IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i14p5714-d385181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Country Ownership as the Means for Paradigm Shift: The Case of the Green Climate Fund

Author

Listed:
  • Luis H. Zamarioli

    (Frankfurt School-UNEP Collaborating Centre on Climate Finance, 60322 Frankfurt, Germany)

  • Pieter Pauw

    (Frankfurt School-UNEP Collaborating Centre on Climate Finance, 60322 Frankfurt, Germany
    Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, 3584 Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Stockholm Environment Institute, 11523 Stockholm, Sweden
    German Development Institute, 53113 Bonn, Germany)

  • Christine Grüning

    (Frankfurt School-UNEP Collaborating Centre on Climate Finance, 60322 Frankfurt, Germany)

Abstract

Country ownership echoes from the aid effectiveness agenda in climate finance, becoming a means to ensure that (1) projects are aligned with national climate policies and strategies, (2) national systems are used to increase recipients’ accountability in the use of resources, and (3) national public and private stakeholders are engaged in the process. The concept is a key objective of the Green Climate Fund (GCF), considered in light of the GCF’s goal of promoting the paradigm shift towards low emission and climate-resilient development. In the interplay between international commitments and the progress of its in-country activities, the GCF relies on the agency of National Designated Authorities (NDAs). Based on documental sources, GCF data, and a survey, this article first analyzes whether the GCF’s institutional design creates appropriate responsibilities so NDAs can effectively enhance country ownership. As a second level of effectiveness, the article analyzes whether such an institutional design is currently capable of promoting the desired paradigm shift. In the context of the GCF being a young fund, we found that NDAs have the potential to enhance country ownership, but need more tailored capacity building to ensure that in-country activities are effectively equipped to deliver the paradigm shift.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis H. Zamarioli & Pieter Pauw & Christine Grüning, 2020. "Country Ownership as the Means for Paradigm Shift: The Case of the Green Climate Fund," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:14:p:5714-:d:385181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5714/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5714/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heike Schroeder, 2010. "Agency in international climate negotiations: the case of indigenous peoples and avoided deforestation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 317-332, December.
    2. William M. Fonta & Elias T. Ayuk & Tiff van Huysen, 2018. "Africa and the Green Climate Fund: current challenges and future opportunities," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(9), pages 1210-1225, October.
    3. Frank Biermann & Michele Betsill & Joyeeta Gupta & Norichika Kanie & Louis Lebel & Diana Liverman & Heike Schroeder & Bernd Siebenhüner & Ruben Zondervan, 2010. "Earth system governance: a research framework," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 277-298, December.
    4. W. Pauw & R. Klein & P. Vellinga & F. Biermann, 2016. "Private finance for adaptation: do private realities meet public ambitions?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 489-503, February.
    5. Jung , Jione & Song, Jihei, 2015. "Green Climate Fund, Pursuing Country Ownership," World Economy Brief 15-1, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
    6. Rainer Göb & Christopher McCollin & Maria Ramalhoto, 2007. "Ordinal Methodology in the Analysis of Likert Scales," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(5), pages 601-626, October.
    7. Lianbiao Cui & Yi Sun & Malin Song & Lei Zhu, 2020. "Co-financing in the green climate fund: lessons from the global environment facility," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 95-108, January.
    8. W. P. Pauw & R. J. T. Klein & P. Vellinga & F. Biermann, 2016. "Private finance for adaptation: do private realities meet public ambitions?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 489-503, February.
    9. Peterson, Lauri & Skovgaard, Jakob, 2019. "Bureaucratic politics and the allocation of climate finance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 72-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas Kalinowski, 2020. "Institutional Innovations and Their Challenges in the Green Climate Fund: Country Ownership, Civil Society Participation and Private Sector Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Sheng Hu & Pan Zhang & Taoyuan Wei, 2022. "Financial Measures to Reduce Carbon Emissions in Britain, Japan and the United States: A SWOT Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-18, August.
    3. P. P. Stoll & W. P. Pauw & F. Tohme & C. Grüning, 2021. "Mobilizing private adaptation finance: lessons learned from the Green Climate Fund," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesse M. Keenan & Anurag Gumber, 2019. "California climate adaptation trust fund: exploring the leveraging of cap-and-trade proceeds," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 454-465, December.
    2. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Smith, Tom & McKnight, Brent, 2016. "Environmental finance: A research agenda for interdisciplinary finance research," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 124-130.
    3. Jesse M. Keenan, 2018. "Regional resilience trust funds: an exploratory analysis for leveraging insurance surcharges," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 118-139, March.
    4. Frank Biermann & Ruben Zondervan, 2010. "Editorial," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 273-276, December.
    5. Sander Chan & Wanja Amling, 2019. "Does orchestration in the Global Climate Action Agenda effectively prioritize and mobilize transnational climate adaptation action?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 429-446, October.
    6. P. P. Stoll & W. P. Pauw & F. Tohme & C. Grüning, 2021. "Mobilizing private adaptation finance: lessons learned from the Green Climate Fund," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Weinlich, Silke & Baumann, Max-Otto & Lundsgaarde, Erik & Wolff, Peter, 2020. "Earmarking in the multilateral development system: Many shades of grey," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 101, number 101, July.
    8. Jonathan Pickering & Carola Betzold & Jakob Skovgaard, 2017. "Special issue: managing fragmentation and complexity in the emerging system of international climate finance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Bhatnagar, S. & Sharma, D., 2022. "Evolution of green finance and its enablers: A bibliometric analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    10. Michelle Scobie, 2021. "Treaty Preambles and The Environmental Justice Gap," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(3), pages 273-285, May.
    11. Carè, R. & Weber, O., 2023. "How much finance is in climate finance? A bibliometric review, critiques, and future research directions," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Jale Samuwai & Jeremy Maxwell Hills, 2018. "Assessing Climate Finance Readiness in the Asia-Pacific Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Nadia Basty & Dorsaf Azouz Ghachem, 2022. "A Sectoral Approach of Adaptation Finance in Developing Countries: Does Climate Justice Apply?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    14. Daniel Kouloukoui & Sônia Maria da Silva Gomes & Marcia Mara de Oliveira Marinho & Ednildo Andrade Torres & Asher Kiperstok & Pieter de Jong, 2018. "Disclosure of climate risk information by the world’s largest companies," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 1251-1279, December.
    15. Ivan Diaz-Rainey & Becky Robertson & Charlie Wilson, 2017. "Stranded research? Leading finance journals are silent on climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 243-260, July.
    16. Nnamdi Ifeanyi Maduekwe & Francis A. Adesina, 2022. "Can remittances contribute to financing climate actions in developing countries? Evidence from analyses of households’ climate hazard exposure and adaptation actors in SE Nigeria," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 1-22, January.
    17. Naghmeh Nasiritousi & Mattias Hjerpe & Björn-Ola Linnér, 2016. "The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: understanding agency through governance profiles," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 109-126, February.
    18. Kathrin Dombrowski, 2010. "Filling the gap? An analysis of non-governmental organizations responses to participation and representation deficits in global climate governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 397-416, December.
    19. Peterson, Lauri & Skovgaard, Jakob, 2019. "Bureaucratic politics and the allocation of climate finance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 72-97.
    20. Joanes Odiwuor Atela & Claire Hellen Quinn & Albert A. Arhin & Lalisa Duguma & Kennedy Liti Mbeva, 2017. "Exploring the agency of Africa in climate change negotiations: the case of REDD+," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 463-482, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:14:p:5714-:d:385181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.