IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureir/1383.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The break quantity rule in a 1-warehouse, N-retailers distribution system

Author

Listed:
  • Dekker, R.
  • Kleijn, M.J.
  • de Kok, A.G.

Abstract

In this paper the effect of the break quantity rule on the inventory costs in a 1-warehouse, N-retailers distribution system is analyzed. The break quantity rule is to deliver large orders from the warehouse, and small orders from the nearest retailer, where a so--called break quantity determines whether an order is small or large. Under the assumptions that the stock at the warehouse can only be used to satisfy large orders, and that demand during the leadtimes is normally distributed, an expression for the inventory costs is derived. The objective of this paper is to provide insight into the effect of the break quantity rule on the inventory holding costs, and therefore we present extensive computational results, showing that in many cases the rule leads to a significant cost reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Dekker, R. & Kleijn, M.J. & de Kok, A.G., 1996. "The break quantity rule in a 1-warehouse, N-retailers distribution system," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 9624-/A, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:1383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/1383/1383.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew J. Clark & Herbert Scarf, 2004. "Optimal Policies for a Multi-Echelon Inventory Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1782-1790, December.
    2. Leroy B. Schwarz, 1989. "A Model for Assessing the Value of Warehouse Risk-Pooling: Risk-Pooling Over Outside-Supplier Leadtimes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(7), pages 828-842, July.
    3. Awi Federgruen & Paul Zipkin, 1984. "Approximations of Dynamic, Multilocation Production and Inventory Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 69-84, January.
    4. H. Jönsson & E. A. Silver, 1987. "Analysis of a Two-Echelon Inventory Control System with Complete Redistribution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 215-227, February.
    5. Dekker, R. & Frenk, J.B.G. & Kleijn, M.J. & Piersma, N. & de Kok, T.G., 1995. "On the use of break quantities in multi--echelon distribution systems," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 9548-/A, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    6. Peter L. Jackson, 1988. "Stock Allocation in a Two-Echelon Distribution System Or "What to Do Until Your Ship Comes In"," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(7), pages 880-895, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dekker, R. & Kleijn, M. J. & de Kok, A. G., 1998. "The break quantity rule's effect on inventory costs in a 1-warehouse, N-retailers distribution system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 61-68, September.
    2. Sven Axsäter & Johan Marklund & Edward A. Silver, 2002. "Heuristic Methods for Centralized Control of One-Warehouse, N-Retailer Inventory Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 75-97, October.
    3. Yossi Aviv & Awi Federgruen, 2001. "Design for Postponement: A Comprehensive Characterization of Its Benefits Under Unknown Demand Distributions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 578-598, August.
    4. De‐bi Cao & Edward A. Silver, 2005. "A dynamic allocation heuristic for centralized safety stock," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(6), pages 513-526, September.
    5. Johan Marklund & Kaj Rosling, 2012. "Lower Bounds and Heuristics for Supply Chain Stock Allocation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 92-105, February.
    6. Ahire, Sanjay L. & Schmidt, Charles P., 1996. "A model for a Mixed Continuous-Periodic Review One-Warehouse, N-Retailer inventory system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 69-82, July.
    7. Ankur Goel & Genaro J. Gutierrez, 2011. "Multiechelon Procurement and Distribution Policies for Traded Commodities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(12), pages 2228-2244, December.
    8. Bollapragada, rinivas & Akella, Ram & Srinivasan, Ramesh, 1998. "Centralized ordering and allocation policies in a two-echelon system with non-identical warehouses," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 74-81, April.
    9. de Kok, Ton & Grob, Christopher & Laumanns, Marco & Minner, Stefan & Rambau, Jörg & Schade, Konrad, 2018. "A typology and literature review on stochastic multi-echelon inventory models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 955-983.
    10. Graves, Stephen C., 1989. "A multi-echelon inventory model with fixed reorder intervals," Working papers 3045-89., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    11. Fujiwara, Okitsugu & Soewandi, Hanijanto & Sedarage, Dayani, 1997. "An optimal ordering and issuing policy for a two-stage inventory system for perishable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 412-424, June.
    12. Huaxiao Shen & Tian Tian & Han Zhu, 2019. "A Two-Echelon Inventory System with a Minimum Order Quantity Requirement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    13. Agrawal, Vipul & Chao, Xiuli & Seshadri, Sridhar, 2004. "Dynamic balancing of inventory in supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(2), pages 296-317, December.
    14. Lucy Gongtao Chen & Srinagesh Gavirneni, 2010. "Using Scheduled Ordering to Improve the Performance of Distribution Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(9), pages 1615-1632, September.
    15. Verrijdt, J. H. C. M. & de Kok, A. G., 1995. "Distribution planning for a divergent N-echelon network without intermediate stocks under service restrictions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(2-3), pages 225-243, March.
    16. van der Heijden, Matthieu C., 1999. "Multi-echelon inventory control in divergent systems with shipping frequencies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 331-351, July.
    17. Howard, Christian & Marklund, Johan, 2011. "Evaluation of stock allocation policies in a divergent inventory system with shipment consolidation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(2), pages 298-309, June.
    18. Geert-Jan van Houtum & Alan Scheller-Wolf & Jinxin Yi, 2007. "Optimal Control of Serial Inventory Systems with Fixed Replenishment Intervals," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 674-687, August.
    19. Tibben-Lembke, Ronald S. & Bassok, Yehuda, 2005. "An inventory model for delayed customization: A hybrid approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(3), pages 748-764, September.
    20. Peter L. Jackson & John A. Muckstadt & Yuexing Li, 2019. "Multiperiod Stock Allocation via Robust Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 794-818, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:1383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feeurnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.