IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cvs/starer/94-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Experimental Study of Learning in One and Two-Person Games

Author

Listed:
  • Merlo, Antonio
  • Schotter, Andrew

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Merlo, Antonio & Schotter, Andrew, 1994. "An Experimental Study of Learning in One and Two-Person Games," Working Papers 94-17, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.
    • Handle: RePEc:cvs:starer:94-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. De Castro, Julio O. & Balkin, David B. & Shepherd, Dean A., 2008. "Can entrepreneurial firms benefit from product piracy?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 75-90, January.
    2. Rustichini, Aldo, 2003. "Equilibria in large games with continuous procedures," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 151-171, August.
    3. Merlo, Antonio & Schotter, Andrew, 1999. "A Surprise-Quiz View of Learning in Economic Experiments," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 25-54, July.
    4. Rustichini, A., 1998. "Sophisticated Players and Sophisticated Agents," Discussion Paper 1998-110, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    5. Rustichini, A., 1998. "Sophisticated Players and Sophisticated Agents," Other publications TiSEM de5b9fc1-8021-4255-8a80-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Jinkwon Lee, 2007. "Repetition And Financial Incentives In Economics Experiments," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 628-681, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvs:starer:94-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anne Stubing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aenyuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.