IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/52160.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Urbanizing refuge: interrogating spaces of displacement

Author

Listed:
  • Sanyal, Romola

Abstract

Refugee spaces are emerging as quintessential geographies of the modern, yet their intimate and everyday spatialities remain under-explored. Rendered largely through geopolitical discourses, they are seen as biopolitical spaces where the sovereign can reduce the subject to bare life. In conceptualizing refugee spaces some scholars have argued that, although many camps grow and develop over time, they evolve their own unique form of urbanism that is still un-urban. This article challenges this idea of the camp as space of pure biopolitics and explores the politics of space in the refugee camp using urban debates. Using case studies from the Middle East and South Asia, it looks at how the refugee spaces developed and became informalized, and how people recovered their agency through ‘producing spaces’ both physically and politically. In doing so, it draws connections between refugee camps and other spaces of urban marginality, and suggests that refugee spaces can be seen as important sites for articulating new politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanyal, Romola, 2014. "Urbanizing refuge: interrogating spaces of displacement," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 52160, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:52160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/52160/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hannah Sender, 2022. "Young people’s perspectives of inequitable urban change in Lebanese towns affected by mass displacement," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 293-306, April.
    2. Kazi Nazrul Fattah & Peter Walters, 2020. "“A Good Place for the Poor!” Counternarratives to Territorial Stigmatisation from Two Informal Settlements in Dhaka," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 55-65.
    3. Nichola Khan, 2020. "Sindh in Karachi: A topography of separateness, connectivity, and juxtaposition," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(5), pages 938-957, August.
    4. Ayham Dalal & Amer Darweesh & Philipp Misselwitz & Anna Steigemann, 2018. "Planning the Ideal Refugee Camp? A Critical Interrogation of Recent Planning Innovations in Jordan and Germany," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(4), pages 64-78.
    5. Jutta Bakonyi, 2021. "The Political Economy of Displacement: Rent Seeking, Dispossessions and Precarious Mobility in Somali Cities," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S2), pages 10-22, April.
    6. Amin Y Kamete, 2020. "Neither friend nor enemy: Planning, ambivalence and the invalidation of urban informality in Zimbabwe," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(5), pages 927-943, April.
    7. Thomas Swerts, 2017. "Creating Space For Citizenship: The Liminal Politics of Undocumented Activism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 379-395, May.
    8. Lucas Oesch, 2020. "An Improvised Dispositif: Invisible Urban Planning in the Refugee Camp," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 349-365, March.
    9. Kabakova, Oksana & Plaksenkov, Evgeny, 2018. "Analysis of factors affecting financial inclusion: Ecosystem view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 198-205.
    10. Abdon Dantas & David Banh & Philip Heywood & Miguel Amado, 2021. "Decoding Emergency Settlement through Quantitative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    refugee; urban; informality; exception; agency; Lebanon; Middle East; India; South Asia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:52160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.