IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/edn/sirdps/642.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Debunking Mill’s "Fourth Fundamental Proposition on Capital"

Author

Listed:
  • Grieve, Roy H

Abstract

J S Mill’s enigmatic "Fourth Proposition on Capital" has been brought to our notice by Steven Kates (2015). Kates takes a positive view of the proposition. Our focus is not, however, on Kates, but on the aforesaid proposition. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate, via close examination of Mill’s explanatory examples, just how unsatisfactory are its foundations. We conclude that the doubters are justified: Mill’s Fourth Proposition is, demonstrably, a muddle.

Suggested Citation

  • Grieve, Roy H, 2015. "Debunking Mill’s "Fourth Fundamental Proposition on Capital"," SIRE Discussion Papers 2015-54, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    • Handle: RePEc:edn:sirdps:642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10943/642
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James H. Thompson, 1975. "Mill's Fourth Fundamental Proposition: A Paradox Revisited," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 174-192, Summer.
    2. Kates, Steven, 2015. "Mill’S Fourth Fundamental Proposition On Capital: A Paradox Explained," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(1), pages 39-56, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grieve, Roy H, 2015. "Debunking Mill’s "Fourth Fundamental Proposition on Capital"," 2007 Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1, 2007, Portland, Oregon TN 2015-54, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Roy H Grieve, 2015. "Debunking Mill's "Fourth fundamental proposition on capital"," Working Papers 1502, University of Strathclyde Business School, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:edn:sirdps:642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Research Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sireeuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.