IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/123909.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Benefits of population-level interventions for dementia risk factors: an economic modelling study for England

Author

Listed:
  • Mukadam, Naaheed
  • Anderson, Robert
  • Walsh, Sebastian
  • Wittenberg, Raphael
  • Knapp, Martin
  • Brayne, Carol

Abstract

Background Individual-level interventions for dementia risk factors could reduce costs associated with dementia and some are cost-effective. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of population-level interventions for tackling dementia risk factors. Methods In this economic modelling study, we included recommended population-based interventions from a previously published review article for which there was consistent and robust evidence of effectiveness in tackling a dementia risk factor (tobacco smoking, excess alcohol use, hypertension, obesity, air pollution, and head injury). We only included interventions if they had not been introduced in England or were in place but could be extended. The interventions studied were increases in tobacco pricing, minimum pricing for alcohol, raising alcohol price, salt reduction policies, sugar reduction policies, low emission zones, and compulsory helmet use for cycling by children (aged 5–18 years). We used published intervention effect sizes and relative risks for each risk factor and a Markov model to estimate progression to dementia in populations with and without the intervention, looking at lifetime risk, in the population of England. Findings We estimated that reductions in excess alcohol use through minimum unit pricing would lead to cost-savings of £280 million and 4767 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained over an indefinite succession of age cohorts. Reformulation of food products to reduce salt would lead to cost-savings of £2·4 billion and 39 433 QALYs gained and reformulation to reduce sugar would lead to cost-savings of £1·046 billion and 17 985 QALYs gained. Reducing dementia risk from air pollution by introducing low emission zones in English cities with a population of 100 000 or more (that do not already impose restrictions) would lead to £260 million cost-savings and 5119 QALYs gained. Raising cigarette prices by 10% to reduce dementia risk from smoking would lead to 2277 QALYs gained and cost-savings of £157 million. Making bicycle helmets compulsory for children (aged 5–18 years) to reduce dementia risk from head injury would lead to cost-savings of £91 million and 1554 QALYs gained. Interpretation Population-level interventions could help tackle life course dementia risk and save costs. Funding UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Three Schools dementia research programme.

Suggested Citation

  • Mukadam, Naaheed & Anderson, Robert & Walsh, Sebastian & Wittenberg, Raphael & Knapp, Martin & Brayne, Carol, 2024. "Benefits of population-level interventions for dementia risk factors: an economic modelling study for England," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123909, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:123909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/123909/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clare Beeston & Mark Robinson & Lucie Giles & Elinor Dickie & Jane Ford & Megan MacPherson & Rachel McAdams & Ruth Mellor & Deborah Shipton & Neil Craig, 2020. "Evaluation of Minimum Unit Pricing of Alcohol: A Mixed Method Natural Experiment in Scotland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles D. H. Parry & Niamh Fitzgerald, 2020. "Special Issue: Alcohol Policy and Public Health—Contributing to the Global Debate on Accelerating Action on Alcohol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-7, May.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:123909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.