility constraint. It depends on market conditions whether this constraint is easily met or violated. Moreover, the performance of the portfolio depends on market conditions. In this paper we argue that these mandated portfolios should not only be evaluated relative to their benchmarks in order to appraise their performance. They should also be evaluated relative to the opportunity set of all portfolios that can be formed under the same mandate – the portfolio opportunity set. The distribution of performance values over the portfolio opportunity set depends on contemporary market dynamics. To correct for this, we suggest a normalized version of the information ratio that is invariant to these market conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Hallerbach, W.G.P.M. & Pouchkarev, I., 2005. "A Relative View on Tracking Error," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-063-F&A, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureri:7020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/7020/ERS%202005%20063%20F&A.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander, Gordon J. & Baptista, Alexandre M., 2008. "Active portfolio management with benchmarking: Adding a value-at-risk constraint," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 779-820, March.
    2. Ritov, Y., 1989. "Monte Carlo computation of the mean of a function with convex support," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 269-277, February.
    3. Robert L. Smith, 1984. "Efficient Monte Carlo Procedures for Generating Points Uniformly Distributed over Bounded Regions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 1296-1308, December.
    4. Fisher, Lawrence & Lorie, James H, 1970. "Some Studies of Variability of Returns on Investments in Common Stocks," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(2), pages 99-134, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luca Anzilli & Silvio Giove, 2020. "Multi-criteria and medical diagnosis for application to health insurance systems: a general approach through non-additive measures," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(2), pages 559-582, December.
    2. Corrente, Salvatore & Figueira, José Rui & Greco, Salvatore, 2014. "The SMAA-PROMETHEE method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 514-522.
    3. Stephen Baumert & Archis Ghate & Seksan Kiatsupaibul & Yanfang Shen & Robert L. Smith & Zelda B. Zabinsky, 2009. "Discrete Hit-and-Run for Sampling Points from Arbitrary Distributions Over Subsets of Integer Hyperrectangles," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 727-739, June.
    4. Hazan, Aurélien, 2017. "Volume of the steady-state space of financial flows in a monetary stock-flow-consistent model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 473(C), pages 589-602.
    5. Dimitris Bertsimas & Allison O'Hair, 2013. "Learning Preferences Under Noise and Loss Aversion: An Optimization Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1190-1199, October.
    6. David Bradfield & Brian Munro, 2017. "The number of stocks required for effective portfolio diversification: the South African case," South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 44-59, January.
    7. Matteo Del Vigna, 2011. "Ambiguity made easier," Working Papers - Mathematical Economics 2011-07, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    8. Palomba, Giulio & Riccetti, Luca, 2012. "Portfolio frontiers with restrictions to tracking error volatility and value at risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 2604-2615.
    9. Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Rezaei, Jafar, 2024. "Better decisions with less cognitive load: The Parsimonious BWM," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    10. Qi Fan & Jiaqiao Hu, 2018. "Surrogate-Based Promising Area Search for Lipschitz Continuous Simulation Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 677-693, November.
    11. Reuven Rubinstein, 2009. "The Gibbs Cloner for Combinatorial Optimization, Counting and Sampling," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 491-549, December.
    12. Jing Voon Chen & Julia L. Higle & Michael Hintlian, 2018. "A systematic approach for examining the impact of calibration uncertainty in disease modeling," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 541-561, October.
    13. Stucchi, Patrizia, 2015. "A unified approach to portfolio selection in a tracking error framework with additional constraints on risk," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 165-174.
    14. Luis V. Montiel & J. Eric Bickel, 2014. "A Generalized Sampling Approach for Multilinear Utility Functions Given Partial Preference Information," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 147-170, September.
    15. James, Nick & Menzies, Max & Gottwald, Georg A., 2022. "On financial market correlation structures and diversification benefits across and within equity sectors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 604(C).
    16. Kiatsupaibul, Seksan & J. Hayter, Anthony & Liu, Wei, 2017. "Rank constrained distribution and moment computations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 229-242.
    17. Pavel Shcherbakov & Mingyue Ding & Ming Yuchi, 2021. "Random Sampling Many-Dimensional Sets Arising in Control," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Riza Demirer & Donald Lien, 2004. "Firm-level return dispersion and correlation asymmetry: challenges for portfolio diversification," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(6), pages 447-456.
    19. Brunelli, Matteo & Corrente, Salvatore, 2024. "Modeling criteria and project interactions in portfolio decision analysis with the Choquet integral," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    20. Etienne de Klerk & Monique Laurent, 2018. "Comparison of Lasserre’s Measure-Based Bounds for Polynomial Optimization to Bounds Obtained by Simulated Annealing," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 1317-1325, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Benchmarking; Information Ratio; Performance Evaluation; Tracking Error;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance
    • M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureri:7020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erimanl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.