IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirwor/2008s-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Risk Retention Groups in Medical Malpractice Insurance: A Test of the Federal Chartering Option

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia Born
  • M. Martin Boyer

Abstract

The liability crisis of the eighties led to the enactment of the federal Liability Risk Retention Act of 1986, which encouraged the formation of risk retention groups, a new organizational form that is incorporated under a federal charter. We use risk retention groups as a proxy for insurers opting for a federal charter and assess empirically the economic viability of an optional federal charter. Using annual data from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, we assess whether risk retention groups increase insurance availability and competition in the medical malpractice insurance industry. We consider the insurers' use of two different types of insurance contracts, namely occurrence contracts and claims-made and reported contracts, and evaluate the benefits to policyholders and society of insurers having access to an optional federal charter, while remaining under state regulatory and solvency controls. La crise des assurances de la responsabilité civile qu'ont connue les États-Unis au milieu des années 80 a mené le gouvernement fédéral à légiférer pour augmenter le nombre d'assureurs au pays via le Liability Risk Retention Act de 1986. Cette loi a permis la création d'un nouveau type d'assureurs, les risk retention groups (RRG), qui sont régis par une charte quasi-fédérale contrairement aux assureurs traditionnels qui doivent obtenir un permis d'exploitation dans chaque état américain. Nous utilisons ces RRG dans notre étude pour évaluer la pertinence d'autoriser les assureurs américains d'être incorporés et réglementés par le gouvernement fédéral plutôt qu'au niveau des états individuellement. En utilisant des données de la National Association of Insurance Commissioners, nous examinons si la présence des RRG a augmenté la compétition et la disponibilité de produits d'assurance de la responsabilité civile des professionnels de la médecine. Nous évaluons ainsi les bénéfices pour les assurés et la société de permettre aux assureurs d'être réglementés et incorporés au niveau fédéral.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia Born & M. Martin Boyer, 2008. "Risk Retention Groups in Medical Malpractice Insurance: A Test of the Federal Chartering Option," CIRANO Working Papers 2008s-14, CIRANO.
  • Handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2008s-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2008s-14.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martha Henn McCormick, 2008. "Selected Research on Insurance Regulatory Reform: A Descriptive Bibliography," NFI Reports 2008-NFI-02, Indiana State University, Scott College of Business, Networks Financial Institute, revised Feb 2009.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2008s-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.