IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/121502.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cost-benefit analysis of extending support to domestic abuse victims with NRPF: a technical report for the Domestic Abuse Commissioner

Author

Listed:
  • Scanlon Bradley, Kathleen Juanita
  • Provan, James Albert
  • Ivandic, Ria
  • Fernández-Reino, Mariña
  • Blanc, Fanny Sarah Jeanne
  • Whitehead, Christine Margaret Elizabeth

Abstract

This report provides the technical underpinning to the report by the Domestic Abuse Commissioner’s Report1 laid before Parliament in December 2022. That report was in response to the Home Office request that she set out ‘the gaps in evidence available to the Home Office on support for Migrant Victims of Domestic Abuse, by establishing the number of victims and survivors of domestic abuse who have no recourse to public funds, the cost of supporting those who need support, and the cost benefit of such interventions.2’ LSE was asked by the Commissioner to provide a detailed technical analysis to underpin her response. This LSE report provides our views on relevant evidence but no policy recommendations. Such recommendations are made in the Commissioner’s report, having considered our evidence alongside the evidence of other stakeholders and people she has consulted. Our analysis required us to make strong assumptions, and there is significant uncertainty around many of them. There is considerable uncertainty in published validated statistics about the numbers of migrants in the UK with each visa status, and even more uncertainty about numbers of undocumented migrants and of ‘visitors’. There is also uncertainty about how many of these migrants currently experience domestic abuse, and an added and independent uncertainty about the proportion of those people who would present at services. We have also had to make various assumptions which affect the costs and benefits. We address and mitigate these and other uncertainties through our sensitivity analysis and additional modelling in this report. In addition, an accompanying Excel workbook sets out in detail our assumptions and how they underpin our conclusions, which allows for further sensitivity analysis and modelling to be done.

Suggested Citation

  • Scanlon Bradley, Kathleen Juanita & Provan, James Albert & Ivandic, Ria & Fernández-Reino, Mariña & Blanc, Fanny Sarah Jeanne & Whitehead, Christine Margaret Elizabeth, 2022. "Cost-benefit analysis of extending support to domestic abuse victims with NRPF: a technical report for the Domestic Abuse Commissioner," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121502, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:121502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/121502/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kerris Cooper & Kitty Stewart, 2021. "Does Household Income Affect children’s Outcomes? A Systematic Review of the Evidence," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(3), pages 981-1005, June.
    2. Ellie Benton & Jacob Karlsson & Ilona Pinter & Bert Provan & Kath Scanlon & Christine Whitehead, 2022. "Social Cost Benefit Analysis of the no recourse to public funds (NRPF) policy in London," CASE Reports casereport140, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana I. Moro Egido & Maria Navarro, 2023. "Intergenerational Transmission of Economic Strain and High School Dropout," ThE Papers 23/07, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    2. Monique De Haan & Magnus Stubhaug, 2024. "The Causal Component in the Intergenerational Transmission of Income," CESifo Working Paper Series 11395, CESifo.
    3. Tammy Campbell & Polina Obolenskaya, 2021. "No such thing as a free lunch? Exploring the consistency, validity, and uses of the ‘Free School Meals’ (FSM) measure in the National Pupil Database," CASE Papers /225, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    4. Stefani Milovanska-Farrington, 2022. "The effect of child benefits on financial difficulties and spending habits: evidence from Poland’s Family 500 + program," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 719-739, October.
    5. Datzberger, Simone & Parkes, Jenny & Bhatia, Amiya & Nagawa, Rehema & Kasidi, Joan Ritar & Musenze, Brian Junior & Devries, Karen, 2024. "Young people’s experiences of informal kinship care in Luwero, Uganda," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. Andersen, Kate & Redman, Jamie & Stewart, Kitty & Patrick, Ruth, 2025. "It's the kids that suffer’: exploring how the UK's benefit cap and two-child limit harm children," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123570, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Guo, Liwen & Cheng, Zhiming & Tani, Massimiliano & Cook, Sarah, 2024. "Air pollution and education investment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    8. Xavier Bartoll-Roca & Gemma Serral Cano & Mònica Cortés Albaladejo & Katherine Pérez, 2024. "Household Economic Hardship and Child Mental Health: The Mediating Role of Parents’ Mental Distress in a Southern European City," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 89-107, October.
    9. Braxton, John Carter & Chikhale, Nisha & Herkenhoff, Kyle & Phillips, Gordon, 2024. "Intergenerational Mobility and Credit," IZA Discussion Papers 16826, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. González, Libertad & Trommlerová, Sofia, 2022. "Cash transfers before pregnancy and infant health," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    11. Stian Overå & Anders Bakken & Christer Hyggen, 2024. "Prevalence and Characteristics of Female and Male Esports Players among Norwegian Youth: A General Population Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Samuel C. M. Faulconer & M. Rachél Hveem & Mikaela J. Dufur, 2022. "Gendered Associations between Single Parenthood and Child Behavior Problems in the United Kingdom," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Klara Gurzo & Bitte Modin & Pekka Martikainen & Olof Östergren, 2022. "Pathways from Childhood Economic Conditions to Adult Mortality in a 1953 Stockholm Cohort: The Intermediate Role of Personal Attributes and Socioeconomic Career," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Mari, Gabriele, 2023. "Less for more? Cuts to child benefits, family adjustments, and long-run child outcomes in larger families," SocArXiv e3n82, Center for Open Science.
    15. Treanor, Morag & Troncoso, Patricio, 2022. "Poverty, parental work intensity and child emotional and conduct problems," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    16. Campbell, Tammy & Obolenskaya, Polina, 2021. "No such thing as a free lunch? Exploring the consistency, validity, and uses of the 'Free School Meals' (FSM) measure in the National Pupil Database," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121531, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Mari, Gabriele & Keizer, Renske, 2021. "Do high-income households 'label' family cash transfers? Evidence on family expenditures from Australia," SocArXiv ucyzb, Center for Open Science.
    18. Oliver Cassagneau-Francis & Dominic Kelly, 2022. "The potential effects of the cost of living crisis on children's outcomes," CEPEO Briefing Note Series 17, UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities, revised Dec 2022.
    19. Goldfeld, Sharon & Downes, Marnie & Gray, Sarah & Pham, Cindy & Guo, Shuaijun & O'Connor, Elodie & Redmond, Gerry & Azpitarte, Francisco & Badland, Hannah & Woolfenden, Sue & Williams, Katrina & Pries, 2024. "Household income supplements in early childhood to reduce inequities in children's development," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    20. Hema Shah & Lisa A. Gennetian, 2024. "Unconditional cash transfers for families with children in the U.S.: a scoping review," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 415-450, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    case; domestic; abuse; violence; NRPF; commission;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • N0 - Economic History - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:121502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.