IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dbl/dblwop/2278.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Money and lies: proxy respondents and the mismeasurement of income in surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Estrada, Ricardo
  • Goyheix, Daniela
  • Lombardi, María

Abstract

When sampled individuals are not found at home, many surveys rely on a proxy respondent: another knowledgeable household member. We study the difference between self- and proxy-reported labor income in Mexico. We use the panel structure of the Mexican labor force survey and compare workers' income when they report it themselves to their income when another household member does the reporting. We find that the monthly wage of male workers is 6.1% lower when reported by a proxy. For female workers, the reporting gap is minute. We provide evidence that the gap in the reported income of male workers is due to asymmetry of information within the household, in part due to men hiding income from their relatives. Finally, we study the implications of using proxy respondents and find that it can lead to an underestimation of the gender wage gap by 60%.

Suggested Citation

  • Estrada, Ricardo & Goyheix, Daniela & Lombardi, María, 2024. "Money and lies: proxy respondents and the mismeasurement of income in surveys," Research Department working papers 2278, CAF Development Bank Of Latinamerica.
  • Handle: RePEc:dbl:dblwop:2278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/2278
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economía;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbl:dblwop:2278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pablo Rolando (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cafffve.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.