IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/4174.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Framework for Geoeconomics

Author

Listed:
  • Clayton, Christopher

    (Yale U)

  • Maggiori, Matteo

    (Stanford U)

  • Schreger, Jesse

    (Columbia U)

Abstract

Governments use their countries’ economic strength from existing financial and trade relationships to achieve geopolitical and economic goals. We refer to this practice as geoeconomics. We build a framework based on three core ingredients: limited contract enforceability, input-output linkages, and externalities. Geoeconomic power arises from the ability to jointly exercise threats across separate economic activities. A hegemon, like the United States, exerts its power on firms and governments in its economic network by asking these entities to take costly actions that manipulate the world equilibrium in the hegemon’s favor. We characterize the optimal actions and show that they take the form of mark-ups on goods or higher rates on lending, but also import restrictions and tariffs. Input-output amplification makes controlling some sectors more valuable for the hegemon since changes in the allocation of these strategic sectors have a larger influence on the world economy. This formalizes the idea of economic coercion as a combination of strategic pressure and costly actions. We apply the framework to two leading examples: national security externalities and the Belt and Road Initiative.

Suggested Citation

  • Clayton, Christopher & Maggiori, Matteo & Schreger, Jesse, 2024. "A Framework for Geoeconomics," Research Papers 4174, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:4174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/working-papers/framework-geoeconomics
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdoulaye Ndiaye, 2024. "A Theory of International Boycotts," CESifo Working Paper Series 11267, CESifo.
    2. Matteo Maggiori & Chris Clayton & Jesse Schreger, "undated". "A theory of economic coercion and fragmentation," BIS Working Papers 1224, Bank for International Settlements.
    3. Satish Kumar & Amar Rao, 2024. "Assessing And Mitigating The Impact Of Geopolitical Risk Uncertainty On The Indian Financial Sector: A Policy Perspective," Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, Bank Indonesia, vol. 27(3), pages 483-526, July.
    4. Ambrocio, Gene & Hasan, Iftekhar & Li, Xiang, 2023. "Global political ties and the global financial cycle," IWH Discussion Papers 23/2023, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    5. Marijana Maksimović & Neven Cvetičanin & Ivan Nikolić, 2024. "Between Geopolitics And Geoeconomics – The Influence Of Foreign Direct Investments (Fdi) On The Economy Of Serbia," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 69(243), pages 69-92, October –.
    6. Aiyar, Shekhar & Malacrino, Davide & Presbitero, Andrea F., 2024. "Investing in friends: The role of geopolitical alignment in FDI flows," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    7. Cathrin Mohr & Christoph Trebesch, 2024. "Geoeconomics," CESifo Working Paper Series 11564, CESifo.
    8. Clayton, Christopher & Maggiori, Matteo & Schreger, Jesse, 2025. "The Political Economy of Geoeconomic Power," SocArXiv j8p3m, Center for Open Science.
    9. Ashani Amarasinghe & Kathryn Baragwanath, 2025. "Getting Along or Getting Ahead? The Domestic Roots of Status-Seeking in International Relations∗," Working Papers 2025-01, University of Sydney, School of Economics.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration
    • P45 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - International Linkages

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:4174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.