Report NEP-EXP-2004-04-25

This is the archive for NEP-EXP, a report on new working papers in the area of Experimental Economics. Daniel Houser issued this report. It is usually issued weekly.

Subscribe to this report: email, RSS, or Mastodon.

Other reports in NEP-EXP

The following items were announced in this report:

• Brian G Main & Andrew Park, 1999. "The impact of defendant offers into court on negotiation in the shadow of the law: experimental evidence," Edinburgh School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 29, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
• Ed Hopkins, 2000. "Two Competing Models of How People Learn in Games," Edinburgh School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 51, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
• Radosveta Ivanova-Stenzel & Timothy C. Salmon, 2004. "Bidder Preferences Among Auction Institutions," Experimental 0404005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
• Jan Rouwendal & Arianne T. de Blaeij, 2004. "Inconsistent and Lexicographic Choices in Stated Preference Analysis," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 04-038/3, Tinbergen Institute.
• John Bone & John Hey & John Suckling, "undated". "A Simple Risk-Sharing Experiment," Discussion Papers 00/36, Department of Economics, University of York.
• Item repec:dgr:uvatin:20040025 is not listed on IDEAS anymore

• Brian G Main & Andrew Park, 1998. "An experiment with two-way offers into court: restoring the balance in pre-trial negotiation," Edinburgh School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 28, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
• Brian G Main & Andrew Park, 1999. "Pre-trial settlement: Who's for two-way offers?," Edinburgh School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 50, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
• Eric Danan & Anthony Ziegelmeyer, 2004. "Are preferences incomplete? An experimental study using flexible choices," Papers on Strategic Interaction 2004-23, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group.