IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/edn/esedps/50.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pre-trial settlement: Who's for two-way offers?

Author

Listed:

Abstract

This paper reviews the use of cost shifting devices intended to encourage pre-trial settlement. Both the well-known instrument of judicial offers (tenders) and the more recently introduced pursuers’ offers are discussed. Numerical examples are provided and experimental evidence is reviewed. Both sources create some doubts regarding the efficacy of such devices in encouraging settlement. There is a strategic aspect of negotiating that is encouraged by these rules. In essence, these arrangements impart a certain amount of power to one side or other. This influences the level of settlement (if any), but may also reduce the probability of reaching a settlement. Abandoning such arrangements, while somewhat contrary to conventional views may well be a positive step in encouraging pre-trial settlement.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian G Main & Andrew Park, 1999. "Pre-trial settlement: Who's for two-way offers?," Edinburgh School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 50, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
    • Handle: RePEc:edn:esedps:50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econ.ed.ac.uk/papers/id50_esedps.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:edn:esedps:50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Research Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deediuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.