IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/diw/diwrup/135de.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Braucht Deutschland eine Ost-Quote?

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Metzing
  • David Richter

Abstract

„Es wächst zusammen, was zusammen gehört“, kommentierte Willy Brandt 1989 den Mauerfall. 30 Jahre nach dem Mauerfall ist schon vieles zusammengewachsen, aber trotz vieler positiver Erfolge gilt Ostdeutschland weiterhin als strukturschwach, mit niedrigeren Löhnen und geringerer Wirtschaftskraft (SVR 2019). Auch haben sich nur wenige Konzernzentralen großer Unternehmen in Ostdeutschland niedergelassen. So befindet sich unter den DAX-30 notierten Börsenunternehmen kein ostdeutsches Unternehmen (BMWi 2018, Gropp et al. 2019). Des Weiteren sind Spitzenpositionen in Wirtschaft, Politik, und Wissenschaft – mal abgesehen von der ostdeutschen Bundeskanzlerin – meist durch Westdeutsche besetzt und der Ruf nach einer „Ost-Quote“ oder „Quote für Ostdeutsche“ wird immer lauter. Zum Anteil der Führungskräfte, den Ursachen und den daraus resultierenden Folgen der Unterrepräsentierung von Personen mit ostdeutscher Sozialisation gibt es nur wenige repräsentative Studien sowie Projekte wie u.a. am DeZim Institut (Projekttitel „Soziale Integration ohne Eliten“) und die Informationen beruhen hauptsächlich auf dem Anteil von Ostdeutschen als Vorstände in DAX-30 Unternehmen oder in Spitzenpositionen einzelner Sektoren (u.a. Machatzke 1997, Bluhm et al. 2016, Schönherr et al. 2019).In der vorliegenden Studie fassen wir im ersten Teil die derzeitige Literatur in Bezug auf Ostdeutsche in Spitzenpositionen zusammen. Dabei konzentrieren wir uns, wie in den meisten vorhandenen Studien, hauptsächlich auf den Anteil von Ostdeutschen in einzelnen Sektoren wie u.a. Dax-30 Vorständen, Bundeskabinetten, bei StaatssekretärInnen sowie bei HochschulpräsidentInnen und -rektorInnen. Im zweiten Schritt wird der Untersuchungsrahmen auf Führungskräfte im Allgemeinen und in einem dritten Schritt auf TopmanagerInnen erweitert. Für die zweite und dritte Analyse werden die für Deutschland repräsentativen Daten des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels (SOEP) des Deutschen Institutes für Wirtschaftsforschung (Goebel et al. 2019) verwendet.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Metzing & David Richter, 2019. "Braucht Deutschland eine Ost-Quote?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 135, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwrup:135de
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.679720.de/DIW_Roundup_135_de.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mau, Steffen & Huschka, Denis, 2010. "Who is Who? Die Sozialstruktur der Soziologie-Professorenschaft in Deutschland," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 62, pages 751-766.
    2. Goebel Jan & Grabka Markus M. & Liebig Stefan & Kroh Martin & Richter David & Schröder Carsten & Schupp Jürgen, 2019. "The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP)," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 239(2), pages 345-360, April.
    3. Reint E. Gropp & Gerhard Heimpold, 2019. "Ostdeutschland 30 Jahre nach dem Mauerfall: Erreichtes und wirtschaftspolitischer Handlungsbedarf [East Germany Three Decades After the Wall Came Down: What has Been Achieved and What Should Econom," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 99(7), pages 471-476, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laszlo Goerke & Markus Pannenberg, 2024. "Wage determination in the shadow of the law: The case of works councilors in Germany," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(1), pages 83-115, February.
    2. Geis-Thöne, Wido, 2020. "Häusliches Umfeld in der Krise: Ein Teil der Kinder braucht mehr Unterstützung. Ergebnisse einer Auswertung des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels (SOEP)," IW-Reports 15/2020, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    3. Panarello, Demetrio, 2021. "Economic insecurity, conservatism, and the crisis of environmentalism: 30 years of evidence," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Max Deter, 2020. "Prosociality and Risk Preferences in the Financial Sector," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1075, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    5. Everding, Jakob & Marcus, Jan, 2020. "The effect of unemployment on the smoking behavior of couples," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 29(2), pages 154-170.
    6. Ghazala Azmat & Katja Maria Kaufmann, 2024. "Formation of College Plans: Expected Returns, Preferences, and Adjustment Process," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(2), pages 669-711.
    7. Caliendo, Marco & Cobb-Clark, Deborah A. & Obst, Cosima & Uhlendorff, Arne, 2023. "Risk preferences and training investments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 668-686.
    8. Schneck, Stefan, 2018. "The effect of self-employment on income inequality," Working Papers 05/18, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    9. Jessen, Jonas & Jessen, Robin & Kluve, Jochen, 2019. "Punishing potential mothers? Evidence for statistical employer discrimination from a natural experiment," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 59, pages 164-172.
    10. Alan Manning & Graham Mazeine, 2020. "Subjective job insecurity and the rise of the precariat: evidence from the UK, Germany and the United States," CEP Discussion Papers dp1712, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    11. Aksoy, Cevat Giray & Poutvaara, Panu & Schikora, Felicitas, 2023. "First time around: Local conditions and multi-dimensional integration of refugees," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    12. Arnaud Chevalier & Benjamin Elsner & Andreas Lichter & Nico Pestel, 2018. "Immigrant Voters, Taxation and the Size of the Welfare State," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 994, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    13. Tobias Wolf & Maria Metzing & Richard E. Lucas, 2022. "Experienced Well-Being and Labor Market Status: The Role of Pleasure and Meaning," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 691-721, September.
    14. Waitkus, Nora & Minkus, Lara, 2021. "Investigating the gender wealth gap across occupational classes," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108206, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Christina Boll & Andreas Lagemann, 2018. "Does Culture Trump Money? Employment and Childcare Use of Migrant and Non-Migrant Mothers of Pre-School Children in Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1015, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    16. Pawlowski, Tim & Steckenleiter, Carina & Wallrafen, Tim & Lechner, Michael, 2021. "Individual labor market effects of local public expenditures on sports," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    17. Charlotte Bartels & Carsten Schroeder, 2020. "Income, consumption and wealth inequality in Germany: Three concepts, three stories?," Basic Papers 2, Forum New Economy.
    18. Alexander M. Danzer & Carsten Feuerbaum & Marc Piopiunik & Ludger Woessmann, 2022. "Growing up in ethnic enclaves: language proficiency and educational attainment of immigrant children," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 35(3), pages 1297-1344, July.
    19. Huebener, Mathias, 2019. "Life expectancy and parental education," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 232, pages 351-365.
    20. Gihleb, Rania & Giuntella, Osea & Stella, Luca & Wang, Tianyi, 2022. "Industrial robots, Workers’ safety, and health," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwrup:135de. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.