IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/drm/wpaper/2014-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Ways of Selecting Applicants Diversity Speaks in Favour of Diversity

Author

Listed:
  • Guillemette de Larquier
  • Emmanuelle Marchal

Abstract

This article addresses diversity in hiring processes, its reasons and its consequences. Using the French OFER survey on the hiring practices of 3,584 firms in 2005, we investigate how firms organise the selection of job applicants and analyse the outcome of this selection in regard to the profiles of successful applicants. The data analysis reveals four types of screening processes: an informal process (streamlined) and three formalised processes (written-based, testing, and professionalised). The use of a type of screening process depends on the characteristics of the establishments and occupations and is associated with the recruitment channel. Finally, logit regressions show that each recruitment channel and each type of screening process favours and penalises different categories of applicants (e.g., women, unemployed or inactive individuals or individuals with no diploma).

Suggested Citation

  • Guillemette de Larquier & Emmanuelle Marchal, 2014. "The Ways of Selecting Applicants Diversity Speaks in Favour of Diversity," EconomiX Working Papers 2014-42, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    • Handle: RePEc:drm:wpaper:2014-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economix.fr/pdf/dt/2014/WP_EcoX_2014-42.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    hiring process; screening methods; recruitment channels; diversity.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General
    • M5 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics
    • Z1 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:drm:wpaper:2014-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valerie Mignon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/modemfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.