IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/126540.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Challenging inequality: rights of the waste workers of Delhi

Author

Listed:
  • Pal, Ankush
  • Kashyap, Anubhav

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic did not create any new problems for the working class in India but amplified those that have been prevalent for ages due to an economic system that prioritises profit. Particularly, the collecting and disposing of garbage in the Indian subcontinent has always been associated with a particular caste group, ranked low in the caste hierarchy of the Hindu social order. Though this system can be traced back to Hindu religious texts, it has long percolated into practice in other faiths, with people who converted from these communities. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the waste collectors living in informal settlements on the peripheries of New Delhi faced a peculiar exclusion from basic infrastructural amenities and the right to work. The parlance of social distancing provided an environment adverse to the manual door-to-door waste collection in which the workers were engaged. As a substitute, the state machinery employed private companies whose modus operandi is not very different from independent waste workers. However, when things were restored to normalcy, the workers continued to find themselves out of work. The Solid Waste Management Act 2016 recognises the rights of waste workers, but they are yet to be enforced. In this paper, we look at the exclusion of the waste workers from accessing the city who, by their profession, are seen as polluting the very city which they keep clean.

Suggested Citation

  • Pal, Ankush & Kashyap, Anubhav, 2025. "Challenging inequality: rights of the waste workers of Delhi," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126540, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:126540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126540/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    exclusion; informalisation; reduced mobility; social justice; urbanisation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:126540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.