IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/115623.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The green climate fund and its shortcomings in local delivery of adaptation finance

Author

Listed:
  • Omukuti, Jessica
  • Barrett, Sam
  • White, Piran C.L.
  • Marchant, Robert
  • Averchenkova, Alina

Abstract

The Paris Agreement recognizes the important role that local level actors play in ensuring climate change adaptation that contributes to meeting the global temperature goal. As a financial mechanism of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the largest dedicated climate fund, the Green Climate Fund (GCF) is critical to achieving this goal. How GCF allocates its resources is therefore a critical area of research. This article assesses GCF’s commitment to the local delivery of adaptation finance and identifies the key barriers to GCF’s achievement of this commitment. The analysis finds that although GCF’s policies and communications fully commit to funding local level adaptation, three key barriers still prevent it from delivering finance to the local level. First, GCF lacks a unified framework for identifying and defining the local level, local actors, and local adaptation processes. Second, GCF exhibits limited transparency and accountability in relation to how approved funding for adaptation is spent, particularly for projects that claim to generate local level adaptation outcomes. Third, some Accredited Entities have limited experience and capacity for designing and implementing projects that deliver finance to the local level. This is because the local delivery of finance is not prioritized by GCF during the accreditation of entities or provision of readiness support to Accredited Entities. Our findings indicate limited evidence of GCF’s full operationalization of its commitment to supporting local adaptation. We recommend that GCF develop and apply a unified framework for defining what constitutes ‘local’. Key policy insights GCF is committed to supporting local adaptation finance in developing countries but has failed to adequately operationalize this commitment. To increase local delivery of climate finance, GCF should develop a unified framework for local delivery of adapation finance that emphasises local actors' leadership in design, implementation, and management of adaptation projects. GCF should also increase transparency and accountability of funded projects to enable independent assessments of local delivery of adaptation finance by making project information, including financial reports publicly available. GCF should ensure that Accredited Entities have capacity to develop and deliver projects that deliver adaptation finance to the local level e.g. by requiring entities to provide evidence of support for local adaptation during accreditation.

Suggested Citation

  • Omukuti, Jessica & Barrett, Sam & White, Piran C.L. & Marchant, Robert & Averchenkova, Alina, 2022. "The green climate fund and its shortcomings in local delivery of adaptation finance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115623, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:115623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/115623/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan van der Ploeg & Meshach Sukulu & Hugh Govan & Tessa Minter & Hampus Eriksson, 2020. "Sinking Islands, Drowned Logic; Climate Change and Community-Based Adaptation Discourses in Solomon Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Sanjay Kumar, 2015. "Green Climate Fund faces slew of criticism," Nature, Nature, vol. 527(7579), pages 419-420, November.
    3. William M. Fonta & Elias T. Ayuk & Tiff van Huysen, 2018. "Africa and the Green Climate Fund: current challenges and future opportunities," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(9), pages 1210-1225, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Philips, Abiodun S., 2023. "Institutional enforcement of environmental fiscal stance and energy stock markets performance: Evaluating for returns and risk among connected markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nadia Basty & Dorsaf Azouz Ghachem, 2022. "A Sectoral Approach of Adaptation Finance in Developing Countries: Does Climate Justice Apply?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Raissa Sorgho & Carlos A. Montenegro Quiñonez & Valérie R. Louis & Volker Winkler & Peter Dambach & Rainer Sauerborn & Olaf Horstick, 2020. "Climate Change Policies in 16 West African Countries: A Systematic Review of Adaptation with a Focus on Agriculture, Food Security, and Nutrition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Luis H. Zamarioli & Pieter Pauw & Christine Grüning, 2020. "Country Ownership as the Means for Paradigm Shift: The Case of the Green Climate Fund," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Gergely Buda & Judit Ricz, 2023. "Industrial symbiosis and industrial policy for sustainable development in Uganda," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 165-189, April.
    5. Janne von Seggern, 2020. "Understandings, Practices and Human-Environment Relationships—A Meta-Ethnographic Analysis of Local and Indigenous Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies in Selected Pacific Island States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. van der Ploeg, J. & Jupiter, S. & Hughes, A. & Eriksson, H. & Boso, D. & Govan, H., 2020. "Coral reef conservation in Solomon Islands: Overcoming the policy implementation gap," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 40902, April.
    7. Kung, Chih-Chun & Lan, Xiaolong & Yang, Yunxia & Kung, Shan-Shan & Chang, Meng-Shiuh, 2022. "Effects of green bonds on Taiwan's bioenergy development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    8. Omukuti, Jessica, 2020. "Challenging the obsession with local level institutions in country ownership of climate change adaptation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    9. Daniele Conversi, 2021. "Exemplary Ethical Communities. A New Concept for a Livable Anthropocene," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Johnella Bradshaw & Simron Jit Singh & Su-Yin Tan & Tomer Fishman & Kristen Pott, 2020. "GIS-Based Material Stock Analysis (MSA) of Climate Vulnerabilities to the Tourism Industry in Antigua and Barbuda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Kennedy Ndue & Goda Pál, 2022. "European Green Transition Implications on Africa’s Livestock Sector Development and Resilience to Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-29, November.
    12. Meng Xu & Zhongfeng Qin & Yigang Wei, 2023. "Exploring the financing and allocating schemes for the Chinese Green Climate Fund," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2487-2508, March.
    13. Moner-Girona, M. & Bender, A. & Becker, W. & Bódis, K. & Szabó, S. & Kararach, A.G. & Anadon, L.D., 2021. "A multidimensional high-resolution assessment approach to boost decentralised energy investments in Sub-Saharan Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    14. Isaac Doku & Andrew Phiri, 2022. "Climate finance and hunger among non-annex-1 parties: a lens on Sub-Saharan Africa," International Journal of Sustainable Economy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(4), pages 380-398.
    15. Kornek, Ulrike & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2020. "The strategic dimension of financing global public goods," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    16. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Szymon Czyża, 2023. "Socio-Economic Vulnerability to Climate Change in Rural Areas in the Context of Green Energy Development—A Study of the Great Masurian Lakes Mesoregion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-24, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    climate change adaptation; climate finance; local delivery; locally-led adaptation; transparency and accountability; UNFCCC;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:115623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.