IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/64162.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A tripartite conceptualisation of urban public space as a site for play: evidence from South Bank, London

Author

Listed:
  • Jones, Alasdair

Abstract

Public space is a feature of the urban built environment that has received increasing attention in recent years. Discussion has focused on the theoretical decline of public space, as private and institutional forces take on increasing influence. At the same time, many such “in-between spaces,” even privately owned ones, are used and experienced as public on a daily basis. Few studies, however, have explored how spaces understood as public are used and practised as such. To address this gap in the literature this paper draws upon ethnographic data collected on the “South Bank” in London (United Kingdom) to argue that “play” is a recurrent trait of sociospatial practices enacted in public space. Three interrelated typologies of playful practices in public space are discussed: child's play, plays on meaning, and play as simulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jones, Alasdair, 2013. "A tripartite conceptualisation of urban public space as a site for play: evidence from South Bank, London," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64162, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:64162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/64162/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monica Degen, 2003. "Fighting for the global catwalk: formalizing public life in Castlefield (Manchester) and diluting public life in el Raval (Barcelona)," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 867-880, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Albert S. Fu & Martin J. Murray, 2014. "Glorified Fantasies and Masterpieces of Deception on Importing Las Vegas into the ‘New South Africa’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 843-863, May.
    2. repec:bla:ijurrs:v:29:y:2005:i:1:p:187-200 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Chilese Erica & Russo Antonio Paolo, 2009. "Urban fashion policies: lessons from the Barcelona catwalks," EBLA Working Papers 200803, University of Turin.
    4. Joaquim Rius Ulldemolins, 2014. "Culture and authenticity in urban regeneration processes: Place branding in central Barcelona," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(14), pages 3026-3045, November.
    5. Jan van der Borg & Antonio Russo, 2008. "Area Regeneration and Tourism Development. Evidence from Three European Cities," Working Papers 2008_21, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    6. Antònia Casellas & Montserrat Pallares-Barbera, 2009. "Public-sector Intervention in Embodying the New Economy in Inner Urban Areas: The Barcelona Experience," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(5-6), pages 1137-1155, May.
    7. Roberto Cellini & Tiziana Cuccia & Domenico Lisi, 2020. "Spatial dependence in museum services: an analysis of the Italian case," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(4), pages 535-562, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public space; play; social practices; ethnography; London (UK);
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:64162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.