IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpm/notobe/2215.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L’acceptabilité sociale des politiques environnementales avant le mouvement des Gilets jaunes

Author

Listed:
  • Blanc, Corin

Abstract

Nous étudions ici les déterminants de l’acceptabilité de trois politiques environnementales en France : l’augmentation des taxes sur les combustibles fossiles comme le pétrole, le gaz et le charbon, les subventions publiques aux énergies renouvelables comme l’énergie solaire ou éolienne et l’interdiction de la vente des équipements ménagers les moins performants sur le plan énergétique.Cette analyse est rendue possible grâce au module Attitudes to Climate Change and Energy de la vague 8 déployée par l’European Social Survey en 2016. Nous analysons les ressemblances de ces déterminants avec les caractéristiques spécifiques aux soutiens des Gilets jaunes. Nous montrons d’abord que les Français s’opposent plus à une taxe sur les carburants que leurs voisins européens. Ensuite, nous étudions les effets des caractéristiques socio-démographiques sur l’acceptabilité de ces politiques. Enfin, nous observons qu’un sentiment de forte responsabilité personnelle envers le changement climatique est corrélé avec un plus fort soutien envers les politiques environnementales. Au contraire, le manque de confiance envers autrui, l’une des principales caractéristiques subjectives des Gilets jaunes et de leurs soutiens, affecte seulement l’acceptabilité de la politique fiscale.

Suggested Citation

  • Blanc, Corin, 2022. "L’acceptabilité sociale des politiques environnementales avant le mouvement des Gilets jaunes," Notes de l'Observatoire du bien-être 2215, CEPREMAP.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpm:notobe:2215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cepremap.fr/2022/12/note-de-lobservatoire-du-bien-etre-n2022-15-lacceptabilite-sociale-des-politiques-environnementales-avant-le-mouvement-des-gilets-jaunes/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger Guesnerie, 2010. "Pour une politique climatique globale : blocages et ouvertures," Post-Print halshs-00754879, HAL.
    2. Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2022. "Rendre acceptable la nécessaire taxation du carbone. Quelles pistes pour la France ?," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(1), pages 15-53.
    3. Boto-García, David & Bucciol, Alessandro, 2020. "Climate change: Personal responsibility and energy saving," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dai, Zhifeng & Hu, Juan & Liu, Xinheng & Yang, Mi, 2024. "ynamic time-domain and frequency-domain spillovers and portfolio strategies between climate change attention and energy-relevant markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Bernard Caillaud & Gabrielle Demange, 2017. "Joint Design of Emission Tax and Trading Systems," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 127, pages 163-201.
    3. Shen, Meng & Li, Xiang & Lu, Yujie & Cui, Qingbin & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2021. "Personality-based normative feedback intervention for energy conservation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    4. Johansson, Alva & Berggren, Niclas & Nilsson, Therese, 2022. "Intolerance predicts climate skepticism," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    5. J. Hourcade & B. Perrissin Fabert & J. Rozenberg, 2012. "Venturing into uncharted financial waters: an essay on climate-friendly finance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 165-186, May.
    6. Gabriella De Sario & Giovanni Marin & Agnese Sacchi, 2023. "Citizens' attitudes towards climate mitigation policies: The role of occupational exposure in EU countries," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(2), pages 255-280, May.
    7. Adriana AnaMaria Davidescu & Simona-Andreea Apostu & Andreea Paul, 2020. "Exploring Citizens’ Actions in Mitigating Climate Change and Moving toward Urban Circular Economy. A Multilevel Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-46, September.
    8. Pétronille Harnay & Pôl-Vincent Harnay, 2012. "Carbon taxation in France: a failure compared with experience elsewhere in Europe? The case of road freight transport," Post-Print hal-01314897, HAL.
    9. Fernando Mata & Meirielly Santos Jesus & Concha Cano-Díaz & Maria Dos-Santos, 2023. "European Citizens’ Worries and Self-Responsibility towards Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, April.
    10. Yan Wu & Pim Martens & Thomas Krafft, 2022. "Public Awareness, Lifestyle and Low-Carbon City Transformation in China: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    11. Ma, Yuan & Liu, Changshan, 2023. "Configuration analysis of influencing factors of energy-saving behaviors: From the perspective of consumers’ pro-environmental characteristics and environmentally friendly social atmosphere," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    12. Jakučionytė-Skodienė, Miglė & Krikštolaitis, Ričardas & Liobikienė, Genovaitė, 2022. "The contribution of changes in climate-friendly behaviour, climate change concern and personal responsibility to household greenhouse gas emissions: Heating/cooling and transport activities in the Eur," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    13. Liobikienė, Genovaitė & Matiiuk, Yuliia & Krikštolaitis, Ričardas, 2023. "The concern about main crises such as the Covid-19 pandemic, the war in Ukraine, and climate change's impact on energy-saving behavior," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    14. Terzi, Alessio, 2020. "Crafting an effective narrative on the green transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    15. Zhao, Jinhua & Wang, Xianjia & Niu, Lei & Gu, Cuiling, 2021. "Environmental feedback and cooperation in climate change dilemma," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 397(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    France; Acceptabitité; Taxe Carbone; Transition écologique;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpm:notobe:2215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mathieu Perona (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceprefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.