IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/124203.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The EU's twin transitions towards sustainability and digital leadership: a coherent or fragmented policy field?

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Xinchuchu

Abstract

In order to achieve the goal of climate neutrality, while also enhancing Europe’s industrial competitiveness on the global stage, the acceleration of the twin – green and digital – transitions has been among the top priorities for the European Union (EU). Given the multiplicity of policy areas involved in these twin transitions as well as the nature of the EU as a multilevel organisation, coherence is the key requirement for the twin transitions to be successful. Drawing on the concept of coherence, this article explores whether the EU can be considered a coherent actor when pursuing the twin transitions. It understands coherence as a process to reduce contradictions across different policy domains rather than as a status where no contradictions exist. It also challenges previous views centred solely on coherence during policy implementation, and proposes a broader assessment that begins by framing different policy domains as mutually beneficial and aligned towards common goals. This perspective introduces two dimensions of coherence – conceptual and operational – along horizontal and vertical levels. By examining how policies are framed and interconnected across different levels of governance and policy agendas, this study reveals that while the link between the green and digital transitions and the need for coordination across different governance levels has been widely accepted, conceptual coherence varies across governance levels and policy areas. Furthermore, the study argues that operational coherence – putting ideas into practice – lags behind conceptual coherence, which highlights the challenges of implementing the twin transitions effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Xinchuchu, 2024. "The EU's twin transitions towards sustainability and digital leadership: a coherent or fragmented policy field?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124203, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:124203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/124203/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jordan, Grant & Halpin, Darren, 2006. "The Political Costs of Policy Coherence: Constructing a Rural Policy for Scotland," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 21-41, May.
    2. Helena Carrapico & André Barrinha, 2017. "The EU as a Coherent (Cyber)Security Actor?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(6), pages 1254-1272, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bill Slee, 2024. "Collaborative Action, Policy Support and Rural Sustainability Transitions in Advanced Western Economies: The Case of Scotland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Chaya, Wirawat & Jesdapipat, Sitanon & Tripetchkul, Sudarut & Santitaweeroek, Yuwanan & Gheewala, Shabbir H., 2019. "Challenges and pitfalls in implementing Thailand's ethanol plan: Integrated policy coherence and gap analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1050-1063.
    3. Guillermo M. Cejudo & Cynthia L. Michel, 2017. "Addressing fragmented government action: coordination, coherence, and integration," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(4), pages 745-767, December.
    4. Makkonen, Marika & Huttunen, Suvi & Primmer, Eeva & Repo, Anna & Hildén, Mikael, 2015. "Policy coherence in climate change mitigation: An ecosystem service approach to forests as carbon sinks and bioenergy sources," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 153-162.
    5. Julius T. Mugwagwa, 2013. "Revealing the footprint: Supranational organizations and transnational governance of biotechnology in southern Africa," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(1), pages 135-148, March.
    6. Duncan Russel & Andrew Jordan, 2009. "Joining up or Pulling Apart? The Use of Appraisal to Coordinate Policy Making for Sustainable Development," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(5), pages 1201-1216, May.
    7. Ralf Nordbeck & Reinhard Steurer, 2016. "Multi-sectoral strategies as dead ends of policy integration: Lessons to be learned from sustainable development," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(4), pages 737-755, June.
    8. Jeroen J. L. Candel & Robbert Biesbroek, 2018. "Policy integration in the EU governance of global food security," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(1), pages 195-209, February.
    9. Duncan Russel & John Turnpenny, 2009. "The Politics of Sustainable Development in UK Government: What Role for Integrated Policy Appraisal?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 27(2), pages 340-354, April.
    10. Azad Bali & Darren Halpin, 2021. "Agenda-setting instruments: means and strategies for the management of policy demands [Mayflies and old bulls: Organization persistence in state interest communities]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(3), pages 333-344.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European Union; climate neutrality; green and digital twin transitions; digitalisation; coherence;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • N40 - Economic History - - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation - - - General, International, or Comparative
    • N43 - Economic History - - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation - - - Europe: Pre-1913

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:124203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.