IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eab/tradew/21941.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

National Treatment on Internal Taxation : Revisiting GATT Article III :2

Author

Listed:
  • Sherzod Shadikhodjaev

    (KIEP)

Abstract

This paper examines GATT Article III :2 on national treatment on internal taxation. The fact that as of 1 January 2008, national treatment violations in the goods sector have been challenged in nearly 29% of the WTO complaints points to the great importance of the national treatment principle in the multilateral trading system on the one hand, and temptation of WTO Members to protect domestic production through internal taxes and regulations on the other. Cases involving de facto discrimination against foreign goods will increase in number given the sophistication of governments protectionist policy. The examination of a claim on a discriminatory internal tax requires a multi-tiered test of several issues including likeness, discriminatory threshold and protective application of the tax measure. This test applies differently depending on what sentence of Article III :2 is at issue. The controversial aim-and-effect approach is not relevant to the determination of likeness, but can still be utilized, to some extent, in examining the protective application of the measure concerned. Some discrepancy in the Appellate Bodys approach to the subjective intent issue seems to leave some room for referring to government statements in future analyses of protective application. Korea and its FTA partners have affirmed their adherence to GATT Article III. When the FTA parties enter into a dispute over national treatment, a problem as to the jurisdiction of WTO panels over FTAs GATT-plus provisions on national treatment may arise. Irrespective of what dispute settlement forum is resorted to, GATTplus provisions, as a lex posterior, would prevail over the corresponding provisions of Article III. Another problem is that FTA panels are not legally constrained by WTO jurisprudence. In this regard, it is suggested that FTA panels, wherever possible, follow the WTO interpretations of Article III to secure consistent and predictable application of the national treatment rule.

Suggested Citation

  • Sherzod Shadikhodjaev, 1970. "National Treatment on Internal Taxation : Revisiting GATT Article III :2," Trade Working Papers 21941, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:eab:tradew:21941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eaber.org/node/21941
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Srinivasan, T. N., 2005. "Nondiscrimination in GATT/WTO: was there anything to begin with and is there anything left?," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 69-95, March.
    2. Matsushita, Mitsuo & Schoenbaum, Thomas J. & Mavroidis, Petros C., 2006. "The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199208005.
    3. Matsushita, Mitsuo & Schoenbaum, Thomas J. & Mavroidis, Petros C., 2006. "The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199284566.
    4. Daly, Michael, 2005. "The WTO and direct taxation," WTO Discussion Papers 9, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    5. Pauwelyn,Joost, 2003. "Conflict of Norms in Public International Law," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521824880, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Éric Millard, 2016. "Teoría General Del Derecho," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 833.
    2. Mario Matus Baeza & Mark Unger, 2016. "Derecho De La Organización Mundial Del Comercio (Omc)," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 834.
    3. Julián Tole Martínez, 2019. "Colombia entre los TLC y la OMC: ¿liberación o administración del comercio internacional?," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1139.
    4. Julián Tole Martínez, 2019. "Colombia entre los TLC y la OMC: ¿liberación o administración del comercio internacional?," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1130.
    5. Matthew Littleton, 2009. "The TRIPS Agreement and transfer of climate‐change‐related technologies to developing countries," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 33(3), pages 233-244, August.
    6. Stephen, Matthew D. & Parízek, Michal, 2019. "New Powers and the Distribution of Preferences in Global Trade Governance: From Deadlock and Drift to Fragmentation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 24(6), pages 735-758.
    7. Simo Regis Y., 2013. "Integrating African Markets into the Global Exchange of Services: A Central African Perspective," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 255-297, September.
    8. Steve Charnovitz, 2014. "Green Subsidies and the WTO," RSCAS Working Papers 2014/93, European University Institute.
    9. Timo Gerres & Manuel Haussner & Karsten Neuhoff & Alice Pirlot, 2019. "Can Governments Ban Materials with Large Carbon Footprint? Legal and Administrative Assessment of Product Carbon Requirements," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1834, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    10. Lee Yong-Shik, 2009. "Theoretical Basis and Regulatory Framework for Microtrade: Combining Volunteerism with International Trade towards Poverty Elimination," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 367-399, December.
    11. Stephan Wittig, 2021. "Transatlantic Trade Dispute: Solution for Airbus-Boeing Under Biden?," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 56(1), pages 23-31, January.
    12. Obijiofor Aginam & John Harrington, 2013. "Introduction," Chapters, in: Obijiofor Aginam & John Harrington & Peter K. Yu (ed.), The Global Governance of HIV/AIDS, chapter 1, pages 1-13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Charnovitz, Steve, 2014. "Green subsidies and the WTO," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7060, The World Bank.
    14. Pärn-Lee Evelin, 2020. "The Origins of Supranational State Aid Legislations: What Policymakers Must Know and Adhere to. The Case of Estonia," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 123-145, June.
    15. Dong-Hoon Kim & Bong-Chul Kim, 2008. "Safeguard measures in RTAs and Proposals for the KCJ FTA," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 11(1), pages 53-94, March.
    16. Sehnálek, David; Tomášková,Eva, 2010. "Legal and Economic Analysis of the Czech Export Policy," Annals - Juridical Science Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Juridical Sciences, vol. 2, pages 111-124, July.
    17. Ceva, Emanuela & Fracasso, Andrea, 2010. "Seeking mutual understanding: a discourse-theoretical analysis of the WTO Dispute Settlement System," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 457-485, July.
    18. Chang Hwan Choi & Jae-Woo Kim, 2014. "Determinants for Macroeconomic Factors of Antidumping: A Comparative Analysis of India and China," The International Trade Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 229-245, March.
    19. Spagnuolo, Francesca, 2011. "Diversity and pluralism in earth system governance: Contemplating the role for global administrative law," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1875-1881, September.
    20. Harro Asselt, 2007. "Rüdiger Wolfrum and Nele Matz, Conflicts in International Environmental Law," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 305-311, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eab:tradew:21941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shiro Armstrong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaberau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.