IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehs/wpaper/9004.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

US-Portuguese trade in the era of the first real world war and beyond: instability and opportunity, 1796-1831

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Moreira

    (Universidade do Minho)

  • Jari Eloranta

    (Appalachian State University)

Abstract

"The transition from the end of the eighteenth century to the first decades of the nineteenth century was marked by political instability in Europe. The expansion of the ideals of the French revolution, and the spread of the global war driven by aggressive Napoleonic France caused deep instability in Europe. Across the Atlantic, other wars were giving birth to new nations and the world was facing tremendous changes. The understanding of the trade relations between US and Portugal from 1796 to 1831 can contribute to a deeper insight into an understudied period in terms of international trade. Overcoming a major lack of studies regarding trade relations between Portugal and the United States in this period, we have created a new database in this article, based on new Portuguese sources. We then analyzed the trade relations in conjunction with American quantitative data and several qualitative sources. This paper taps into an important field of analysis, namely the discussion of the economic impacts of war on trade as well as the role of smaller (“weaker”) states in wartime situations. Many scholars have recently analyzed the disruptions caused by major conflicts like the world wars. And recent scholarship certainly puts the revolutionary wars and the ensuing Napoleonic conflicts into the same category. However, these scholars have paid relatively little attention to the smaller players in these wars, often assuming that they occupied an insignificant role in the conflict. Portugal, in particular, suffered three French invasions during Napoleon’s rule, and, since it did not adhere to the Continental blockade, it experienced trade restrictions with several of its former suppliers. Initially, the United States became a major trading partner for Portugal, despite its strained relations with an ally of Portugal, Great Britain, became a key supplier for the Portuguese market. However, after 1812, the war pitting United States against England brought new difficulties for the US-Portuguese trade, as US shipments with cereals and flour were frequently captured by England. The reversal of the political situation after the second defeat of Napoleon and the Congress of Vienna once again changed the external environment for trade. In this paper we want to analyze the changes in the Portuguese trade relations, both in terms of goods exchanged and the policies, with the United States during an extremely turbulent period in history. We want to explore the following questions: 1) What kinds of changes do we see in the trade flows between these two countries, especially whether the pressure of the war effort allowed more latitude for Portugal to explore its trade options; 2) Do we see substantial changes in the types of goods exchanged over this complex period? 3) What was the significance of this trade for both countries? In sum, the exchange of American cereals for Portuguese goods, in a context of the deep instability that existed in the early nineteenth century, can be assumed to have linked both sides of the Atlantic Ocean in mutually beneficial trade. Yet, the context of this trade and its impact needs to be studied in detail, which is indeed our goal."

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Moreira & Jari Eloranta, 2009. "US-Portuguese trade in the era of the first real world war and beyond: instability and opportunity, 1796-1831," Working Papers 9004, Economic History Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:9004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ehs.org.uk/dotAsset/95551809-616e-4f14-8fbd-e0c4bd586a98.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reuven Glick & Alan M. Taylor, 2010. "Collateral Damage: Trade Disruption and the Economic Impact of War," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 92(1), pages 102-127, February.
    2. O’Rourke, Kevin H, 2006. "The worldwide economic impact of the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, 1793–1815," Journal of Global History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 123-149, March.
    3. Reuven Glick & Alan M. Taylor, 2010. "Collateral Damage: Trade Disruption and the Economic Impact of War," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 92(1), pages 102-127, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nils‐Petter Lagerlöf & Thomas Tangerås, 2008. "From rent seeking to human capital: a model where resource shocks cause transitions from stagnation to growth," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 760-780, August.
    2. Xuepeng Liu, 2009. "GATT/WTO Promotes Trade Strongly: Sample Selection and Model Specification," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(3), pages 428-446, August.
    3. Daniel Mirza & Thierry Verdier, 2014. "Are Lives a Substitute for Livelihoods? Terrorism, Security, and US Bilateral Imports," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 58(6), pages 943-975, September.
    4. Halkos, George E. & Aslanidis, Panagiotis – Stavros C., 2023. "Sustainable energy development in an era of geopolitical multi-crisis. Applying productivity indices within institutional framework," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    5. Bonginkosi Mamba & André C Jordaan & Matthew Clance, 2015. "Globalisation and Conflicts: A Theoretical Approach," Working Papers 201555, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    6. Verdier, Thierry, 2010. "Ouverture, conflits et capacité étatique : une perspective d’économie politique," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 86(4), pages 415-449, décembre.
    7. Khaled Bennour, 2009. "The value of rents and the likelihood of conflicts," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 56(2), pages 163-173, June.
    8. S. Brock Blomberg & Rozlyn C. Engel, 2012. "Lines in the Sand: Price Dispersion across Iraq's Intranational Borders before, during, and after the Surge," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 55(3), pages 503-538.
    9. Lagerlöf, Nils-Petter & Tangerås, Thomas, 2005. "Human Capital, Rent Seeking, and a Transition from Stagnation to Growth," Working Paper Series 656, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    10. repec:got:cegedp:113 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Fuchs, Andreas & Klann, Nils-Hendrik, 2013. "Paying a visit: The Dalai Lama effect on international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 164-177.
    12. Jong-Wha Lee & Ju Hyun Pyun, 2016. "Does Trade Integration Contribute to Peace?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 327-344, February.
    13. Ronald Umali Mendoza & Charles Siriban & Tea Jalin Ty, 2019. "Survey Of Economic Implications Of Maritime And Territorial Disputes," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 1028-1049, July.
    14. Philippe Aghion & Xavier Jaravel & Torsten Persson & Dorothée Rouzet, 2019. "Education and Military Rivalry," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 376-412.
    15. Scott L. Kastner, 2007. "When Do Conflicting Political Relations Affect International Trade?," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 51(4), pages 664-688, August.
    16. Michal Rigel, 2020. "War and Philosophy: A Study of Mutual Interaction," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(2), pages 46-56.
    17. Jong-Wha Lee & Ju Hyun Pyun, 2016. "Does Trade Integration Contribute to Peace?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 327-344, February.
    18. Hicks Michael J. & Smith Jeff, 2009. "Warfare, Civil Conflict and the Spatial Impacts on Domestic Investment: Evidence from South America, 1950-2000," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 102-113, November.
    19. Gunes Gokmen, 2012. "Economic Clash? The Role of Cultural Cleavages in Bilateral Trade Relations," EcoMod2012 4252, EcoMod.
    20. Magnus Hoffmann, 2010. "Enforcement of property rights in a barter economy," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 34(2), pages 249-263, February.
    21. Vincent Vicard, 2006. "Trade, Conflicts, and Political Integration: the Regional Interplays," CESifo Working Paper Series 1839, CESifo.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N00 - Economic History - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:9004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.