IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/3482.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Spatial Pricing in Ride-Sharing Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Bimpikis, Kostas

    (Stanford University)

  • Candogan, Ozan

    (Chicago University)

  • Saban, Daniela

    (Stanford University)

Abstract

We explore spatial price discrimination in the context of a ride-sharing platform that serves a network of locations. Riders at different locations are heterogeneous in terms of their destination preferences, as captured by the demand pattern of the underlying network. Drivers decide whether, when, and where to provide service so as to maximize their expected earnings given the platform's pricing policy. Our findings highlight the impact of the demand pattern of the underlying network on the platform's optimal profits and aggregate consumer surplus. In particular, we establish that both profits and consumer surplus are maximized when the demand pattern is "balanced" across the network's locations. In addition, we show that profits and consumer surplus are monotonic with the balancedness of the demand pattern (as formalized by the pattern's structural properties). Furthermore, we explore the widely adopted compensation scheme that allocates a constant fraction of the fare to drivers and identify a class of networks for which it can implement the optimal equilibrium outcome. However, we also showcase that generally this scheme leads to significantly lower profits for the platform than the optimal pricing policy especially in the presence of heterogeneity among the demand patterns in different locations. Together, these results illustrate the value of accounting for the demand pattern across a network's locations when designing the platform's pricing policy, and complement the existing focus on the benefits of dynamic (surge) pricing to deal with demand fluctuations over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Bimpikis, Kostas & Candogan, Ozan & Saban, Daniela, 2016. "Spatial Pricing in Ride-Sharing Networks," Research Papers 3482, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:3482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/gsb-cmis/gsb-cmis-download-auth/427516
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruomeng Cui & Jun Li & Dennis J. Zhang, 2020. "Reducing Discrimination with Reviews in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from Field Experiments on Airbnb," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1071-1094, March.
    2. Soheil Ghili & Vineet Kumar, 2020. "Spatial Distribution of Supply and the Role of Market Thickness: Theory and Evidence from Ride Sharing," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2219, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    3. Anton Braverman & J. G. Dai & Xin Liu & Lei Ying, 2019. "Empty-Car Routing in Ridesharing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1437-1452, September.
    4. Lin, Xiaogang & Sun, Cuiying & Cao, Bin & Zhou, Yong-Wu & Chen, Chuanying, 2021. "Should ride-sharing platforms cooperate with car-rental companies? Implications for consumer surplus and driver surplus," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. Soheil Ghili & Vineet Kumar, 2020. "Spatial Distribution of Supply and the Role of Market Thickness: Theory and Evidence from Ride Sharing," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2219R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Aug 2020.
    6. Zhou, Yong-Wu & Lin, Xiaogang & Zhong, Yuanguang & Xie, Wei, 2019. "Contract selection for a multi-service sharing platform with self-scheduling capacity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 198-217.
    7. Daozhi Zhao & Mingyang Chen, 2019. "Ex-ante versus ex-post destination information model for on-demand service ride-sharing platform," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 279(1), pages 301-341, August.
    8. Long Gao & Jim (Junmin) Shi & Michael F. Gorman & Ting Luo, 2020. "Business Analytics for Intermodal Capacity Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 310-329, March.
    9. Hao Yi Ong & Daniel Freund & Davide Crapis, 2021. "Driver Positioning and Incentive Budgeting with an Escrow Mechanism for Ridesharing Platforms," Papers 2104.14740, arXiv.org.
    10. Long He & Zhenyu Hu & Meilin Zhang, 2020. "Robust Repositioning for Vehicle Sharing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 241-256, March.
    11. Soheil Ghili, 2021. "Optimal Bundling: Characterization, Interpretation, and Implications for Empirical Work," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2273, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    12. Gérard P. Cachon, 2020. "A Research Framework for Business Models: What Is Common Among Fast Fashion, E-Tailing, and Ride Sharing?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1172-1192, March.
    13. Oliveira, Beatriz B. & Carravilla, Maria Antónia & Oliveira, José F. & Costa, Alysson M., 2019. "A co-evolutionary matheuristic for the car rental capacity-pricing stochastic problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 637-655.
    14. Sun, Luoyi & Teunter, Ruud H. & Hua, Guowei & Wu, Tian, 2020. "Taxi-hailing platforms: Inform or Assign drivers?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 197-212.
    15. Hao Yi Ong & Daniel Freund & Davide Crapis, 2021. "Driver Positioning and Incentive Budgeting with an Escrow Mechanism for Ride-Sharing Platforms," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 373-390, September.
    16. Lei, Chao & Jiang, Zhoutong & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2020. "Path-based dynamic pricing for vehicle allocation in ridesharing systems with fully compliant drivers," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 60-75.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:3482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.