IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/123564.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Shape-shifters, chameleons, and recognitional politics: the asset management industry and financial regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Macartney, Huw
  • Pape, Fabian
  • Watson, Matthew

Abstract

The asset management industry is becoming a systemic feature of global finance, yet has evaded regulators’ efforts to designate its largest firms as systemically important institutions. How has this been achieved? We use as our example BlackRock’s running commentary on the evolving plans of both prudential (banking) and securities (market) regulators in the period from 2008 to 2018. We show how asset managers engaged in successful recognitional politics, based on a decade-long struggle to influence how they were seen across the regulatory divide. James C. Scott’s most recent thoughts on legibility codes provide us with our conceptual language of shape-shifters and chameleons. Two distinct strategies were simultaneously in play. As a shape-shifter, BlackRock repeatedly changed form in its self-presentation to prudential regulators concerned with systemic risk, so they could not be certain what they were looking at. As a chameleon, it invited securities regulators to maintain their authority over the asset management industry, so it could increasingly blend into the supposedly safe category of market-based finance.

Suggested Citation

  • Macartney, Huw & Pape, Fabian & Watson, Matthew, 2024. "Shape-shifters, chameleons, and recognitional politics: the asset management industry and financial regulation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123564, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:123564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/123564/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ernesto Dal Bo´, 2006. "Regulatory Capture: A Review," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 22(2), pages 203-225, Summer.
    2. repec:imf:imfdep:2021/018 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Manuela Moschella, 2012. "Seeing Like the IMF on Capital Account Liberalisation," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 59-76.
    4. repec:imf:imfdps:2021/018 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Macartney, Huw & Howarth, David & James, Scott, 2020. "Bank power and public policy since the financial crisis," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Scott James & Lucia Quaglia, 2023. "Epistemic contestation and interagency conflict: The challenge of regulating investment funds," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 346-362, April.
    7. Antje Vetterlein, 2012. "Seeing Like the World Bank on Poverty," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 35-58.
    8. Andrew Baker, 2013. "The New Political Economy of the Macroprudential Ideational Shift," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 112-139, February.
    9. Adrian, Tobias & Shin, Hyun Song, 2010. "Liquidity and leverage," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 418-437, July.
    10. Babic, Milan & Huijzer, Jouke & Garcia-Bernardo, Javier & Valeeva, Diliara, 2022. "How does business power operate? A framework for its working mechanisms," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 133-150, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cole, John A. & Cadogan, Godfrey, 2014. "Bankruptcy risk induced by career concerns of regulators," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 259-271.
    2. Steininger, Lea & Hesse, Casimir, 2024. "Buying into new ideas: The ECB’s evolving justification of unlimited liquidity," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 357, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    3. Tobias Adrian & Nina Boyarchenko, 2013. "Intermediary balance sheets," Staff Reports 651, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    4. Chen, Sichong, 2013. "How do leverage ratios affect bank share performance during financial crises: The Japanese experience of the late 1990s," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-18.
    5. Guarin, Alexander & Lozano, Ignacio, 2017. "Credit funding and banking fragility: A forecasting model for emerging economies," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 168-189.
    6. Fritz Breuss, 2016. "The Crisis Management of the ECB," WIFO Working Papers 507, WIFO.
    7. Molestina Vivar, Luis & Wedow, Michael & Weistroffer, Christian, 2023. "Burned by leverage? Flows and fragility in bond mutual funds," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 354-380.
    8. Raffestin, Louis, 2014. "Diversification and systemic risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 85-106.
    9. Luca Riccetti & Alberto Russo & Mauro Gallegati, 2015. "An agent based decentralized matching macroeconomic model," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 10(2), pages 305-332, October.
    10. Jeanne, Olivier & Korinek, Anton, 2019. "Managing credit booms and busts: A Pigouvian taxation approach," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 2-17.
    11. Valentina Bruno & Hyun Song Shin, 2014. "Assessing Macroprudential Policies: Case of South Korea," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 116(1), pages 128-157, January.
    12. Anderson, Robert M. & Bianchi, Stephen W. & Goldberg, Lisa R., 2013. "The Decision to Lever," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt8cg116sv, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    13. Nicole Boyson & Jean Helwege & Jan Jindra, 2014. "Crises, Liquidity Shocks, and Fire Sales at Commercial Banks," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 43(4), pages 857-884, December.
    14. Roland Meeks & Benjamin Nelson & Piergiorgio Alessandri, 2017. "Shadow Banks and Macroeconomic Instability," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(7), pages 1483-1516, October.
    15. Carlos Arteta & M. Ayhan Kose & Franziska Ohnsorge & Marc Stocke, 2015. "The Coming U.S. Interest Rate Tightening Cycle: Smooth Sailing or Stormy Waters?," Koç University-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum Working Papers 1522, Koc University-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum.
    16. Tobias Adrian & Hyun Song Shin, 2008. "Financial intermediaries, financial stability and monetary policy," Proceedings - Economic Policy Symposium - Jackson Hole, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pages 287-334.
    17. Janda, Karel & Kravtsov, Oleg, 2016. "Interdependencies between Leverage and Capital Ratios in the Central and Eastern European Banks," MPRA Paper 74560, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Roland Füss & Daniel Ruf, 2018. "Office Market Interconnectedness and Systemic Risk Exposure," Working Papers on Finance 1830, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance.
    19. Greenwood, Robin & Landier, Augustin & Thesmar, David, 2015. "Vulnerable banks," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(3), pages 471-485.
    20. Carlos A. Arango & Oscar M. Valencia, 2015. "Macro-Prudential Policy under Moral Hazard and Financial Fragility," Borradores de Economia 878, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    asset management industry; BlackRock; recognitional politics; prudential regulation; securities regulation; James C. Scott;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • F3 - International Economics - - International Finance
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:123564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.