IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/126614.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Hypergamy reconsidered: marriage in England, 1837-2021

Author

Listed:
  • Clark, Gregory
  • Cummins, Neil

Abstract

It is widely believed that women value social status in marital partners more than men, leading to female marital hypergamy (“marrying up”), and more female intergenerational social mobility. Using evidence from more than 33 million marriages and 67 million births in England 1837-2021 we show that within this era there was never significant hypergamous marriage by women. The average status of women’s fathers equaled that of their husbands’ fathers. For marriages 1912- 2007 the average social status of female surnames equaled that of male. This was true also for parent surnames of children. Consistent with this, there was no differential tendency in England of men and women to marry by family status. There is also ancillary evidence that physical attraction cannot have been the significant determinant of matching in marriages in any period 1837-2021, based on the very strong correlation observed in underlying social status for marital partners throughout these years.

Suggested Citation

  • Clark, Gregory & Cummins, Neil, 2025. "Hypergamy reconsidered: marriage in England, 1837-2021," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126614, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:126614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126614/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cummins, Neil, 2021. "Where Is the Middle Class? Evidence from 60 Million English Death and Probate Records, 1892–1992," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 81(2), pages 359-404, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rahal, Charles & Verhagen, Mark D. & Kirk, David, 2021. "The Rise of Machine Learning in the Academic Social Sciences," SocArXiv gydve_v1, Center for Open Science.
    2. Andrew Seltzer & Martin Shanahan & Claire Wright, 2022. "The Rise and Fall and Rise (?) of Economic History in Australia," CEH Discussion Papers 05, Centre for Economic History, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
    3. Simson, Rebecca & Mahmoudzadeh, Mina, 2024. "Inherited wealth in post-apartheid South Africa: new perspectives from probate records," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 125939, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Cummins, Neil, 2024. "Ethnic wealth inequality in England and Wales, 1858–2018," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Neil Cummins, 2022. "The hidden wealth of English dynasties, 1892–2016," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 75(3), pages 667-702, August.
    6. Castañeda Garza, Diego, 2024. "Moderate opulence: the evolution of wealth inequality in Mexico in its first century of independence," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Leander Heldring & James A. Robinson & Parker Whitfill, 2022. "The Second World War, Inequality and the Social Contract in Britain," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(S1), pages 137-159, June.
    8. Daniel Waldenström, 2021. "Wealth and History: An Update," CESifo Working Paper Series 9366, CESifo.
    9. Jäger, Philipp, 2023. "Can pensions save lives? Evidence from the introduction of old-age assistance in the UK," Ruhr Economic Papers 995, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    10. Waldenström, Daniel, 2021. "Wealth and History: An Update," Working Paper Series 1411, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N33 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy - - - Europe: Pre-1913
    • N34 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy - - - Europe: 1913-

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:126614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.